Cisco Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP comparison

Cisco and Fortinet are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Fortinet is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 11.7% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Fortinet’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Cisco Wireless

Read 151 Cisco Wireless reviews

17,492 Views
16,077 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiAP

Read 12 Fortinet FortiAP reviews

1,858 Views
1,651 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco Wireless

Fortinet FortiAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 8, 2024

Cisco Wireless and Fortinet FortiAP compete in the wireless networking market, with Cisco having the upper hand due to its advanced security features and robust integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco Wireless excels in robust management, seamless integration with Cisco products, and enhanced security with CleanAir capabilities. Its support for high performance real-time applications makes it suitable for enterprise environments. Fortinet FortiAP offers a straightforward single-console management when integrated with Fortinet products, focusing on cost-effective security solutions appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Wireless can enhance its cost efficiency, user-friendliness, and broader third-party solution integration. Fortinet FortiAP could improve outdoor performance, seamless integration with legacy devices, and support response times for technical issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Wireless often has a steeper learning curve but provides strong customer service and extensive documentation. Fortinet FortiAP offers a simpler deployment process, especially with other Fortinet solutions, though customer service experiences can vary by region.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Wireless is perceived as expensive but delivers high reliability and integration, resulting in expected ROI over time. Fortinet FortiAP, more affordable with competitive pricing against enterprise rivals, appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions with satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

151

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fortinet FortiAP

Ranking in Wireless LAN

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 11.7%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiAP is 3.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

GulfrazAhmad

Division Head Enterprise Infrastructure (SVP) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integrates with ISE, and is secure, reliable, and easy to deploy

The main concern is the length and overlapping. We have to put on four to six access points on the same floor, and we face the issue of overlapping areas. If Cisco can extend the range of their indoor APs, we would need to install just one or two access points, and it would eliminate the problem of the overlapping area. They should provide built-in features for safe authentication. Right now, we integrate with ISE and FortiClient for this feature. We first check the NAC, and after the NAC and before the domain, a token password installed on their mobile or a physical token is required to join the network. If Cisco had built-in authentication, we would be able to eliminate one product from our network.

Read full review

Yati Gharat

Chief Technology Officer at Litmus

Integrates well with Fortinet products, but there are signal issues in the outdoor environment

FortiAP is very good in an indoor environment, but we are struggling with the outdoor environment. That is where we are having certain issues. We are not 100% happy with it. With the indoor environment, we are okay, but we are facing some issues when certain voice-related calls go from wireless points. There are certain drops, and we have faced these issues on an ongoing basis. We also have other vendors such as Aruba and Meraki, and we do not face any issues when there is a Teams or Zoom meeting going on. It could be that FortiAP is okay, but that particular device or appliance is not capable of handling that much load of voice and video. This might be the issue. RF Spectrum Analysis helps to understand what is the coverage and hotspots related to a particular access point, but then when we bought it, we did heat mapping through different vendors. If there are any rogue APs, we can identify them with RF Spectrum Analysis. We can see what the coverage area is, but there are some issues with that. Some of the offices have thick glasses, or the cabins are different, so in the RF coverage, what is shown is not what we get on the practical grounds. There are some issues with signal performance. It has the basic functionality that is mostly used, but there are certain devices that are not able to interconnect. When there is any issue or problem, if the administrator can get some information about that, that will be good. With Meraki and Aruba, we get certain beautiful things. If those can be integrated into this solution, it will be more beneficial, but we understand that being a security company, Fortinet's focus is on security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Compared to other solutions, captive guest network is one of the best isolation and tunneling."

"Good manageability, and stability."

"The main features are that it's secure and it's easy to distribute the SSID and control it. I also like the controller."

"For me, the most valuable thing about Cisco Wireless is its ease of use and stability."

"It's a reliable solution."

"Our organization has improved using this product because it helps enhance user experience. We use video communication a lot, like Skype. We used to get a lot of interference before and had a lot of issues during wireless voice or video calls. We get greater speed and performance with wireless now. It is nearly the same as a wired network."

"I like many of the features that Cisco Wireless has to offer."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it can be integrated into other solutions in a particular environment, including where there are wired and wireless connections."

More Cisco Wireless pros

"FortiAP's integration using SSID configuration for the input/output makes deploying permission rules easier."

"The pricing is reasonable for what it offers."

"The most valuable aspect of Fortinet FortiAP is the support."

"The integration is efficient, allowing for management through the firewall."

"The setup was straightforward."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy, especially with FortiGate or your FortiManager in place."

"I would give FortiAP a rating of ten out of ten so far."

"We really don't need to call technical support. Any time we have had to call, they've been great."

More Fortinet FortiAP pros

Cons

"The main concern is the length and overlapping. We have to put on four to six access points on the same floor, and we face the issue of overlapping areas. If Cisco can extend the range of their indoor APs, we would need to install just one or two access points, and it would eliminate the problem of the overlapping area."

"The configuration interface could be easier. They should make roaming easier and should fix it so that when you cross a building you can keep the signal."

"The product could improve the security system's alertness to detect and respond to intrusions more effectively."

