Coverity vs HCL AppScan comparison

Black Duck and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while HCLSoftware is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.9. Black Duck holds a 8.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

13,639 Views
9,320 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

4,450 Views
3,412 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Coverity

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Coverity compete in the application security space. User feedback suggests HCL AppScan often holds an advantage in comprehensive reporting and flexibility, while Coverity is preferred for its deep static analysis capabilities. HCL AppScan may offer better pricing options and quicker setup, but Coverity's robust feature set validates its higher cost.

Features: HCL AppScan is noted for customizable scanning capabilities, making it versatile. It provides flexibility for various environments and comprehensive reporting. Coverity is recognized for detailed code analysis, seamless workflow integration, and a focus on accuracy, benefiting those prioritizing code quality.

Room for Improvement: Users recommend HCL AppScan improve scan speed, real-time protection, and performance enhancements. Coverity could enhance reporting features, configuration controls, and accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is praised for straightforward deployment and helpful customer support. Coverity, while efficient after deployment, requires a longer initial setup. Both offer adequate customer service, though Coverity customers prefer a quicker initial rollout.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan provides attractive setup costs and a quicker ROI with competitive pricing. Coverity, despite its higher initial cost, offers significant long-term value through accuracy and reduced maintenance demands, appealing to organizations focused on precision.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. HCL AppScan

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (15th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.5%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

AnshulTomar

Cyber Security Architect and Presales Consultant at Kyndryl

Scalable platform with efficient static and dynamic testing features

We use the product for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). By integrating AppScan into our CI/CD pipelines, aligned with Agile methodologies, we ensure that security testing becomes an integral part of the software development lifecycle The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has the lowest false positives."

"I like Coverity's capability to scan codes once we push it. We don't need more time to review our colleagues' codes. Its UI is pretty straightforward."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The app analysis is the most valuable feature as I know other solutions don't have that."

"What I find most effective about Coverity is its low rate of false positives. I've seen other platforms with many false positives, but with Coverity, most vulnerabilities it identifies are genuine. This allows me to focus on real issues."

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Jenkins."

"The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at."

More Coverity pros

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI."

"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production."

"It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end."

"This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"I had tried integrating the tool with Azure DevOps, but the report I got stated that my team faced many challenges."

"We use GitHub and Gitflow, and Coverity does not fit with Gitflow. I have to create a screen for our branches, and it's a pain for developers. It has been difficult to integrate Coverity with our system."

"They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier."

"The level of vulnerability that this solution covers could be improved compared to other open source tools."

"Sometimes, vulnerabilities remain unidentified even after setting up the rules."

"The solution is a bit complex to use in comparison to other products that have many plugins."

"Coverity is far from perfection, and I'm not 100 percent sure it's helping me find what I need to find in my role. We need exactly what we are looking for, i.e. security errors and vulnerabilities. It doesn't seem to be reporting while we are changing our code."

"Coverity is not a user-friendly product."

More Coverity cons

"I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point."

"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"AppScan is too complicated and should be made more user-friendly."

"I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers."

"The pricing has room for improvement."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool was fairly priced."

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is low, and ten is high price."

"The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

"The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The tool was expensive."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 53% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

December 2024

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

December 2024

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Learn More

Black Duck

HCLSoftware

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. HCL AppScan

December 2024

Free Report: Coverity vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.