Alteryx Designer vs FME comparison

Alteryx and Safe Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Alteryx is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.6, while Safe Software is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.7. Alteryx holds a 2.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Safe Software’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Alteryx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Safe Software users who would recommend it.

Alteryx Designer

Read 31 Alteryx Designer reviews

4,936 Views
3,979 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,554 Views
1,870 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alteryx Designer

FME

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and Alteryx Designer are competing in the data integration tools category. While FME leads in system integration and geospatial data processing, Alteryx Designer distinguishes itself with advanced analytics capabilities, making it worth the higher cost for users needing deep analytical insights.

Features: FME offers robust system integration, efficient geospatial data handling, and intuitive workflow automation. Alteryx Designer provides comprehensive analytics tools, complex data preparation, and predictive modeling.

Room for Improvement: FME could enhance its data transformation features and expand its analytics capabilities. It may also improve user interface intuitiveness. Alteryx Designer could lower its pricing to be more competitive, enhance deployment efficiency, and simplify advanced feature implementations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME is praised for straightforward deployment and strong integration support, ideal for technical teams with spatial data focus. Alteryx Designer offers a more user-friendly deployment and accessible support, appealing to a wider user base.

Pricing and ROI: FME offers a competitively priced setup with strong ROI in spatial data tasks. Alteryx Designer, although having a higher setup cost, justifies the investment with extensive analytics capabilities, providing significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Alteryx Designer vs. FME Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alteryx Designer vs. FME

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,319 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx Designer

Ranking in Data Integration

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Alteryx Designer is 2.7%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FME is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Ajay Nayak

Senior Data Engineer at Baxter International Inc.

An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support

Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, like data sources that are not present in your system, Alteryx works a bit slowly. Even if you have a good configuration and you are pulling data from an SQL server like SAP, then the solution also has a slow work process. It shouldn't be that much slow if you are pulling ten thousand records, it should not take thirty minutes.

Read full review

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the things I like about Alteryx Designer is how easy it is to connect numerous data inputs, including API connectors. This helps tremendously in reducing the time required to extract data from systems like SAP that don't have straightforward connectivity options."

"It has an easy setup process."

"I like Alteryx's browser tool because you can view how your data is handled live. There are many other valuable tools like transpose and the crosstab. You can quickly pivot your data, and there are connections throughout the database. It's so easy to create a connection. If you connect to sign apps or a more complex database, the tool contains all the tools you need."

"The product is very stable. The performance is reliable."

"Workflow automation, in general, is valuable."

"Alteryx Designer offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it highly user-friendly. Unlike Python and Apache Airflow, which require coding, Alteryx allows users to accomplish tasks without any programming knowledge. Its simplicity makes it accessible to anyone, even those without coding experience, and this ease of use is one of Alteryx's key advantages."

"When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis."

"I like Alteryx Designer's drag-and-drop feature, where you drag a component, configure it and quickly run it."

More Alteryx Designer pros

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

Cons

"Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, the solution works slowly."

"Alteryx Designer overall should be easier to use."

"Improving the key-based sign-on process and making it more user-friendly would be a benefit."

"We need more documentation."

"The only thing is sometimes it can be a bit slow."

"Alteryx's data science and machine learning capabilities are where it loses out to DataIQ."

"Its price can be improved. It is too expensive for our country. Because of its high price, we can't sell Alteryx Designer in this region. We used to be their reseller partner. There is also an additional cost for automating the data and running the flows, which makes it even more expensive. It will be very good if they can let users automate the data for free. Other solutions like Tableau provide this feature for free."

"Alteryx needs to improve its web governance. The gallery you use to filter the data is something else that could use some work. For instance, if you have a report connected to a database and want to filter a specific user, you should be able to suggest a specific region or a particular year. I know that the Alteryx isn't designed for data governance, but that would be great to think about."

More Alteryx Designer cons

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. It has license fees, which are renewable every year."

"The pricing is bit expensive."

"The licenses are expensive, making it difficult to consider acquiring additional licenses to the existing ones."

"I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."

"I rate the price of Alteryx Designer a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The tool is priced high."

"Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."

"It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."

More Alteryx Designer pricing and cost advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"The product's price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

26%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

29%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Alteryx Designer?

When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alteryx Designer?

It's cheaper than Palantir, but even Alteryx is too much for small clients. It is expensive, considering the server capabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Alteryx Designer?

For smaller clients with ten to 15 employees, Alteryx can be expensive. The server capabilities are costly too. The technical support could also improve by being quicker in response times.

See all answers

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs Alteryx Designer

Compared 34% of the time

SSIS vs Alteryx Designer

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Alteryx Designer

Compared 7% of the time

SnapLogic vs Alteryx Designer

Compared 6% of the time

Talend Data Fabric vs Alteryx Designer

Compared 5% of the time

More Alteryx Designer Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 23% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 16% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

More FME Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alteryx Designer

March 2025

Download Alteryx Designer product report

Buyer's Guide

FME

March 2025

Download FME product report

Overview

Information not available

Alteryx

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Buyer's Guide

Alteryx Designer vs. FME

March 2025

Free Report: Alteryx Designer vs. FME

Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx Designer vs. FME and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alteryx Designer vs. FME report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.