Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs Skybox Security Suite comparison

Skybox Security Suite and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center are both powerful tools in the network security management category. Skybox is often chosen for its cost-effectiveness and strong customer support, while Cisco is preferred for its advanced features and comprehensive integration capabilities, despite its higher cost.

Features: Skybox Security Suite focuses on risk management, vulnerability control, and network modeling, and offers predictive analytics for comprehensive security visibility. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center excels in firewall management, threat intelligence, and application visibility, benefiting from seamless integration with other Cisco products.

Room for Improvement: Skybox could enhance its scalability for even larger networks and improve its integration options beyond existing solutions. User interface improvements could also be beneficial. Cisco may improve its ease of use and reduce complexity during the deployment of its comprehensive features. Enhanced scalability for smaller enterprises and option expansions in threat intelligence could also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skybox Security Suite is recognized for its easy deployment process and efficient customer support, which facilitates quick setups. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center’s complexity in deployment is countered by detailed documentation and support, enabling successful implementation in large, complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Skybox Security Suite offers competitive pricing with notable ROI through effective security management and minimal initial costs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a higher upfront investment, yet its powerful capabilities and integration justify the cost, offering substantial long-term ROI for large enterprises seeking extensive security solutions.