Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Confluent vs FME comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Confluent's customer service is praised for responsiveness and efficiency, though some users desire improved guidance and best practices.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Confluent efficiently scales across diverse industries, handling high data volumes, but faces challenges in multi-cloud and scaling down.
Sentiment score
7.6
FME excels in enterprise scalability and performance, efficiently handling large datasets with high user satisfaction, despite some resource limits.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Confluent is generally stable with few bugs, but occasional outages occur, especially during Azure integration and maintenance.
Sentiment score
7.3
FME's 2022 version is favored for stability, while the 2023 update receives mixed reviews due to interface changes.
 

Room For Improvement

Confluent requires enhanced plugins, usability, integration, security, documentation, cost management, search, governance, and tool expansion for improved user experience.
FME is costly and complex, needs online workspace creation, and lacks simplified loop functions for African users.
 

Setup Cost

Confluent's pricing is seen as high and inflexible, with larger organizations favoring open-source alternatives for cost efficiency.
FME pricing varies, with some users finding it cost-effective and others criticizing significant price increases due to rebranding.
 

Valuable Features

Confluent offers scalability, easy navigation, integrations, real-time streaming, customization, and user-friendly management, with strong support and documentation.
FME offers a user-friendly interface, strong spatial tools, smooth integrations, and quick results, minimizing coding and development time.
 

Categories and Ranking

Confluent
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (3rd)
FME
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Confluent and FME aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Confluent is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 9.1%, down 12.1% compared to last year.
FME, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 2.0% mindshare, up 1.6% since last year.
Streaming Analytics
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Gustavo-Barbosa Dos Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming
Implementing Confluent's schema registry has significantly enhanced our organization's data quality assurance. It helps us understand the various requirements of multiple customers and validates the information for different versions. We can automate the tasks using Confluent Kafka. Thus, it guarantees us the data quality and maintains the integrity of message contracts.
Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high
When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
Government
28%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Confluent?
I find Confluent's Kafka Connectors and Kafka Streams invaluable for my use cases because they simplify real-time data processing and ETL tasks by providing reliable, pre-packaged connectors and to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?
Regarding pricing, I think Confluent is a premium product, but it's hard for me to say definitively if it's overly expensive. We're still trying to understand if the features and reduced maintenanc...
What needs improvement with Confluent?
One area we've identified that could be improved is the governance and access control to the Kafka topics. We've found some limitations, like a threshold of 10,000 rules per cluster, that make it c...
What do you like most about FME?
We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?
The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...
What needs improvement with FME?
The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost
Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System
Find out what your peers are saying about Confluent vs. FME and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.