"Its licensing has been very frustrating. There is also the complexity of managing the product. These are probably the two reasons why we're looking at Aruba. The way they license this product is not simple. There are some good features in the latest version, but there are additional license costs as well, which is frustrating for us. It is not really a feature issue for us. It really comes down to cost and licensing. They should make it a bit simpler to manage. We find the overall solution a little bit more complex than we would like to deal with. Its troubleshooting is a bit difficult, and it does require a high skill set. Comparatively, Aruba seems quite simple. One of the benefits of the Aruba product is that it is cloud-managed. We don't have to manage the management platform itself, whereas Cisco is on-premise. Its user interface could also be better."

"The coverage provided by the solution is an area of concern in some cases, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The main disadvantage of Cisco Wireless is its cost - it's expensive. Its interface is not easy. However, I like it since I am an engineer."

"If needs to provide more visibility. It can detect and do it, but as technicians we don't have a lot of visibility into seeing exactly what's happening. It doesn't give us a lot of log information for us to troubleshoot. They probably have additional software you need to purchase to get that kind of information. But I think not all companies can afford additional software to see those kinds of details. So if the wireless controller already had, built-in, those types of things for the technician or wireless engineer, it would be more attractive for the end-user."

"Older versions used to be hard to deploy. The latest OS, however, has made things a lot easier. While deployment is much better, it could always be even easier."

More Cisco Wireless cons

"The security integration between the network and firewall has room for improvement."

"I would like to have automation capabilities that would help us reduce the configuration steps."

"The improvement factor could be in APs. Also, it could have a control, like MAC address."

"Technical support is a pain. Fortinet has to get its act together. If you don't pay for premium service, you will have issues."

"There is room for improvement in the product by expanding the number of SSIDs that can be broadcast."

"FortiAP could be a little cheaper."

"The support offered by the solution has certain shortcomings, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"There is nothing that particularly comes to mind for improvement."

More Fortinet FortiAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"It's expensive because a lot of the controls come with licenses."

"Because the Cisco architecture is quite complex, you may end up having to add more components and licenses. So, the cost could go up."

"Cisco WiFi 1572 is very expensive locally and our budget for this year is used."

"There are annual subscriptions to use this solution. I have not been able to understand the licensing of Cisco. Some of the Cisco executives were not able to understand them either. When you first start out the price is zero but when it comes to a time of renewal you have to pay."

"Its price is a bit high. It is more expensive than its competitors, but when I look at the return on investment, it is worth it."

"The solution is a little expensive compared to other brands."

"The platform is expensive for small-scale businesses."

More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice

"Fortinet FortiAP offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Palo Alto and Check Point."

"If I compare it with the other enterprise products, the price is good."

"FortiAP is more expensive than some other options."

"The devices under Fortinet are not expensive. The solution's licensing part is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I would rate FortiAP a six."

"We purchased perpetual licensing, and additional costs may vary depending on the services acquired from Fortinet."

"The product is available at a very comfortable price for my company compared to the other products available in the market. The prices of products from Meraki and Aruba are high compared to those of Fortinet."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiAP?

If we have FortiClient installed on multiple devices, it is seamless to connect with FortiAP. It supports passwordless authentication as well. That is a great thing about it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiAP?

The pricing for Fortinet FortiAP is good compared to other competitive vendors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiAP?

The radio band support could be improved, especially for legacy devices. We have faced issues where older devices are not able to connect to the access point, often receiving messages that the pass...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 34% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 26% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 24% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 20% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 7% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless

February 2025

Download Cisco Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP

February 2025

Download Fortinet FortiAP product report

Also Known As

Cisco WLAN Controller

No data available

Overview

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Cisco

Fortinet FortiAP provides wireless network access for industries such as banking, healthcare, and logistics. It enhances connectivity with FortiGate and FortiSwitch, ensuring secure data exchange in settings like offices and malls.

Fortinet FortiAP is integral for managing connected devices across sectors. It integrates seamlessly with Fortinet products, enhancing security and connectivity. Users benefit from a unified console that simplifies configuration and monitoring without additional controllers. The support for passwordless authentication and cloud visibility adds value, while its use in environments like shopping centers and offices facilitates secure data sharing and access.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAP?

Integration with FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer: Simplifies network management and monitoring.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances security and accessibility.
Cloud Dashboard: Provides comprehensive visibility over network activities.
Direct Control from FortiGate: Eliminates the need for separate controllers.
SSID Customization: Supports tailoring of wireless access.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAP?

Efficient Network Management: Centralized control and configuration simplify operations.
Comprehensive Reporting: Transparent insights for improved decision-making.
Secure Access: Protects data through advanced security measures.
Seamless Connectivity: Improves user experience with simplified networking.

In industries like banking and healthcare, Fortinet FortiAP is deployed to enhance network security and provide reliable access. Retailers leverage its capabilities in shopping centers, while warehouses benefit from its reliable connectivity to support seamless operations. Managed service providers use it to deliver tailored solutions, ensuring effective network segmentation and coverage.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP

January 2025

Free Report: Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Wireless vs. Fortinet FortiAP report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.