We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Securonix Solutions and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)."It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities."
"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."
"It operates on a single, extensive database which enables it to excel in detecting threats and anomalies across the network and endpoints, delivering a highly effective and comprehensive security solution."
"The strengths of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR stem from the fact that it provides functionalities related to patching and URL blocking...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"It is a scalable solution. I would rate scalability a ten out of ten."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure."
"The solution is very reliable."
"It’s easy to install."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The support could be a bit faster."
"Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous."
"The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."
"The solution’s pricing and technical support could be improved."
"The dashboard performance could be improved."
"The platform’s setup procedures could be streamlined compared to one of its competitors."
"The solution’s price and technical support could be improved."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the Panorama feature. We had to turn it off because it was not working properly."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"Palo Alto needs to develop more AI-centric products."
"I would love to see more flexibility on what we can display and design on the dashboards."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cortex XSIAM is ranked 7th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 4 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 42 reviews. Cortex XSIAM is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cortex XSIAM writes "A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Cortex XSIAM is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, IBM Security QRadar, CrowdStrike Falcon and Exabeam Fusion SIEM, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Swimlane and ServiceNow Security Operations.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.