Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Couchbase Capella vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Couchbase Capella
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MongoDB Atlas
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Managed NoSQL Databases (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Couchbase Capella is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 16.6%, up from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

SupriyaKulkarni - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 4, 2024
Good GUI, easy to learn, and simple to install
The architecture is complex. I do understand that. However, the GUI is very user-friendly. Sometimes all these things are a little difficult to understand for a person who is not experienced in Couchbase. There is a constant requirement to upgrade the versions. We need to constantly keep on upgrading the latest version for the newest one. Currently, we are dealing with an issue where some of the servers are on the 6.5 version, and a few have moved to 7.5. So we are in a mixed mode right now. We are having a high IO issue on our servers, which we are already dealing with. We have these cases with Couchbase, with Red Hat, et cetera. We feel like this constant need to upgrade is something that is very mundane yet a very difficult task. If you have three clusters, which have around thirty nodes, the data is quite sensitive. Whenever there is Couchbase upgrade that is going on, we see that our SR is dropped. The purchase rate and success rate drop. This affects our business and the clients. Rebalancing could be improved. I find it to be a very slow process when it comes to rebalancing the clusters. If you talk about other architectures like Oracle, they are pretty fast. Couchbase is a little slower. Rebalancing, taking the node out, doing the upgrade, putting it back, rebalancing it, is a very difficult and cumbersome. For Oracle, we have been running on version 19.5 for the past five years. There were absolutely no issues. Yet for Couchbase, every six months, we have to go do the upgrade.
IB
Jan 26, 2024
Offers seamless support for diverse data structures and simplifies compliance
MongoDB's default encryption provides a baseline for data protection. The flexibility to let customers manage their encryption keys enhances security. MongoDB Atlas supports our organization's implementation of microservices architecture by seamlessly fitting into our domain-driven design. While we primarily use domain-driven design rather than microservices, MongoDB Atlas offers flexibility and scalability to meet various requirements. It easily accommodates diverse data structures and events related to our customers, allowing for efficient and straightforward implementation. Overall, I would rate MongoDB Atlas as a seven out of ten. My advice to new users is to design your schema thoughtfully, considering MongoDB's document limitations. Utilize profiling and set up alerts for scaling issues. Understand how to query efficiently and focus on proper indexing for improved performance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The way the nodes are managed is interesting."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The auto-scaling feature is the most valuable aspect."
"What I found most valuable in MongoDB Atlas is its Elasticsearch feature. It also has high availability, so it's stable."
"As a tester, it was easy to validate data, access data, make active run queries against it, and retrieve data from it."
"The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am happy with the automated backup and restore functionality."
"Administering the solution is easy."
"Our databases used to be in-house. Now, they are in the cloud with MongoDB and everything is much easier."
"MongoDB Atlas is a database that is quite fast, stable, and reliable."
"It has a flexible integration with our easy API."
 

Cons

"Rebalancing could be improved."
"The product could be improved by including a log section for tracking activities, enhancing database integration, and providing more transparency regarding pricing and monitoring activities."
"The import and export process needs improvement, i.e., getting in and out. Moving data from other databases into MongoDB, along with indexing, was challenging."
"The replica side, like the venue, can be improved."
"Based on its own habitat, it's not ACID compliant. If it had an ACID compliant option, it would be more useful for database administration."
"The product's file storage documentation needs improvement."
"There are some features that could be useful for the customers I work with, which are related to migration from on-prem to the cloud."
"The product's data aggregation feature needs to work faster."
"Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier."
"The installation was straightforward except for the network hardware because it was a little complicated to make the connection with our VPC on AWS."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing could always be better."
"MongoDB Atlas is not expensive, and since it's a cloud-based solution, you pay by usage."
"In my previous company, the product allowed use to build a database in a highly regulated environment with the ability to get distributed storage. We used MongoDB as a distributed storage to set up this environment for a critical business application with millions of dollars."
"The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."
"For me, MongoDB is expensive, but I think it is not so expensive for customers."
"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."
"The pricing and licensing is great."
"The solution is fairly priced. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Couchbase Capella?
The product could be improved by including a log section for tracking activities, enhancing database integration, and providing more transparency regarding pricing and monitoring activities.
What is your primary use case for Couchbase Capella?
We use the platform to transfer product pricing, discounts, product types, and location details to different stores.
What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Atlas
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service (DBaaS). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.