Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FME vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics comparison

Safe Software and Hitachi Vantara are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.7, while Hitachi Vantara is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6. Safe Software holds a 2.0% mindshare in DI, compared to Hitachi Vantara’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Hitachi Vantara users who would recommend it.
FME
Read 5 FME reviews
  • 2,791 Views
  • 2,095 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Pentaho Data Integration an...
Read 52 Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics reviews
  • 2,438 Views
  • 1,080 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Pentaho Data Integration and FME compete in data integration and transformation categories. Pentaho generally has an advantage with its pricing and customer support, while FME's feature set aligns with its premium pricing.

Features: Pentaho provides capabilities like data blending, reporting, and OLAP services, making it suitable for comprehensive data analytics. FME excels in spatial data processing, providing robust integration with geographic formats.

Room for Improvement: Pentaho could benefit from enhancing its spatial data handling capabilities, expanding its free version features, and improving its UI for more intuitive use. FME might improve by offering more flexible pricing options, simplifying its learning curve for non-technical users, and expanding its customer service options beyond self-support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pentaho features a flexible deployment that integrates easily with existing systems and offers supportive customer service for troubleshooting. FME's deployment is streamlined, particularly for geographic systems, but leans on self-service support.

Pricing and ROI: Pentaho is more affordable, offering strong ROI for extensive data integration on a budget, appealing to small to medium enterprises with cost-effective licensing. FME, despite its higher cost, delivers substantial ROI for industries with complex spatial data needs, justifying its premium through advanced features and integration options.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Pentaho Data Integration cuts ETL time and costs significantly, offering substantial savings and competitive advantages through open-source efficiency.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
FME excels in enterprise scalability and performance, efficiently handling large datasets with high user satisfaction, despite some resource limits.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
FME's 2022 version is favored for stability, while the 2023 update receives mixed reviews due to interface changes.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

FME is costly and complex, needs online workspace creation, and lacks simplified loop functions for African users.
 

Setup Cost

FME pricing varies, with some users finding it cost-effective and others criticizing significant price increases due to rebranding.
Pentaho offers a free Community Edition, while the Enterprise Edition has more features but increased costs post-Hitachi acquisition.
 

Valuable Features

FME offers a user-friendly interface, strong spatial tools, smooth integrations, and quick results, minimizing coding and development time.
 

Categories and Ranking

FME
Ranking in Data Integration
26th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pentaho Data Integration an...
Ranking in Data Integration
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high
When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
Read full review
Ryan Ferdon - PeerSpot reviewer
Low-code makes development faster than with Python, but there were caching issues
If you're working with a larger data set, I'm not so sure it would be the best solution. The larger things got the slower it was. It was kind of buggy sometimes. And when we ran the flow, it didn't go from a perceived start to end, node by node. Everything kicked off at once. That meant there were times when it would get ahead of itself and a job would fail. That was not because the job was wrong, but because Pentaho decided to go at everything at once, and something would process before it was supposed to. There were nodes you could add to make sure that, before this node kicks off, all these others have processed, but it was a bit tedious. There were also caching issues, and we had to write code to clear the cache every time we opened the program, because the cache would fill up and it wouldn't run. I don't know how hard that would be for them to fix, or if it was fixed in version 10. Also, the UI is a bit outdated, but I'm more of a fan of function over how something looks. One other thing that would have helped with Pentaho was documentation and support on the internet: how to do things, how to set up. I think there are some sites on how to install it, and Pentaho does have a help repository, but it wasn't always the most useful.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
28%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?
We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?
The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FME?
The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...
See all answers
Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?
Hi Rajneesh, yes here is the feature comparison between the community and enterprise edition : https://www.hitachivantara.com/en-us/pdf/brochure/leverage-open-source-benefits-with-assurance-of-hita...
See all answers
What do you think can be improved with Hitachi Lumada Data Integrations?
In my opinion, the reporting side of this tool needs serious improvements. In my previous company, we worked with Hitachi Lumada Data Integration and while it does a good job for what it’s worth, ...
See all answers
What do you use Hitachi Lumada Data Integrations for most frequently?
My company has used this product to transform data from databases, CSV files, and flat files. It really does a good job. We were most satisfied with the results in terms of how many people could us...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME Logo
Azure Data Factory vs FME
Compared 20% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs FME Logo
Talend Open Studio vs FME
Compared 16% of the time
Alteryx Designer vs FME Logo
Alteryx Designer vs FME
Compared 14% of the time
SSIS vs FME Logo
SSIS vs FME
Compared 9% of the time
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs FME Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs FME
Compared 2% of the time
More FME Competitors
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Compared 15% of the time
SSIS vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Logo
SSIS vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Compared 14% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Logo
Talend Open Studio vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Compared 10% of the time
Azure Data Factory vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Logo
Azure Data Factory vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Compared 10% of the time
webMethods.io vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Logo
webMethods.io vs Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Compared 3% of the time
More Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
FME
December 2024
FME reportDownload FME product report
Buyer's Guide
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
December 2024
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics reportDownload Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Hitachi Lumada Data Integration, Kettle, Pentaho Data Integration
 

Learn More

Safe Software
Hitachi Vantara
 

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Pentaho Data Integration stands as a versatile platform designed to cater to the data integration and analytics needs of organizations, regardless of their size. This powerful solution is the go-to choice for businesses seeking to seamlessly integrate data from diverse sources, including databases, files, and applications. Pentaho Data Integration facilitates the essential tasks of cleaning and transforming data, ensuring it's primed for meaningful analysis. With a wide array of tools for data mining, machine learning, and statistical analysis, Pentaho Data Integration empowers organizations to glean valuable insights from their data. What sets Pentaho Data Integration apart is its maturity and a vibrant community of users and developers, making it a reliable and cost-effective option. Pentaho Data Integration offers a range of features, including a comprehensive ETL toolkit, data cleaning and transformation capabilities, robust data analysis tools, and seamless deployment options for data integration and analytics solutions, making it a go-to solution for organizations seeking to harness the power of their data.

 

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System
66Controls, Providential Revenue Agency of Ro Negro, NOAA Information Systems, Swiss Real Estate Institute
Buyer's Guide
FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
November 2024
Free Report: FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.