Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FME Logo

Top 10 FME Alternatives

Vendor: Safe Software
4.3 out of 5
510 followers
Post review

Top FME Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FME based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and Informatica PowerCenter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Safe Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Safe Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FME Logo
FME Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC excels with seamless cloud integration and robust support, appealing to businesses prioritizing advanced automation. In comparison, FME is favored for handling diverse data formats and spatial applications, attracting those who value powerful data transformation capabilities despite higher initial costs.
Download FME vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report
Informatica IDMC typically requires a higher setup cost compared to FME, which offers a more economical setup option. This contrast highlights a cost difference in initial investment for these data management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC typically requires a higher setup cost compared to FME, which offers a more economical setup option. This contrast highlights a cost difference in initial investment for these data management solutions.
FME Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
FME excels in spatial data transformation, offering advanced capabilities for geospatial data needs. In comparison, Azure Data Factory provides extensive cloud integration, supporting diverse data sources and scalable infrastructure, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing flexibility and comprehensive cloud-based data management.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. FME Report
FME has a lower setup cost than Azure Data Factory, making it a more budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Azure Data Factory offers a more robust suite of advanced features that can justify its higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has a lower setup cost than Azure Data Factory, making it a more budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Azure Data Factory offers a more robust suite of advanced features that can justify its higher setup expense.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter is ideal for complex data workflows with extensive ETL capabilities. In comparison, FME attracts users with its versatility in spatial data and diverse formats. Informatica requires more setup but offers robust support, while FME provides quick deployment and efficient configuration.
Download FME vs. Informatica PowerCenter Report
Informatica PowerCenter involves high setup costs, while FME is more cost-effective with lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter involves high setup costs, while FME is more cost-effective with lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference.
FME Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
FME Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SSIS excels in Microsoft integration and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for existing Microsoft users. In comparison, FME appeals to those needing versatile data transformations, offering extensive spatial data support and flexibility for diverse data sources, albeit with higher initial costs and complexity.
Download FME vs. SSIS Report
SSIS has a lower setup cost making it attractive for those needing budget-friendly options, whereas FME incurs a higher initial investment but offers advanced features, emphasizing a premium experience for users who prioritize feature-rich solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS has a lower setup cost making it attractive for those needing budget-friendly options, whereas FME incurs a higher initial investment but offers advanced features, emphasizing a premium experience for users who prioritize feature-rich solutions.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator excels in handling large data volumes efficiently, making it ideal for enterprises using Oracle technologies. In comparison, FME's strength in spatial data transformation supports rapid, specialized workflows, appealing to industries needing diverse data format processing despite higher costs.
Download FME vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves significant setup costs, whereas FME offers a more affordable implementation process. This notable price disparity highlights FME's budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves significant setup costs, whereas FME offers a more affordable implementation process. This notable price disparity highlights FME's budget-friendly approach.
FME Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
FME is ideal for ease of use and spatial data transformation, appealing to those seeking straightforward deployment. In comparison, Talend Open Studio excels with customizable and scalable solutions, offering strong versatility and cost-effectiveness for businesses needing extensive connectivity and advanced data processing in diverse environments.
Download FME vs. Talend Open Studio Report
FME involves a significant setup cost, while Talend Open Studio offers a more accessible setup without substantial initial expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FME involves a significant setup cost, while Talend Open Studio offers a more accessible setup without substantial initial expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
FME Logo
FME Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
3.9 out of 5
FME excels in competitive pricing and efficient customer support, making it ideal for straightforward integration. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage offers a robust feature set for complex enterprise tasks, appealing to those prioritizing extensive capabilities and scalability over simplicity.
Download FME vs. IBM InfoSphere DataStage Report
FME has lower setup costs compared to IBM InfoSphere DataStage, which often requires a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has lower setup costs compared to IBM InfoSphere DataStage, which often requires a more significant initial investment.
FME Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
FME Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
FME offers data transformation flexibility and affordable pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Oracle GoldenGate provides real-time data replication and robust features, suited for complex environments. Buyers may choose FME for simpler deployment or Oracle GoldenGate for advanced capabilities.
Download FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate Report
FME has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle GoldenGate, offering a more affordable initial investment, while Oracle GoldenGate’s higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set and robust capabilities for larger enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle GoldenGate, offering a more affordable initial investment, while Oracle GoldenGate’s higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set and robust capabilities for larger enterprise solutions.
