Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

CrowdStrike and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Trellix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.6. CrowdStrike holds a 11.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
CrowdStrike Falcon
Read 123 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews
  • 29,093 Views
  • 21,501 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 6,318 Views
  • 4,828 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

CrowdStrike Falcon and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are top competitors in the endpoint security market. CrowdStrike Falcon often leads with its usability and threat detection, while Trellix ENS is praised for its comprehensive features and overall value.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon includes advanced threat intelligence, responsive capabilities, and a cloud-based architecture for real-time visibility. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive protection features like anti-malware, firewall, and web control, providing a broad range of basic security functionalities.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve integration with other tools, detailed reporting, and third-party integrations. Trellix ENS needs enhancements in user experience, performance optimization, and system performance impact reduction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for straightforward, cloud-based deployment and robust customer support. Trellix ENS receives mixed reviews on deployment complexity but benefits from in-depth documentation and support services. CrowdStrike offers easier deployment and quicker support responses compared to Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon, typically more expensive, provides justifiable ROI due to effective threat prevention. Trellix ENS has a more cost-effective setup and good ROI with its expansive feature set despite higher complexity. CrowdStrike's high performance correlates with higher costs, while Trellix provides broad features at a more accessible price point.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,997 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CrowdStrike Falcon enhances efficiency, reduces costs and resources, boosts security, and increases ROI by preventing breaches and downtime.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust protection with reduced threat response time and ROI, despite high costs and occasional inaccuracies.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
CrowdStrike Falcon's customer service is praised for expertise and promptness but varies in responsiveness outside regular hours.
Sentiment score
7.9
Trellix ENS support is praised for 24/7 access but criticized for delays, regional disparities, and module compatibility issues.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the CrowdStrike Falcon report
They were fairly responsive and able to resolve the issue.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
CrowdStrike Falcon offers scalable, cloud-based security, easily handling thousands of endpoints with efficient growth management and platform flexibility.
Sentiment score
8.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is praised for its scalability and ease of deployment, though expertise is needed for optimal configuration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for stability and efficiency, with minor issues swiftly resolved, earning high user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is generally stable and reliable, with deployment challenges but receiving regular updates and solid ratings.
 

Room For Improvement

Users desire improved integration, expanded features, user-friendliness, enhanced support, and competitive pricing for CrowdStrike Falcon.
Trellix ENS needs improved compatibility, UI, performance, customization, support, integration, pricing, and automation to meet user expectations.
 

Setup Cost

CrowdStrike Falcon is viewed as expensive, yet justifiable for its strong security and flexible licensing options.
Trellix ENS offers competitive pricing and value, with scalable discounts and essential features, despite not being the cheapest.
 

Valuable Features

CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection, minimal system impact, continuous updates, and user-friendly features for seamless workflow.
Trellix Endpoint Security provides comprehensive threat protection, centralized management, and AI-driven capabilities for robust network security and usability.
Real-time response (RTR) is a feature of EDR.
For more quotes and insights, download the CrowdStrike Falcon report
Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
3rd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
23rd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 11.1%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Nov 06, 2021
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful tool for securing computers from malware and viruses. All of the information that you need is gathered in a central location for careful analysis. It is also easy to navigate, which is a big plus in its favor. Crowdstrike Falcon also offers the ability to access its protective software anywhere on the planet that has a connection to the internet. This makes it an easily accessible anti-malware program. The cloud component of the program makes it especially useful for large organizations. In a world where remote work is a crucial addition to companies of various sizes, unlimited access to software that can secure the future of their organization is crucial. A large staff will now have the ability to continue their business without the fear of malicious actors. A further aspect of the program which is impressive is its ability to both provide real-time data and at the same time keep the hardware running at normal speed. It maximizes security while not sacrificing the speed of the work that the user is trying to accomplish. These two aspects make Crowdstrike Falcon the type of program that has a clear advantage over its competitors. FireEye Endpoint Security offers its users the ability to integrate itself with other environments and software. This provides a level of flexibility that is valuable in any sort of software, much less an anti-viral program. It also has a simplicity of use and precision in spotting unknown malware. All of these qualities make it a pretty effective piece of software. However, FireEye does not offer a cloud option like Crowdstrike Falcon does. This serves to limit its usefulness to companies that operate remotely. Conclusion Crowdstrike Falcon definitely offers a flexible and versatile program that has much to offer for the relatively low price being paid. FireEye Endpoint Security lacks the cloud compatibility of Crowdstrike Falcon. Overall, Crowdstrike Falcon seems to be the far more effective software.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option
Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.
Read full review
Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

