Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector comparison

Mimecast and Netwrix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7, while Netwrix is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. Mimecast holds a 2.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netwrix’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection and Netwrix Endpoint Protector compete in the data protection category. Netwrix appears to offer a more feature-rich environment, making it attractive to organizations seeking comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Mimecast focuses on comprehensive insider risk management and threat detection, making it appealing for security-conscious organizations. It also includes robust email security and ransomware protection. Netwrix offers extensive data control features and multi-platform support, extending functionality with device control and content-aware protection, catering to diverse organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: Mimecast could enhance its multi-platform support, integrating more data control features and advanced analytics. Improvement in SaaS integration is also beneficial. Netwrix could streamline its technical implementation process, simplifying setup. There's an opportunity to expand reporting capabilities and enhance integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast offers seamless deployment with superior customer support, facilitating an easier transition. Netwrix offers deployment flexibility but requires more technical expertise, potentially complicating the adoption process for less tech-savvy organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast provides competitive pricing, delivering strong ROI for smaller to mid-sized businesses with a cost-efficient approach. Netwrix, while more expensive, justifies its price with advanced features suitable for larger organizations willing to invest in comprehensive functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,645 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is 2.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.7%
Netwrix Endpoint Protector	1.8%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Other	93.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Edwint Shuawula

Senior Service Desk Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Email continuity has protected finance communications and automates security and retention policies

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection could be improved if they can offer a remote app for ease of use. If the team is not working from a workstation, we usually have the service access through our laptops, and if there's an interface on a mobile basis, that would be useful. Ease of use for our newer recruits is an area for improvement. When someone just joins our team, we want an easy onboarding process for them to understand why Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is in place. Sometimes we do not have the capacity to train someone, but we would like to ensure that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is able to provide that training information to get them up to speed on what our system is, what our setup is in the Mimecast platform. Maybe implementing a deep dive AI tool that understands our organization much better and can relay information to anyone that we're training would help. This way, we can pull training parameters to track areas where our technical teams can improve their understanding and knowledge base and skill base into making use of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection better.

Read full review

Sivakumar Mahathevan

Head of Sales and Technical - Malaysia at Halodata

Provides robust compliance with advanced threat protection and user-friendly interfaces

The features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector that I have found most valuable so far are the two main key modules which are Content Aware Protection (CAP) and Device Control (DC), which is the hottest selling item from my perspective as a consultant. I find CAP and DC valuable because they are very granular in nature and it's easily understood and easily configured. That's why it's easy for us to actually position this product to any organizations with no complications. My impression on the multi-layered protection features of this solution is quite positive because now they've expanded to more things in the DLP itself, that are as good as an enterprise DLP solution. Therefore, I feel that in terms of its pricing values and so on, it is very competitive. I assess the value of the comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities provided by Netwrix Endpoint Protector as very good because I am a user myself prior to this, before becoming a reseller and now a distributor. I am actually a walking dictionary for this particular product. The comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities are quite granular in terms of gaining insights. We can actually deep dive into quite a lot of things and find a lot of information that they already have. Assuming if there's a breach, we will be able to know exactly where the breach has occurred and what has occurred, and they are quite granular in how they report their information, including their logs. Therefore, they conform to all compliance regulatory bodies too. My impression of the centralized management console feature of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is that it is one of the simplest centralized monitoring features that even a kid would understand, which is what we need in today's world—nothing complicated. My impression of the data encryption and control over portable storage devices features of this solution is that they are very good, especially the device controls, which I really enjoy using, particularly when it comes to portable devices USBs and the encryption tools that they have, which is another module called E-lock, or enforce encryption, that they do have. They are well-protected along those lines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm very satisfied with the environment and the dashboard."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks."

"The blocking feature is very good."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."

"Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."

More Cloudflare One pros

"The best part of CrashPlan is that it just works; it's a solid, well-written product with great support that gives users a sense of security about the data that keeps the business working."

"The application and the company are absolutely top notch!"

"For the investment made, we have saved the company tens of thousands of dollars from ransomware and human error."

"This has been the easiest, most reliable backup product I have ever used."

"This is a full-featured backup solution with a straight-forward licensing system and affordable pricetag."

"It has saved many users from the loss of hundreds of hours of work."

"Having an enterprise backup solution in place instead of relying on odd one-off solutions, such as time machine, easily saves $20,000+ in desktop support and admin time a year."

"The main plus for us is 95% of restores globally are all self-service."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

"Endpoint Protector has given us wonderful attention and they've considered us a partner in developing our product."

"My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that if they want something to protect data on both Macs and PCs then this is a very good choice."

"We like that content-aware and device controls can easily be managed. They're not complicated. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand them."

"Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) and Information Technology."

"The console is friendly and it supports Mac."

"The role-based access features for the teams that administer it is good."

"I rate technical support as ten out of ten."

"It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

Cons

"Feedback could be enhanced."

"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."

"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"Operating and tuning the product is difficult."

More Cloudflare One cons

"Protecting Servers would be an excellent area to improve."

"We had one server that has tendency to make the client stop, but usually fixes itself if you give it a few hours."

"Faster."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"Java needs to go away."

"Improved reporting on backup progress."

"It's a bit thick, so it takes time for admins to utilize full capabilities of the product."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

"The only aspect that prevents it from being a perfect solution is the occasional slower response time."

