Nagios XI and Cisco UCS Manager compete in the network and infrastructure management category. While Nagios XI offers better customization and cost efficiency, Cisco UCS Manager excels in unified resource management and infrastructure integration.
Features: Nagios XI is an open-source tool allowing custom plugin development, offering flexibility tailored to monitoring needs. It has a strong supporting community and excellent scalability, positioning it well in IT markets. Cisco UCS Manager provides integrated management across Cisco data center systems, enabling comprehensive control over server, storage, and networking resources. It stands out in its flexible network configurations, crucial for streamlined infrastructure management.
Room for Improvement: Nagios XI requires additional plugins for extensive monitoring, lacks complex clustering support, and needs manual script configurations, increasing setup complexity. A unified interface and enhanced API support would simplify operations. Cisco UCS Manager could improve by simplifying its interface and enhancing integration flexibility. Streamlining firmware upgrades and offering an easier configuration process would benefit user experience, especially for smaller organizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios XI offers deployment in private, hybrid, and public clouds but requires considerable configuration. With a vast community and forums for support, time zone differences could affect direct technical support accessibility. Cisco UCS Manager is typically deployed on-premises, posing challenges for those without technical expertise. Its customer support is reliable, yet deployment complexity can burden smaller enterprises, with licensing and support costs being key considerations.
Pricing and ROI: Nagios XI is cost-effective with an open-source model that saves costs; its proprietary license is valued for its features, offering good ROI for detailed monitoring needs. Cisco UCS Manager, although more expensive due to hardware and licensing, offers robust reliability and integrated management justifying its cost for full-scale infrastructure solutions. Nagios XI attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Cisco UCS Manager appeals to those prioritizing system efficiency.
The GUI could be improved. It's a bit too basic.
We are using the free, open-source version.
The alerting system is very effective.
Nagios XI provides monitoring of all mission-critical infrastructure components, including applications, services, operating systems, network protocols, systems metrics, and network infrastructure. Third-party add-ons provide tools for monitoring virtually all in-house and external applications, services, and systems.
Nagios XI uses a powerful Core 4 monitoring engine that provides users with the highest levels of server monitoring performance. This high degree of performance enables nearly limitless scalability and monitoring powers.
With Nagios XI, stakeholders can check up on their infrastructure status using the role-based web interface. Sophisticated dashboards enable access to monitoring information and third-party data. Administrators can easily set up permissions so users can only access the infrastructure they are authorized to view.
Nagios XI Benefits and Features
Some of the benefits and top features of using Nagios XI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Nagios XI stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its integration options and monitoring abilities, as well as its alerting features.
David P., a senior DevOps engineer at EML Payments Ltd, writes, “We use Nagios as a network discovery tool. We use Nagios to maintain our uptime statistics and to monitor our services. It has allowed us to be much more sophisticated in our monitoring and alerting.”
An IT-OSS manager at a comms service provider notes, “Nagios XI has a custom API feature, and we can expose custom APIs for our integration. This is a great feature.”
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.