Cohesity Data Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Cohesity and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Cohesity is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5. Cohesity holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cohesity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

432 Views
261 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,521 Views
931 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Cohesity Data Cloud compete in the data protection market. Cohesity Data Cloud appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and user satisfaction.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is known for its reliability and comprehensive backup and recovery coverage. It also offers solid support services and competitive pricing. Cohesity Data Cloud provides innovative scalability, integrated data protection and management features, and stands out in user satisfaction due to its extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector users seek better performance and agility as the solution can be slow and challenging to configure. Enhancements in user experience are also desired. Cohesity Data Cloud users look for improved reporting capabilities, more granular data management control, and enhancements in user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector's deployment is seen as labor-intensive, with average customer service feedback. Cohesity Data Cloud receives favorable reviews for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is often viewed as more cost-effective with a quicker return on investment. Cohesity Data Cloud, despite its higher initial setup costs, is valued by users for delivering long-term ROI through its robust and versatile functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (34th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

AmarpreetSingh

Technical Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI

The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."

"It is easy to install and use."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."

"Our data center size occupancy for Cohesity appliance is reduced by 70% when we installed Cohesity."

"We use Cohesity Helios primarily in our data management strategy for backup and reporting."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

"Backup of SAP/Oracle -- they are more robust than the competition."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."

"The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."

"Their documentation portal is not up to date for newer releases and I strongly recommend Cohesity to increase their efforts on the documentation portal."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

"Virtualization."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"The technical support is poor and should be improved."

"The technical support was very slow."

"Other tools seem to be easier to use."

"I do not think that this solution is relevant in the current IT market. They have not upgraded their features and functionalities which makes it difficult for them to remain competitive."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"It's priced properly for the market."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Rubrik vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 74% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

April 2025

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Free Report: Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.