Oracle Multitenant vs SQL Server comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in SQL, compared to Microsoft’s 18.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Multitenant

Read 20 Oracle Multitenant reviews

703 Views
386 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SQL Server

Read 268 SQL Server reviews

18,969 Views
14,206 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

SQL Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle Multitenant and SQL Server are both strong players in the database solutions category. SQL Server appears to have an edge due to its ease of installation and broader community support, whereas Oracle Multitenant is favored for its superior database modernization capabilities.

Features: SQL Server is known for its dynamic resource allocation, which optimizes performance by adjusting disk and memory usage. It supports enterprise tools such as In-Memory OLTP and AlwaysOn Availability Groups, enhancing performance and user satisfaction. Oracle Multitenant features container databases with pluggable databases, enabling efficient resource management and streamlined upgrades, which are beneficial for database consolidation.

Room for Improvement: SQL Server could improve its integration with other systems and enhance scalability to better handle large data volumes and high-concurrency environments. Users also express concerns about licensing complexity and costs. Oracle Multitenant needs to improve ease of use and integration with specific Oracle Database features, and users desire enhancements in its user interface and simplified database management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQL Server is appreciated for its easy installation and strong online support community. However, Microsoft’s customer service response times are sometimes slower than desired. Oracle Multitenant's deployment is versatile, and users are pleased with its support for modern IT infrastructures. Both solutions need better technical support responsiveness, though SQL Server benefits from extensive community-driven resources.

Pricing and ROI: SQL Server is generally viewed as more cost-effective, particularly with its free Developer Edition. It provides good ROI for smaller applications, often realized within a year. Oracle Multitenant is more expensive due to licensing costs but is considered worth the investment for large enterprises due to its advanced functionalities for database consolidation.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SQL Server

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

268

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQL Server is 18.6%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

François Dernoncourt

Oracle Expert at Capgemini

Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command

Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases. A great feature is that you can upgrade the container to a more recent version and all the pluggable databases are automatically upgraded to that version. Previously it would have required an upgrade for each database. The second great feature is the clone which enables you to get the clone of pluggable databases with one command, as opposed to copying data from one place to another.

Read full review

Azizul Haque

AVP, IT Division at NCC BANK LIMITED

It has eliminated all kinds of inconsistencies, and it is reliable, secure, and fast

I don't know whether SQL Server can support large organizations where the database size is more than 100 GB. It might be because of SQL Server, or it might be because of the programming of the software vendor, but a lot of people think that it is a problem with SQL Server. It can't handle a large amount of data or large data size. In terms of its usage, about 90% of our applications are running on the SQL Server database. We have around 1,600 users for our software, and all the applications are connected to the SQL Server database.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

"The stability of Oracle Multitenant is excellent, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are mostly medium and enterprise businesses."

"It is quite stable. We have not faced any kind of instability in the database."

"You can scale the solution as needed."

"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."

"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

"I would say that it is a stable product."

"It's a good learning environment, it's easy enough to learn and understand. Anybody that picks up the language early on will be able to develop in it."

"A valuable feature of the solution is that it is comparatively simpler to manage than Oracle."

"SQL Server's Management Studio is very user friendly. I like their database and the additional features it offers. It's also easy to integrate SQL Server with things like CLR, PowerShell, and command shell"

"The columnstore index feature is useful for us, and we also use the integration services. It is also very stable."

"The most valuable features for database management in SQL Server are SQL Server Management Studio and Visual Studio Code with its administration capabilities."

"The performance of the SQL Server is very good."

"I think just having everything in one centralized set of databases where there is easily managed manageable."

More SQL Server pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."

"Technical support could be faster."

"From the scope of improvement, I would say that people are adopting new query options. Certain databases like MongoDB adopt new query options so that they can just pull the data."

"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."

"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."

"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

"There are a lot of improvements in the cloud space about which we open a case with Microsoft every now and then. These improvements are not in terms of features or functionality. They are more related to their own compatibility or connectivity on which they keep on working to improve the product."

"They can build more performance-tuning tools in it. They can also make the stuff a little more user-friendly and provide the ability to schedule jobs. They can perhaps also streamline it a little bit so that it is not so resource-intensive, which would be helpful. SQL Server has a tendency to consume all the memory you allow it to. If you are not careful, you can basically break your server. I would like to see it having a smaller footprint in terms of system resource consumption. They might want to consider re-evaluating their pricing. It is expensive."

"If this solution could provide an automatic indexing feature it would be very useful."

"One stability issue I encountered was the deadlocking between calls to the same resources (tables, etc.). That was solved by row versioning."

"There should be more tools and documentation for tuning the performance of Microsoft SQL Server. It would be nice to have more tools for tuning because currently, all the tuning that we have to do with our databases is almost manual. We have to read a bunch of knowledge base articles, and this information should be better documented. Its free text search should also be improved. It is quite important for us. Currently, we're developing our own free text search because of the lacking flexibility in Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, we're kind of using elastic search and making different implementations in order to reach our targets. Using just the native free text search of Microsoft SQL Server is not enough for us. It should have more flexible features as compared to the current version."

"The Task Scheduler has a lot of shortcomings. This could be improved quite a bit."

"It will be very useful to have high-level database monitoring. It should also have built-in business intelligence reporting."

"SQL Server could improve by enhancing the integration abilities, adding more inbuilt data security features, and simplifying the maintenance."

More SQL Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

"The price is worth the quality."

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

"Cost is a major derivative for any organization. It has a reasonable cost value, and its cloud support is also better than others. Comparatively, Oracle can do the same things or is even better in certain areas, but it is expensive. The cost along with the support are the plus factors for SQL Server."

"Pricing for this product is very reasonable."

"The price of SQL Server could be reduced, the license is expensive. We have an annual subscription."

