

Control-M and Globalscape EFT are competitors in the enterprise automation and secure file transfer sectors. While Control-M is preferable for organizations seeking extensive workload automation, Globalscape EFT is ideal for businesses needing secure file transfer solutions.
Features: Control-M offers significant automation capabilities across multiple platforms, providing integration with various applications like SAP and file transfers. It includes control modules for seamless operations and high availability in complex environments. Globalscape EFT excels in secure managed file transfers, emphasizing workflow automation and encryption for enhanced security and compliance. It integrates efficiently with diverse systems and supports advanced automation rules.
Room for Improvement: Control-M users suggest enhanced reporting capabilities, better integration of its modules, and more affordable pricing as potential areas for improvement. Licensing costs are noted as high, with desires for easier upgrades and reporting tools. Globalscape EFT could benefit from improved monitoring services, support for larger file transfers, and better integration with existing systems. Cost issues and challenges with auditing and volume management are also noted.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is typically deployed on-premises and is gaining traction in hybrid cloud environments. It is known for responsive technical support, though documentation and advanced troubleshooting could improve. Globalscape EFT, deployable on-premises and in the public cloud, offers a simpler licensing approach and competitive pricing. Its reliable support is acknowledged, though quicker resolution times for issues and better administrative tools are desired.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M, regarded as a premium product, is often priced based on job or task volume, which may deter smaller organizations. Despite high initial costs, users recognize ROI through efficiency and automation. Globalscape EFT, with its straightforward server-based license model, is considered more cost-effective, offering substantial value for secure file transactions. It remains popular with organizations focused on price-value balance for secure data management.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
It has custom reports which are inbuilt, showing things such as how many files are going through, what the file sizes are, and if any invalid logins have happened.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
A quicker response would be appreciated.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
While I sometimes find difficulties with GCP, it works fine and flawlessly on AWS, especially since we have a large customer base and vendors where we send numerous files daily.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Sometimes we encounter error logging issues or the system goes down, requiring us to connect with the cloud engineer.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
If I'm transferring large batches, it takes them in threads. Globalscape EFT uploads the files on a threading basis, such as 100 files at a time, and the rest of the files will be in a queue system.
Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
It operates as a pay-as-you-go model.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
It is flexible because you can modify many aspects in Globalscape EFT.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 4.2% |
| Globalscape EFT | 4.1% |
| Other | 91.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 136 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
Globalscape EFT, a robust file transfer platform, offers ease of setup, strong security, and user-friendly automation features suitable for secure data exchange across Windows and Linux environments.
Globalscape EFT supports centralized management, strong security protocols, and simplified automation, making it an ideal choice for businesses requiring secure file transfers. It integrates seamlessly with Active Directory and provides advanced features like PGP encryption, API support, and compliance controls. Users appreciate its efficient setup process, graphical interface, and reliable customer service. However, there is a need for enhancements in cloud capabilities, faster file transfers, and a transition to a web-based admin. Challenges include folder monitoring, concurrent use issues, and complex upgrades in high-availability environments. Users seek improved alert systems and reporting capabilities.
What are the most important features?Industries rely on Globalscape EFT for secure file exchanges, SFTP storage, and file encryption, integrating it with diverse systems for custom automation. Common uses include internal/external file transfers, compliance reporting, and secure communications across regions. It's implemented in both on-prem and cloud settings, maintaining managed file transmissions for multiple sites.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.