Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Phosphorus Cybersecurity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (10th), Vulnerability Management (15th), Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
Phosphorus Cybersecurity
Ranking in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cyber-Physical Systems Protection category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 41.8%, up from 17.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Phosphorus Cybersecurity is 9.2%, down from 32.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber-Physical Systems Protection
 

Featured Reviews

AnandKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 8, 2024
Useful for active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval
I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally. Initially, I felt the Claroty Platform wasn't up to the mark for vulnerability management, but recent upgrades have been very helpful. The new features provide more detailed information, including CVE numbers and thorough explanations, such as for MS17-010 (WannaCry). This level of detail meets my expectations and allows me to determine how much of the plant's assets and devices would be compromised if a vulnerability is exploited. This information is crucial for reporting to the CISO.
Use Phosphorus Cybersecurity?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The tool is quite expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber-Physical Systems Protection solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Wholesaler/Distributor
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...
What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Claroty Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.