"Depending upon your usage, you can use the pay-as-you-go model for a short period of time. For longer projects, we can opt for one-year or a three-year license."

"The solution is on a pay-per-use pricing model."

"The cost is high and because it's an expensive product, we are in the process of moving towards open-source solutions."

"I believe the licensing to be on an annual basis."

"As compared to Oracle Database, SQL Server is less expensive. For mid-sized organizations, SQL Server is completely all right, but people say it can't support large organizations with more than 2,000 users."

More SQL Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Akın Kurtulan

System Director at Türkiye İş Bankası

Jun 9, 2022

What are the main architectural differences between Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle Multitenant?

2 out of 3 answers

Patric Gehl

Managing Director at rpc GmbH

Jun 7, 2022

Hi Akin, First, both DBs manage your relational data on several operating systems (Linux, Windows Server, ...) and as Cloud Services. The newer architecture of Oracle tries to support you in a mixed environment where you can distribute a large DB over your own servers and cloud services. But as we always saw in the past, if a new feature of Oracle is good, Microsoft will follow. So your main questions should be: -How big is your DB? The bigger, the more I suggest Oracle. -Are you in a mixed world (Cloud and your own servers)? If Cloud is Azure, I think SQL Server is a good choice. -Is the price a topic? The liscence rules of Oracle are sometimes complicated. Hope this helps a little.

Read full answer

Martin Zwarthoed

Database Specialist at Zwarthoed IT Solutions

Jun 8, 2022

Hi Akin, Without going into the technical details; did you have a look a the pricing of MSSQL and Oracle databases? I always hear that the Oracle database is better than MS SQL. But I never got to test this myself. What I do know is that when I tell a customer the Oracle pricing, they are usually going in another direction. You must have a very good functional reason to go for Oracle considering the price difference. As @Patric Gehl suggested: a very big database is good but for a good reason. Kind regards, Martin Zwarthoed

Read full answer

See all 3 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

51%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

I am not connected to the financial aspects, so I am unable to provide details.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

There are many functions where changes are not easy to implement, and we try to avoid modifying these areas due to security issues and the complexity of maintaining them. Also, support can be impro...

See all answers

Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?

SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...

See all answers

Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?

SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...

See all answers

Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?

My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 43% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 23% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

MariaDB vs SQL Server

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs SQL Server

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs SQL Server

Compared 11% of the time

LocalDB vs SQL Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database vs SQL Server

Compared 9% of the time

More SQL Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

March 2025

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Buyer's Guide

SQL Server

March 2025

Download SQL Server product report

Also Known As

Oracle Pluggable Database

Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL

Overview

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

SQL Server is a relational database management system (RDBMS) by Microsoft. The product's main purposes are to store data and retrieve it as requested by other software applications - on the same computer or on another computer across a shared network. The solution is built on top of Structured Query Language (SQL), which is a standardized programming language used for relational database management.

The product is tied to Transact-SQL (T-SQL), which is an implementation of SQL from Microsoft that adds several proprietary programming extensions to the standard language. SQL Server is built similarly to other RDBMS products, as its structure is a row-based table that connects related data elements in different tables to one another. One of its most important components is the SQL Server Database Engine, as it controls data processing, storage, and security. Beneath the Database Engine is the SQL Server Operating System, which is used for memory and I/O management, locking data to avoid unneeded upgrades, and job scheduling.

The solution has four editions with different sets of services and tools. They include:

SQL Server Developer
SQL Server Expression
SQL Server Standard
SQL Server Enterprise

The first two are available for free and are typically utilized by smaller companies, as they work with fewer functions and storage. The second two editions are generally used by bigger organizations and enterprises and offer more features.

The solution has several functions through which users can facilitate different data-related processes. These include:

Aggregate functions: These functions are used to calculate one or more values and return a single value.
Window functions: Window functions calculate an aggregate value based on a group of rows and return multiple rows for each involved group.
Date functions: These functions allow clients to handle data and time data efficiently.
String functions: Through the string functions, SQL Server processes an input string and returns a string or numeric value.
System functions: The system functions of the product return objects, values, and settings.

SQL Server Services

SQL Server has a wide range of add-on services that provide additional benefits beyond database management. These services include:

Machine learning: SQL Server machine learning services allow users to do machine learning and data analytics within the product.
Service broker: This feature is a part of the database engine and offers messaging and message queuing for applications on the platform.
Replication: This feature consists of transaction replication, merge replication, and snapshot replication.
Analysis: SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) adds online analytical processing (OLAP) and data mining capabilities to SQL Server databases.
Reporting: This feature supports the development of custom reporting applications.
Notifications: This feature generates data-driven notifications which are sent to subscribers of Notification Services.
Integration: This SQL Server feature provides capabilities for data integration, data import, and data warehousing.
Full-text search: Through this feature, users can utilize specialized indexing and query for unstructured text stored in the solution.
Visual studio: This feature supports data programming with SQL Server.
Azure Data Studio: This is a cross-platform query editor that can be downloaded and used alongside SQL Server.

SQL Server Benefits

The solution has many benefits for users. These include the following:

The platform ensures a consistent experience across other platforms while being fast and agile.
Through the built-in intelligence features, users can understand their data better.
The solution has enterprise-level security, which ensures the smooth and safe performance of users' data.
SQL Server offers the ability to retrieve large amounts of data quickly and efficiently.
The product installation process is fairly easy, and it offers a user-friendly interface.
SQL Server offers improved data storage and retrieval functions through frequent upgrades.
The solution reduces the risk of database server attacks, since it is not an open-source database.

Reviews from Real Users

A president at a consultancy evaluates SQL Server as a veteran solution with critical log shipping feature.

Harkamal S., a user at a manufacturing company, rates SQL Server with a high mark because it is a stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SQL Server report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.