FME vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Safe Software and Salesforce are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.7, while Salesforce is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Safe Software holds a 2.0% mindshare in DI, compared to Salesforce’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,692 Views
2,001 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

371 Views
298 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FME

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and MuleSoft Composer compete in data integration and automation. MuleSoft Composer appears to have an edge due to its advanced features, which justify its higher cost for some users.

Features: FME offers a user-friendly interface requiring minimal coding, extensive connectors for diverse data types, and excellent spatial data transformation capabilities paired with robust error detection. On the other hand, MuleSoft Composer provides seamless API integration across various databases, comprehensive prebuilt connectors, and a well-organized integration process suitable for cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: FME could benefit from enhanced cloud integration options, more advanced data analytics capabilities, and improved support for non-spatial data integrations. For MuleSoft Composer, enhancements could include reducing its initial learning curve, better documentation for new users, and expanding support for non-cloud-based systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME ensures easy deployment with strong customer support, making it accessible across many environments. MuleSoft Composer simplifies deployment with its cloud-centric approach but may require more training to maximize its functionality, offering flexibility for businesses seeking rapid scalability.

Pricing and ROI: FME provides competitive initial pricing, delivering strong ROI in spatial data management. MuleSoft Composer, although it may involve a more significant initial investment, can offer substantial long-term ROI for enterprises needing extensive cloud-based integrations, in line with its advanced feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 830,726 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (14th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

Cons

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price is reasonable."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

28%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 22% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 15% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

More FME Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 56% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

January 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

December 2024

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

No data available

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Learn More

Safe Software

Salesforce

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. MuleSoft Composer

January 2025

Free Report: FME vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.