We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"Low code development."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"It is a stale solution."
"IBM BPM's most valuable features are its speed in implementing and providing any changes."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"We made the transformation to agile. Altogether with BPM, it is the total package."
"Process Modelling, simulation and optimization, integration, UI components."
"The most valuable feature of IBM BPM is the low code design, and ease of maintenance. Additionally, the integration is good and easy to do."
"I think the best way it can be it improved, is to make it easier to install. It's a very complicated piece of software, and there are a lot of things you have to do to get it set up. It's not just running an installer. You install WebSphere. You install the BPM product, and there's a large host of other steps you have to do: run queries against the database, you have to manually configure a bunch of properties files for your environment. I think if they could streamline all that, so it wasn't a considerable effort to install, that would be very useful. Because from an engineering point of view, you want to spend as little time as possible actually installing a product."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"IBM BPM lacks openness, that is, the ability to become open for new options in terms of APIs, front-end development, and ecosystem. IBM BPM has been quite closed. One of the main improvements would be to somehow embed the rules engine into IBM BPM. Merging IBM BRMS and the rules engine with IBM BPM would be helpful. If there was some simpler way to define rules without having to put IBM BRMS on top of it, it would be good. It's something that we can get out of Camunda but not out of IBM BPM."
"The debugging needs improvement. There is some confusion surrounding the debugging."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"You must have good experience to work with it. It is not that easy. Its installation is complex, especially in the new version for business automation, and it could be improved. It has a safety application embedded inside it, and you need to do a lot of configuration to install it. I have been working for two days to resolve an issue."
"The price and the overall installation process could be improved."
"The pricing is a little bit high. It's gone up in cost."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
