Cohesity SpanFS vs WekaFS comparison

Cohesity and WekaIO are both solutions in the File System Software category. Cohesity is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while WekaIO is ranked #2. Cohesity holds a 3.9% mindshare in FSS, compared to WekaIO’s 24.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of WekaIO users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cohesity SpanFS

Read 2 Cohesity SpanFS reviews

380 Views
242 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

WekaFS

Read 1 WekaFS review

2,266 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cohesity SpanFS

WekaFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cohesity SpanFS and WekaFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, WekaIO, Oracle and others in File System Software.

To learn more, read our detailed File System Software Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity SpanFS

Ranking in File System Software

7th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WekaFS

Ranking in File System Software

2nd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File System Software category, the mindshare of Cohesity SpanFS is 3.9%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WekaFS is 24.3%, down from 25.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File System Software

Featured Reviews

Stefan Motsch

Evangelist / CTO at FGNext / FGN GmbH

Along with offering competitive prices, the solution can be used by small, medium, and large businesses

While guaranteeing the strictness of the file system, there is a lot of performance involved. The performance is not as good as I expected. It's not the functionality here but the performance level. It won't be a problem if it's twice as fast. Even though its stability has room for improvement, I would recommend it to my bigger customers. The only problem is the current performance of the individual nodes. As a sale-out solution with integrated load-balancing functions, performance is in principle not a problem at all. Capacity and performance are linearly scalable over the number of nodes in the cluster. An increase in the performance of the individual nodes in future releases would be desirable.

Read full review

Roberto Telezynski

Solutions Architect - Senior at Storageone

It's really fast, flexible new technology and we don't have any bottlenecks due to speed

It's really fast, flexible and new technology. We don't have any bottlenecks due to speed. We can snapshot all the data to object storage and replicate it to another site using the object storage features. You can take as many snapshots as you want to back up all your data. There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want. Apart from snapshots of data to object storage, you can also tier the data, which is a different procedure. They can provide huge bandwidth or throughput to a single client. This is a very special platform for working with high-performance computing. You can use a server like a DGX or an NVIDIA and provide individual clients with almost 200 gigabytes per second. This is where PowerScale and Isilon have major limitations. We don't have such limitations with Weka. That's why it's been indicated for high-performance computing clusters. I'm very excited to work with this platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It has snapshot capabilities. We take advantage of those."

"There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want."

Cons

"Its read performance can be improved. It is just slow in comparison to other file systems, but a lot of it also has to do with the fact that they have a limited number of spindles under each node."

"The only problem is the current performance of the individual nodes. As a sale-out solution with integrated load-balancing functions, performance is in principle not a problem at all. Capacity and performance are linearly scalable over the number of nodes in the cluster. An increase in the performance of the individual nodes in future releases would be desirable."

"If the product included synchronous replication and VLAN integration, I would rate it 10 out of 10."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I won't talk about specific numbers, but it is a little hard to compare it to other products out there because there is nobody out there that does exactly what they do. If you are just comparing it to another NAS box, it is probably going to look higher, but that's an unfair comparison because it does things that a NAS box can't do."

"When it comes to pricing, I know the prices because I am also running tenders for customers where I am not offering other solutions. Hence, the prices are pretty competitive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cohesity SpanFS?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity SpanFS?

When it comes to pricing, I know the prices because I am also running tenders for customers where I am not offering other solutions. Hence, the prices are pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity SpanFS?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle ZFS vs Cohesity SpanFS

Compared 63% of the time

More Cohesity SpanFS Competitors

Oracle ZFS vs WekaFS

Compared 40% of the time

Nasuni vs WekaFS

Compared 33% of the time

Amazon FSx vs WekaFS

Compared 16% of the time

Quantum StorNext vs WekaFS

Compared 3% of the time

Elastifile vs WekaFS

Compared 3% of the time

More WekaFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

November 2024

Download Cohesity SpanFS product report

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

November 2024

Download WekaFS product report

Also Known As

SpanFS

WekaIO Matrix

Learn More

Cohesity

Video not available

WekaIO

Overview

Designed to combine the best of enterprise and cloud stacks, SpanFS exposes industry-standard, globally distributed NFS, SMB and S3 interfaces.

The IO Engine detects random vs. sequential IO profiles, splits the data into chunks, performs deduplication and directs to the most appropriate storage tier.

SpanFS also includes a new Metadata Store based on a consistent, distributed, NoSQL store for fast operations at scale.

SnapTree® provides a distributed meta data structure based on B+ tree concepts. It supports unlimited, frequent snapshots with no performance degradation.

WekaIO Matrix is the world's fastest shared file system that delivers flash performance at cloud scale and economics. The software runs on any Intel-x86 based server hardware infrastructure on-premises or in the cloud.

Sample Customers

Tribune Media

ZebraMed, Innoviz, TuSimple, Tre Altamira, IEX, iCarbonX, Mellanox, Spookfish, AI Singapore, San Diego Supercomputer Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, WekaIO, Oracle and others in File System Software. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.