"It would be helpful if you could purchase a smaller number of licenses at one time."

"Some CoSoSys features do need to be improved."

"It would be helpful if they offered discounted pricing for long-term contracts to serve customers who are interested in committing for periods of three years, five years, or longer."

"Endpoint Protector would be improved with more DLP templates."

"We are using it to only apply media restrictions. When we are installing a new agent, we have to install EPP manually on a device. It would be great if the installations can be done from the server instead of me going to each PC or device to implement EPP or using a policy. They should have some sort of system so that a domain admin can install EPP on all PCs from a central manager."

"I have faced issues which shouldn't be related to this product. This product is purely a DLP, so it should only protect my data. I don't know what is happening with their agent or what is happening with the software, but it messes up my endpoint. For example, people are facing bandwidth issues. Before I deployed this on an endpoint, people were getting internet speeds of 40 or 50 Mbps. After deploying it, that would come down to 10 Mbps. And if I uninstalled the agent, it would go back to 50 Mbps."

"Sometimes, it should try to focus on one thing rather than multiple things. Endpoint Protector does device control very well, which is why we use that particular function."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It has a fair price. They just changed recently from perpetual licensing. When I bought it, I bought it on perpetual license, then they changed the whole company policy to go to subscription. It was a bit of a shock to us because we haven't upgraded it that many times. However, after speaking to CoSoSys directly, they gave us a very good renewal price."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

"[The pricing] is reasonable compared to what's out there."

"We found the pricing pretty attractive. However, volume-based pricing wasn't available."

"From what we've seen, their pricing is a lot lower than the other stuff we've looked at. I actually don't have any concerns with their pricing. They were probably the most reasonable company out there for the features that were offered. It was pretty straightforward in terms of licensing, and you just pay for the license."

"This is a budget-friendly solution that covers all the aspects of host-level DLP."

"The product has average pricing."

"The price of Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys is more or less the same as other competing solutions."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?

My advice for others looking into using Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to evaluate it, and i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?

There are no particular reviews on improvement from my side regarding Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Prote...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

My main use case for Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is email security, as I have deployed it as...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

The licensing issue was eventually resolved by the team, but the Linux client issue persisted. Not all the policies a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Endpoint Protector?

Our main use case involved compliance requirements stating that we wanted to have DLP functionality on our endpoint d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 8% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

June 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

May 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

May 2026

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection streamlines automated backups and simplifies navigation with intuitive interfaces, supporting cross-platform environments and central administration.

Offering seamless integration of security and management tools, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection enhances data protection while ensuring ease of use. With real-time data management and centralized administration, businesses experience minimized maintenance effort. Despite needing improvements in reporting, account management, and mobile integration, its robust risk scoring and lightweight clients offer substantial benefits. Designed for corporate and HIPAA-related data, it aids recovery from device losses and strengthens data loss prevention, integrating well into egress strategies.

What are the key features of Mimecast?

Automated Backups: Ensures data is backed up seamlessly with minimal intervention.
Real-time Data Management: Provides up-to-date data access and processing.
Cross-platform Support: Maintains functionality across different systems and devices.
Intuitive Interfaces: Easy navigation improves user experience.
Centralized Administration: Allows for streamlined management of data and security measures.
Risk Scoring: Customizable settings for enhanced data protection.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data protection tasks with intuitive processes.
Maintenance Efficiency: Reduces manual effort through automated features.
Resource Utilization: Optimizes device and cloud resources for better performance.
Robust Support: Ensures help is readily available to address issues.

Industries like healthcare and legal benefit from Mimecast's data recovery support for HIPAA-compliance and large-scale unstructured data management. The platform is adaptable for both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, essential for maintaining security in high-risk environments such as during legal investigations.

Mimecast

Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers comprehensive data loss prevention on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It manages USB controls and ensures data security by monitoring file transfers. Its intuitive dashboard and granular policy control make it a popular choice for securing endpoints.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels at safeguarding sensitive information by enforcing data encryption, controlling device access, and monitoring data movements such as clipboard actions and external device usage. This tool provides robust support and employs role-based access control, enhancing efficiency in preventing unauthorized data exfiltration. While users appreciate its capabilities, improvements in policy customization and deployment are necessary, alongside enhanced coordination across operating systems. Users also face challenges with uninstallation issues and require better network-level DLP features and interface stability.

What are the key features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector?

Device Control: Offers comprehensive management of USB and peripheral device access to protect against data breaches.
Content-Aware Protection: Monitors data transfers to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information.
Enforced Encryption: Ensures data encryption policies are applied for secure file exchanges.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides a user-friendly interface for managing security policies and monitoring activities.
Role-Based Access Control: Allows for tailored access permissions to enhance security and manageability.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating?

Compliance Support: Aids in adhering to regulations like SOC 2 and HIPAA through effective data management.
Remote Work Security: Strengthens endpoint protection in multi-platform environments for remote work scenarios.
Data Integrity: Protects against unauthorized exfiltration and exposure to malware.
Operational Efficiency: Facilitates centralized management of installations across different platforms.

Organizations across sectors employ Netwrix Endpoint Protector for data loss prevention, compliance, and monitoring capabilities. Its strength in managing device access and securing data on Windows, Linux, and Mac platforms makes it ideal for enterprises seeking to protect sensitive information. The tool's ability to support remote work enhances its appeal in diverse operational settings.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

23andMe

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2026

Free Report: Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.