Contrast Security Assess vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Contrast Security and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Contrast Security is ranked #29, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Contrast Security holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Contrast Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Contrast Security Assess

Read 11 Contrast Security Assess reviews

2,206 Views
1,478 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

5,991 Views
3,774 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Assess

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Contrast Security Assess are tools in the web application security testing category. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional appears to have the upper hand in competitive pricing and user satisfaction in support, while Contrast Security Assess is noted for having advanced features and perceived value.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is recognized for its comprehensive manual testing tools, integration capabilities, and extensive functionality for testing web applications. Contrast Security Assess is distinguished by automatic vulnerability detection, a robust set of integrations, and ease of use in continuous integration workflows.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users suggest enhancements in reducing false positives, improving automated scanning capabilities, and increasing customization options. Contrast Security Assess users recommend refining customization options, streamlining setup complexity, and offering more scalable solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is known for its easy deployment process and reliable customer support. Contrast Security Assess provides smooth deployment in integrated environments, though it may need additional support resources for optimal use.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is recognized for cost-effectiveness and delivering strong ROI, with users quickly benefiting from initial investments. Contrast Security Assess, while higher in cost, justifies its expense through outstanding features that offer substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

27th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	2.7%
Contrast Security Assess	1.3%
Other	96.0%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

ToddMcAlister

Lead Application and Data Security Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It has an excellent API interface to pull APIs.

Assess has brought our development time down because it helps create code the first time. Instead of going through the Jenkins process to build an application, they can see right off the bat that if there are errors in the code and fix them before it even goes to build.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the Contrast OSS feature that allows us to look at third-party, open-source software libraries, because it has a cool interface where you can look at all the different libraries. It has some really cool additional features where it gives us how many instances in which something has been used... It tells us it has been used 10 times out of 20 workloads, for example. Then we know for sure that OSS is being used."

"When we access the application, it continuously monitors and detects vulnerabilities."

"The time it saves us is on the order of one US-based FTE, a security person at an average pay level, and at a bare minimum Contrast helps us like that resource; it's like having a CISSP guy, in the US, on our payroll."

"The accuracy of the solution in identifying vulnerabilities is better than any other product we've used, far and away. In our internal comparisons among different tools, Contrast consistently finds more impactful vulnerabilities, and also identifies vulnerabilities that are nearly guaranteed to be there, meaning that the chance of false positives is very low."

"Contrast was a very complete solution; it met all of our technical requirements and it was really the only IAST product that felt like a real product."

"It is a stable solution...Contrast Security Assess is one of the first players in this market, so they have experience and customers, especially abroad. Overall, it's a good product."

"By far, the thing that was able to provide value was the immediate response while testing ahead of release, in real-time."

"From a percentage perspective, somewhere around 90 percent of the time we used to spend has been given back to our team, because the false positive rate with Contrast is less than 5 percent."

More Contrast Security Assess pros

"One useful function is the ability to send requests to the repeater without making actual requests through the browser, allowing me to modify requests easily."

"This is one of the best tools that I'm using; I found this one much better."

"The Repeater and the BApp extensions are particularly useful. Certain extensions, such as the Active Scan extensions and the Autoracer extension, are very good."

"It offers flexibility, macros, and features to reduce the effort required for authenticated sessions."

"Burp has several good features; it's cheaper than other solutions and you can scan any number of applications and it updates its database."

"The product has a good learning hub."

"This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps."

"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The solution should provide more details in the section where it shows that third-party libraries have CVEs or some vulnerabilities."

"I would like to see them come up with more scanning rules."

"The solution needs to improve flexibility...The scalability of the product is a problem in the solution, especially from a commercial perspective."

"The out-of-the-box reporting could be improved. We need to write our own APIs to make the reporting more robust."

"My primary hurdle is that it doesn't support all of the technologies that we use."

"Regarding the solution's OSS feature, the one drawback that we do have is that it does not have client-side support. We'll be missing identification of libraries like jQuery or JavaScript, and such, that are client-side."

"The out-of-the-box reporting could be improved. We need to write our own APIs to make the reporting more robust."

"I think there was activity underway to support the centralized configuration control. There are ways to do it, but I think they were productizing more of that."

More Contrast Security Assess cons

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services."

"It would be good if the solution could give us more details about what exactly is defective."

"In general, there's not much to complain about but the stability of the tool is not good enough."

"There could be an improvement in the API security testing."

"Integration is a big problem."

"The tool is very expensive."

"The technical support team's response time is mostly delayed and should be improved."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The good news is that the agent itself comes in two different forms: the unlicensed form and the licensed form. Unlicensed gives use of that software composition analysis for free. Thereafter, if you apply a license to that same agent, that's when the instrumentation takes hold. So one of my suggestions is to do what we're doing: Deploy the agent to as many applications as possible, with just the SCA feature turned on with no license applied, and then you can be more choosy and pick which teams will get the license applied."

"The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"You only get one license for an application. Ours are very big, monolithic applications with millions of lines of code. We were able to apply one license to one monolithic application, which is great. We are happy with the licensing. Pricing-wise, they are industry-standard, which is fine."

"I like the per-application licensing model... We just license the app and we look at different vulnerabilities on that app and we remediate within the app. It's simpler."

"It's a tiered licensing model. The more you buy, as you cross certain quantity thresholds, the pricing changes. If you have a smaller environment, your licensing costs are going to be different than a larger environment... The licensing is primarily per application. An application can be as many agents as you need. If you've got 10 development servers and 20 production servers and 50 QA servers, all of those agents can be reporting as a single application that utilizes one license."

"For what it offers, it's a very reasonable cost. The way that it is priced is extremely straightforward. It works on the number of applications that you use, and you license a server. It is something that is extremely fair, because it doesn't take into consideration the number of requests, etc. It is only priced based on the number of onboarded applications. It suits our model as well, because we have huge traffic. Our number of applications is not that large, so the pricing works great for us."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"For a country such as Sri Lanka, the pricing is not reasonable."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"This is a value for money product."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Digital.ai Application Security vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

FortiDevSec vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 4% of the time

More Contrast Security Assess Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess

March 2026

Download Contrast Security Assess product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Contrast Assess

Burp

Overview

Contrast Security is the world’s leading provider of security technology that enables software applications to protect themselves against cyberattacks, heralding the new era of self-protecting software. Contrast's patented deep security instrumentation is the breakthrough technology that enables highly accurate assessment and always-on protection of an entire application portfolio, without disruptive scanning or expensive security experts. Only Contrast has sensors that work actively inside applications to uncover vulnerabilities, prevent data breaches, and secure the entire enterprise from development, to operations, to production.

Contrast Security

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Free Report: Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Contrast Security Assess vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.