Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coverity vs Synopsys API Security Testing comparison

Coverity and Synopsys API Security Testing are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Coverity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Synopsys API Security Testing is ranked #36. Coverity holds a 8.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Synopsys API Security Testing’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Coverity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Synopsys API Security Testing users who would recommend it.
Coverity
Read 42 Coverity reviews
  • 13,201 Views
  • 9,033 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Synopsys API Security Testing
Read 1 Synopsys API Security Testing review
  • 240 Views
  • 183 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Coverity and Synopsys API Security Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Coverity
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Synopsys API Security Testing
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
36th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.3%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Synopsys API Security Testing is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability
The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.
Read full review
UmarQureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support
We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Coverity is easy to use and easy to integrate with CI."
"The most valuable feature of Coverity is that it shows examples of what is actually wrong with the code."
"Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked."
"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent."
"The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space."
"It's pretty stable. I rate the stability of Coverity nine out of ten."
"Provides software security, and helps to find potential security bugs or defects."
"The solution effectively identifies bugs in code."
More Coverity pros
"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."
 

Cons

"The solution could use more rules."
"Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers."
"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."
"Its price can be improved. Price is always an issue with Synopsys."
"We're currently facing a primary challenge with automation using Coverity. Each developer has a license and can perform manual checks, and we also have a nightly build that analyzes the entire software. The main issue is that the tool can't look behind submodules in our code base, so it doesn't see changes stored there."
"Coverity concerns its dashboards and reporting."
"I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse."
"Sometimes it's a bit hard to figure out how to use the product’s UI."
More Coverity cons
"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."
"The tool was fairly priced."
"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"The price is competitive with other solutions."
"Coverity is very expensive."
"Offers varying prices for different companies"
"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."
"The solution is affordable."
More Coverity pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
32%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
4%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
What do you like most about Coverity?
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?
I do not know about the pricing.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity
Compared 53% of the time
Klocwork vs Coverity Logo
Klocwork vs Coverity
Compared 7% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Coverity Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Coverity
Compared 6% of the time
Veracode vs Coverity Logo
Veracode vs Coverity
Compared 5% of the time
Checkmarx One vs Coverity Logo
Checkmarx One vs Coverity
Compared 5% of the time
More Coverity Competitors
Seeker vs Synopsys API Security Testing Logo
Seeker vs Synopsys API Security Testing
Compared 45% of the time
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing Logo
Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing
Compared 32% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing Logo
OWASP Zap vs Synopsys API Security Testing
Compared 23% of the time
More Synopsys API Security Testing Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Coverity
January 2025
Coverity reportDownload Coverity product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
December 2024
Synopsys API Security Testing reportDownload Synopsys API Security Testing product report
 

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis
No data available
 

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts. 

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck
 

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.