Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CodeSonar vs Onapsis comparison

CodeSecure and Onapsis are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Onapsis is ranked #39. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Onapsis’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Onapsis users who would recommend it.
CodeSonar
Read 7 CodeSonar reviews
  • 2,002 Views
  • 1,280 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Onapsis
Read 1 Onapsis review
  • 332 Views
  • 215 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CodeSonar and Onapsis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,562 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CodeSonar is praised for scalability, performing well across projects, and organizations report no issues scaling its usage.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
CodeSonar effectively detects memory leaks, runtime errors, and security threats, ensuring code stability with its user-friendly interface.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
CodeSonar needs improved architecture scanning, language support, security features, flexible licensing, and easier setup to compete with Polyspace.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CodeSonar is highly stable and dependable, consistently receiving high ratings for its reliability and crash-free performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.4
CodeSonar's support team is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and excellent service, often rated four to five stars.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.5
CodeSonar is expensive but valued for reliability and ease of use, with costs over $100,000 annually for large projects.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar
Ranking in Application Security Tools
20th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (5th)
Onapsis
Ranking in Application Security Tools
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Onapsis is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY - PeerSpot reviewer
Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand
This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.
Read full review
it_user19113 - PeerSpot reviewer
It checks for and reports vulnerabilities on all SAP systems at the OS, DB and SAP levels.
I really love how Onapsis X1 is able to check SAP for threats; the reporting was something I felt could be improved. It could be a little easier to use and to publish for consumption with a larger audience. Currently, it takes some background jobs and additional work to get them published. It was difficult to get interactive reports to the different levels of the business. I would have to download them and send them out, or save them on my SharePoint site and send out a weekly link. In the version of the product I was usingת I had to log into the X1 system directly to get to the reports. Reporting would be used by several different areas of the organizationת many of whom would be at the director and executive levels. It would not make sense to have them log directly into the tool to look at these reports. Add to this that there was only one ID that could be used to log in and view the reports. To solve this problemת I had to run all of the different reports; executive summary down to detailed analysis and then export them out to my security team SharePoint site. To automate this processת a batch script was created to run after the X1 analyzed the systems. The script would pull the reports and place them in the SharePoint site automatically, but it was a bit of a hassle to get set up.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?
CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?
The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CodeSonar?
Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar
Compared 61% of the time
Coverity vs CodeSonar Logo
Coverity vs CodeSonar
Compared 18% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar
Compared 8% of the time
Klocwork vs CodeSonar Logo
Klocwork vs CodeSonar
Compared 4% of the time
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar Logo
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs CodeSonar
Compared 3% of the time
More CodeSonar Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
CodeSonar reportDownload CodeSonar product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Onapsis reportDownload Onapsis product report
 

Learn More

CodeSecure
Onapsis
 

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Through continuous monitoring, the Onapsis Security Platform (OSP) delivers a near real-time preventative, detective and corrective approach for securing SAP systems and applications whether deployed on-premise, or in a private, public or hybrid cloud environment.

 

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
Sony, US Army, Westinghouse, AXA. Galicia, Daimler, Roche, Levi's, Siemens, ABB, KPMG, Mercardo Libre, Verizon, Bacardi, Adgas, Sicpa, Whirlpool, Leaseplan
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.