CockroachDB vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

Cockroach and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.3. Cockroach holds a 3.1% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

3,157 Views
2,153 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

Read 18 Oracle Multitenant reviews

910 Views
510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Oracle Multitenant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Oracle Multitenant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.1%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

François Dernoncourt

Oracle Expert at Capgemini

Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command

Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases. A great feature is that you can upgrade the container to a more recent version and all the pluggable databases are automatically upgraded to that version. Previously it would have required an upgrade for each database. The second great feature is the clone which enables you to get the clone of pluggable databases with one command, as opposed to copying data from one place to another.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has valuable security features."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

More CockroachDB pros

"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"It is quite stable. We have not faced any kind of instability in the database."

"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."

"It's easy to use and works great."

"You can scale the solution as needed."

"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

Cons

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

More CockroachDB cons

"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."

"From the scope of improvement, I would say that people are adopting new query options. Certain databases like MongoDB adopt new query options so that they can just pull the data."

"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."

"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."

"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."

"The user interface for this solution can be made better."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The price is worth the quality."

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

40%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

In my opinion, the price is worth the quality. But, the general view of customers is that Oracle is expensive. There are some cost-lowering benefits.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

Everything is going well with the tool. From the scope of improvement, I would say that people are adopting new query options. Certain databases like MongoDB adopt new query options so that they ca...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 19% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 18% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

SQL Server vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Oracle Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 37% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 32% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 32% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

December 2024

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

December 2024

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Pluggable Database

Learn More

Cockroach

Oracle

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant

December 2024

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.