FME vs Qlik Compose comparison

Safe Software and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.7, while Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.9. Safe Software holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,503 Views
1,829 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,451 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

FME

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and Qlik Compose are competing products designed for data integration and transformation. FME offers superior pricing and support advantages, while Qlik Compose stands out with its extensive feature set, making it appealing for users willing to invest more for comprehensive capabilities.

Features: FME's graphical user interface is intuitive, reducing the need for extensive coding. It is notably effective in spatial data handling and integrates smoothly with various systems, offering numerous connectors. Automation features allow for easy scheduling and data trigger handling. Qlik Compose excels in advanced automation and data modeling. It simplifies warehousing with its auto-mapping and data segregation features, allowing for integration of multiple source systems without extensive coding.

Room for Improvement: FME can enhance its real-time data processing and incorporate more cloud-native capabilities. The interface, while user-friendly, could benefit from updates to further optimize user experience. Increased scalability options would also be beneficial. Qlik Compose could focus on expanding its data integration capabilities, as well as improving initial setup simplicity. Enhancing the intuitiveness of its data segregation features and providing more in-depth training resources would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME offers intuitive deployment with strong customer support, making integration straightforward and efficient. Its approach facilitates rapid deployment, which is well-suited for users requiring quick implementation. Qlik Compose provides flexibility with its cloud and on-premises deployment options, ensuring smooth integration within existing IT environments. It is noted for its comprehensive guides and responsive support, contributing to an efficient deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: FME provides a cost-effective solution with a low entry barrier, offering significant ROI through its extensive format support, appealing to smaller businesses. Its pricing model makes it accessible for maximizing ROI with flexible data solutions. Qlik Compose involves higher initial investments, with ROI becoming evident through its automation capabilities for large-scale operations. It is geared towards larger enterprises, offering value in robust data warehousing for extensive integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Qlik Compose

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It can scale."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It's a stable solution."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

30%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 23% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 14% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

More FME Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 52% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

April 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

March 2025

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. Qlik Compose

April 2025

Free Report: FME vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.