Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks URL Filt...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is 4.0%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

PauloRio - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2022
Stable environment, excellent technical support, and with good training you can go the distance
Our primary use case is as a firewall segregating networks and defending the perimeter I would consider this to be a medium product in its field across the board. Some features, for instance, are a way for the management console to be able to manage each specific firewall, for instance. Because…
WK
Jul 30, 2024
Provides visibility and control over web browsing with protection from malicious sites.
The main limitation is that it needs a live Internet connection for ongoing updates. URL filtering may not be necessary without Internet connectivity, as you wouldn't be accessing URLs. It's important to note that URL filtering itself doesn't require a separate license. The license you purchase grants access to the URL database and category mappings. If you're comfortable creating and managing your categories, you can use URL filtering without a subscription. Many of the employees, particularly in first-tier customer support, lack experience. This often results in repetitive questions and strict adherence, even if you have completed several steps. The biggest differentiator is its integration with WildFire. When a Palo Alto user worldwide submits a new file to the sandbox for evaluation, antivirus signatures, and URL database entries are automatically generated and propagated if the file is found malicious. While competitors aim to achieve similar results, they have not yet reached the same execution level as Palo Alto.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution very effectively provides malware protection and signature-based anomaly detection."
"The main advantages to Cisco are the scale, the integration, the training, and the possibility of finding somebody to work with."
"Among all the different solutions I have worked with, such as Palo Alto many other firewalls. Cisco has the support, documentation, and design. The documentation is widely available and it can help you a lot with implementation. It makes the implementation much easier."
"Ir's signature-based. We are also using the anomaly baseline formation, where it links the network, then anything that goes away from the norm is also flagged. Those are the two most valuable features."
"The security intelligence in the product is the best feature and give us all the information that we need in our network."
"It has helped to improve our cybersecurity and our network security posture."
"The most valuable feature would be the IPS is very important in Cisco Firepower because I can configure deep configuration in IPS and tuning."
"Cisco is number one in the technical support. It's good technical support and this is actually a problem when we do the recruitment for some other products. Other products you are on hold forever and the support might be not the best compared to Cisco."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature is that the product can do everything in a single device, including the firewall, rules, and the PBL. It also has good routing and switching."
"The tool blocks URLs."
"The Palo Alto solution has improved our organization by providing threat protection across a variety of internet connections. Our company also gets valuable insights regarding threat analysis."
"Prohibited URLs can be listed by category."
"Being able to manage blacklists and whitelists easily is very useful, especially for internal access and limiting outbound access."
"It provides visibility and control over where people are web browsing and protects them from going to malicious sites."
"It's allowed us to have better visibility and protection from threats."
 

Cons

"The initial setup is a bit complex because it requires a lot of configuration, firewall and zoning."
"The price of Cisco NGIPS could improve."
"The onboarding process could be made a little bit better."
"The attack patterns and payloads go undetected in Cisco. We would like to see a new solution with more effective detection of attack patterns. There should be more data analyzing patterns as well which provides useful information."
"We would like an option to search through the logs to be added to this solution."
"I would like to see the sanctions lifted so we could use the full solution and have the speed increased."
"NGIPS' GUI interface could be improved and made more user-friendly."
"Cisco NGIPS' performance could be better."
"One way Palo Alto can improve is by offering sandboxing. I don't know if they currently offer a sandboxing feature together with the firewall or not. They should provide secure sandboxing with the firewalls."
"It is an expensive solution and not everyone has the budget for it."
"Performance monitoring could use improvement."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"The main limitation is that it needs a live Internet connection for ongoing updates."
"An area for improvement would be the technical support, which can be slow."
"For hosting sites like Blogspot, they host sites that should be in different categories, but get lumped together in general. There needs to be more granularity or multiple categorizations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license required to use Cisco NGIPS and it can be a one or three-year license."
"The pricing could be improved. Our customers have a yearly license."
"Cisco NGIPS is an expensive product."
"They are very expensive in some places and not reasonable at times for many customers. I have had customers choose another solution because of the high price."
"Cisco products are not cheap and this solution is no different."
"Pricing depends on negotiation with the vendor, although I can say that it is moderate."
"It is highly priced but competitive regarding features and support services."
"This is an expensive product, with the biggest cost being the license that keeps the service going."
"Expensive, but that's because it provides everything."
"It is more expensive than ASA but is far cheaper than Checkpoint. So, pricing wise, it is right in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
University
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
There are certain limitations that need to be addressed.
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is a great way to keep your network secure and safe from malicious websites. It's my favorite feature because it allows me to easily customize and tailo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
Pricing is ridiculous. They've been jacking the prices up at a rate that they're actually starting to lose business because they're just too expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of te...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
The main limitation is that it needs a live Internet connection for ongoing updates. URL filtering may not be necessary without Internet connectivity, as you wouldn't be accessing URLs. It's import...
 

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering PAN-DB
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
TRI-AD, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.