NC
Nov 6, 2021
Nov 6, 2021
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful tool for securing computers from malware and viruses. All of the information that you need is gathered in a central location for careful analysis. It is also easy to navigate, which is a big plus in its ...
See 2 answers
DG
Oct 14, 2021
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful tool for securing computers from malware and viruses. All of the information that you need is gathered in a central location for careful analysis. It is also easy to navigate, which is a big plus in its favor. Crowdstrike Falcon also offers the ability to access its protective software anywhere on the planet that has a connection to the internet. This makes it an easily accessible anti-malware program. The cloud component of the program makes it especially useful for large organizations. In a world where remote work is a crucial addition to companies of various sizes, unlimited access to software that can secure the future of their organization is crucial. A large staff will now have the ability to continue their business without the fear of malicious actors. A further aspect of the program which is impressive is its ability to both provide real-time data and at the same time keep the hardware running at normal speed. It maximizes security while not sacrificing the speed of the work that the user is trying to accomplish. These two aspects make Crowdstrike Falcon the type of program that has a clear advantage over its competitors. FireEye Endpoint Security offers its users the ability to integrate itself with other environments and software. This provides a level of flexibility that is valuable in any sort of software, much less an anti-viral program. It also has a simplicity of use and precision in spotting unknown malware. All of these qualities make it a pretty effective piece of software. However, FireEye does not offer a cloud option like Crowdstrike Falcon does. This serves to limit its usefulness to companies that operate remotely. Conclusion Crowdstrike Falcon definitely offers a flexible and versatile program that has much to offer for the relatively low price being paid. FireEye Endpoint Security lacks the cloud compatibility of Crowdstrike Falcon. Overall, Crowdstrike Falcon seems to be the far more effective software.
Read full answer
JR
Nov 6, 2021
Hello, I think it doesn't make sense to just compare device protection and automated response security solutions, it's missing to protect identities, devices, and insider access. I think: The best and most valuable option is Microsoft. Microsoft 365 Defender is a unified pre- and post-breach enterprise defense suite that natively coordinates detection, prevention, investigation, and response across endpoints, identities, email, and applications to provide integrated protection against sophisticated attacks. With the integrated Microsoft 365 Defender solution, security professionals can stitch together the threat signals that each of these products receive and determine the full scope and impact of the threat; how it entered the environment, what it's affected, and how it's currently impacting the organization. Microsoft 365 Defender takes automatic action to prevent or stop the attack and self-heal affected mailboxes, endpoints, and user identities. Microsoft 365 Defender services includes:1. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, is an enterprise endpoint security platform designed to help enterprise networks prevent, detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats.2. Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Plan 1 protects email and collaboration from zero-day malware, phish, and business email compromise,  Plan 2 adds post-breach investigation, hunting, and response, as well as automation, and simulation (for training).3. Microsoft Defender for Identity, a cloud service that helps protect your enterprise hybrid environments from multiple types of advanced targeted cyber-attacks and insider threats.4. Microsoft Cloud App Security, is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that operates on multiple clouds. It provides rich visibility, control over data travel, and sophisticated analytics to identify and combat cyber threats across all your cloud services. If the end customer already has Microsoft 365 in companies or educational institutions, they already have the collaboration tools, only the security and endpoint management tools should be added, all with Microsoft 365 E5/A5, no more investment is being made, it is being consolidated, visibility is gained, responses are automated, the fatigue of operating so many security events that you do not have the time or personnel to review them decrease. I hope this has generated value for you.
Read full answer
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?
Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?
The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
Compared 6% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon
Compared 4% of the time
Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon
Compared 4% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon
Compared 3% of the time
More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 17% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 15% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 6% of the time
Open EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Open EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 5% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon
January 2025
CrowdStrike Falcon reportDownload CrowdStrike Falcon product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
January 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
 

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

  • Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
  • Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
  • Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
  • Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
  • Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
  • Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
  • Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
  • Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

  • Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
  • Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
  • Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
  • Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
  • Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
January 2025
Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.