FME Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAP Data Services excels in enterprise data integration and transformation with robust support, appealing to large-scale environments. In comparison, FME's flexible transformation features and broad data format support make it ideal for geographical data tasks, offering agility and cost-effectiveness for diverse needs.
Download FME vs. SAP Data Services Report
SAP Data Services involves higher setup costs, while FME offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Data Services involves higher setup costs, while FME offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
FME Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
FME Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
FME excels in geospatial data handling, offering diverse formats and conversion tools ideal for spatial data needs. In comparison, Alteryx Designer provides strong analytical capabilities, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced analytics and reduced manual processing through its extensive built-in tools.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. FME Report
FME offers a simpler initial setup with lower costs, while Alteryx Designer demands a higher setup investment but provides a more comprehensive toolset.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers a simpler initial setup with lower costs, while Alteryx Designer demands a higher setup investment but provides a more comprehensive toolset.
FME Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
Denodo excels in real-time data access and governance, appealing to enterprises needing seamless integration. In comparison, FME shines with its spatial data transformation abilities and supports diverse formats, making it ideal for organizations requiring advanced spatial data handling in complex projects.
Download Denodo vs. FME Report
Denodo's setup costs can be substantial depending on the implementation, whereas FME offers more predictable setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Denodo's setup costs can be substantial depending on the implementation, whereas FME offers more predictable setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
FME Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
FME is favored for cost-effectiveness and strong support services with powerful data transformation and compatibility. In comparison, Fivetran offers cloud-based integration and automation, simplifying deployment. A tech buyer might choose FME for savings or Fivetran for its efficiency.
Download FME vs. Fivetran Report
FME's setup cost is often seen as customizable and potentially higher due to its comprehensive features, while Fivetran offers a more straightforward and cost-effective pricing model suitable for rapid deployment and minimal initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FME's setup cost is often seen as customizable and potentially higher due to its comprehensive features, while Fivetran offers a more straightforward and cost-effective pricing model suitable for rapid deployment and minimal initial expenses.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Talend Data Management Platform
4.1 out of 5
Talend Data Management Platform excels in cost-effectiveness and integration ease, appealing to businesses seeking scalable data solutions. In comparison, FME is ideal for those requiring advanced spatial data processing, offering robust features that ensure high ROI in industries dependent on geospatial data handling.
Download FME vs. Talend Data Management Platform Report
Talend Data Management Platform has a higher setup cost compared to FME, which offers a more budget-friendly option for users seeking an economical solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Talend Data Management Platform has a higher setup cost compared to FME, which offers a more budget-friendly option for users seeking an economical solution.
FME Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
FME Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automating data warehousing with templates and metadata-driven development, enhancing productivity. In comparison, FME provides broad format compatibility and spatial data support, appealing to those with diverse data transformation needs seeking flexibility over automation.
Download FME vs. WhereScape RED Report
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
View comparison
Pricing
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
4.0 out of 5
Pentaho offers budget-friendly pricing and strong customer support, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective integration. In comparison, FME provides extensive data format handling and automation, attracting buyers needing flexibility and advanced features, despite its higher initial cost.
Download FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Report
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics requires a lower setup cost compared to FME, which may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics requires a lower setup cost compared to FME, which may involve higher initial expenses.
FME Logo
FME Logo
SAS Data Management
4.2 out of 5
SAS Data Management provides excellent integration with strong governance and quality control suitable for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, FME excels in spatial data handling and extensive transformations, ideal for industries needing geo-processing and versatile data format management.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
FME Logo
MuleSoft Composer
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
MuleSoft Composer
4.0 out of 5
FME offers robust data transformation with flexible pricing, ideal for geospatial integrations. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer supports seamless app connectivity with pre-built connectors, appealing to those needing broad integration networks. FME's ease of deployment suits smaller needs, whereas MuleSoft Composer justifies higher costs through advanced features.
Download FME vs. MuleSoft Composer Report
FME offers lower setup costs compared to MuleSoft Composer, which could impact initial budget considerations. The pricing of MuleSoft Composer reflects its advanced capabilities and integration features, differentiating it from FME in initial financial requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers lower setup costs compared to MuleSoft Composer, which could impact initial budget considerations. The pricing of MuleSoft Composer reflects its advanced capabilities and integration features, differentiating it from FME in initial financial requirements.
FME Logo
Palantir Gotham
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Palantir Gotham
4.0 out of 5

The Palantir Gotham platform comprises a suite of capabilities for integrating many different data sources for secure, collaborative analysis. The platform serves as an enterprise knowledge base, containing the full record of an organization's collective analysis.

View comparison
FME Logo
FME Logo
SAS Data Integration Server
3.7 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers superior scalability and advanced analytics, ideal for complex workflows. In comparison, FME's extensive format support and user-friendly interface provide flexibility. SAS excels in data management; meanwhile, FME is preferred for ease of use and adaptability.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Business Process Management (BPM)