Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Collibra Lineage vs OvalEdge comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Lineage
Ranking in Data Governance
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OvalEdge
Ranking in Data Governance
19th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Collibra Lineage is 3.3%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OvalEdge is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Prabhjyot Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Faster and more efficient than manual methods or other tools like Informatica
The main differences between Collibra Lineage and Informatica are significant, particularly for small to mid-sized organizations. First, Informatica requires a dedicated team, which incurs a huge cost, making it less suitable for smaller organizations. Second, Informatica's tools are very scattered. For instance, to create a domain, you need to use Axon, and then for lineage, you must use EDC. For profiling, Informatica Developer or Analyst is required. These different tools are not well-connected to display everything on one screen. While Informatica is trying to improve with its cloud version, not many users have adopted it yet. These are the two main areas where Informatica lags.
Sudhansu Panigrahi - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable hybrid solution for data catalog with reports
Implementing artificial intelligence in managing data is crucial due to the numerous challenges encountered when handling tasks manually. For instance, creating tags and terms can be time-consuming when dealing with an extensive dataset comprising millions of rows extracted from client sources to build knowledge. Leveraging artificial intelligence to automate this task would significantly enhance efficiency and usability for the end-user, eliminating the need for manual tagging and typing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Collibra Lineage?
The solution makes data more discoverable and transparent.
What needs improvement with Collibra Lineage?
It would be better if features like the privacy module and AI-based Collibra DQ were included in one package instead of being separate and requiring additional costs. Currently, the basic package c...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OvalEdge?
The solution is cheaper than competitors like IBM and Collibra and has good features.
What needs improvement with OvalEdge?
Implementing artificial intelligence in managing data is crucial due to the numerous challenges encountered when handling tasks manually. For instance, creating tags and terms can be time-consuming...
What is your primary use case for OvalEdge?
OvalEdge provides a comprehensive data cataloging solution. Whether you have lakhs or crores of data entries, our platform allows you to organize all your data in one place. This enables you to tra...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive
Beaumont CHKD, UpWork, Pon, Rakuten, Verbund, Globe, Naranja
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Collibra and others in Data Governance. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.