FME vs SAS Data Management comparison

Safe Software and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAS is ranked #39 with an average rating of 7.5. Safe Software holds a 2.0% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,886 Views
2,157 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

Read 16 SAS Data Management reviews

1,332 Views
1,106 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

FME

SAS Data Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FME and SAS Data Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. SAS Data Management

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Integration

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (11th), Data Governance (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Nov 8, 2023

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Vivek Trivedi

Head finance transformation at Ahli United Bank Ksc

Jun 5, 2024

Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features

The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards."

"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."

"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."

"I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize."

"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."

"The technical support is excellent."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."

More SAS Data Management pros

Cons

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process."

"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."

"One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place."

"Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."

"The solution could use better documentation."

More SAS Data Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

30%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAS Data Management?

I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments. This model ensures continuous updates and support while managing initial setup costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement. A more seamless integration process and transitioning to a cloud-based environment would enhance user-friendliness ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 18% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 16% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 15% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

More FME Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 19% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 14% of the time

Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

November 2024

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

October 2024

Download SAS Data Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Learn More

Safe Software

SAS

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. SAS Data Management

October 2024

Free Report: FME vs. SAS Data Management

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. SAS Data Management report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.