Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cortex XSIAM vs Securonix SOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (29th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (10th)
Securonix SOAR
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cortex XSIAM is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 1.7%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Securonix SOAR, on the other hand, focuses on Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR), holds 0.2% mindshare, down 0.8% since last year.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Forrest Stevens - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 28, 2023
A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability
There is room for improvement in some areas, and I would highlight three key aspects. Firstly, the Attack Surface Management (ASM) module could benefit from more contextual depth. Currently, it tends to provide a broad overview without enriched context, and there's room for enhancement in this regard. Secondly, further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous. This would enhance its versatility and interoperability within a broader ecosystem. Regarding performance, there's potential for optimization. When multiple tabs are open in Cortex XSIAM, it can experience slowdowns, leading to longer load times for web pages. It's worth noting that this isn't a severe issue, and it doesn't entail waiting for extended periods, but there is room for improvement in terms of performance optimization.
Use Securonix SOAR?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."
"The product cost could be considered value for money compared to other solutions in the market, though it is quite high."
"Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."
"In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."
"The solution comes at a significant cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cortex XSIAM?
It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?
We do not deal with licensing. Only the accounts team handles that information.
What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?
I am not sure if any improvements are needed right now. The current features are satisfactory, and new features are implemented following customer feature requests.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Securonix Security Orchestration Automation and Response
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Intermountain Healthcare, Pfizer
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.