Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo

Top 10 CrowdStrike Falcon Alternatives

Vendor: CrowdStrike
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
4,557 followers
Start review

Top CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CrowdStrike Falcon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiEDR, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. CrowdStrike Falcon surpasses its competitors by offering advanced AI-driven threat detection, real-time analytics, and seamless cloud integration, ensuring optimal cybersecurity and rapid response times for businesses seeking robust protection against evolving threats.

CrowdStrike Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CrowdStrike, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers strong detection with proactive threat hunting across operating systems. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in seamless integration with Microsoft products, providing robust AI-driven threat protection. CrowdStrike's enterprise-level pricing contrasts with Defender's cost-effectiveness within Microsoft suites.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon reports lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a key differing factor in initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon reports lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting a key differing factor in initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced real-time threat analysis with minimal system impact, attracting businesses that prioritize AI-driven protection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers robust integration and threat management, making it appealing for companies needing detailed forensics and seamless security solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a high initial setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is known for its more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a high initial setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is known for its more budget-friendly setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in AI-driven ransomware remediation and behavior-based security, minimizing cloud dependency. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon emphasizes its cloud-native architecture, providing real-time detection. Tech buyers might choose SentinelOne for automation or CrowdStrike for agility across environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete setup is noted to be straightforward and efficient, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a more complex setup process leading to additional time considerations. SentinelOne is preferred for ease, while CrowdStrike may suit environments looking for comprehensive ...
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete setup is noted to be straightforward and efficient, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a more complex setup process leading to additional time considerations. SentinelOne is preferred for ease, while CrowdStrike may suit environments looking for comprehensive ...
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint detection, offering advanced threat remediation and forensic capabilities, with seamless integration across security tools. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR is noted for ease of use within the Microsoft ecosystem, leveraging AI and machine learning for comprehensive threat protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost with comprehensive security features, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising basic protection.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost with comprehensive security features, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more budget-friendly setup without compromising basic protection.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced real-time threat detection and a lightweight design, ideal for quick deployments. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels with integration across Cisco's suite, providing extensive threat visibility and Talos intelligence, beneficial for organizations using Cisco's broader security ecosystem.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint may involve more complex expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint may involve more complex expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar focuses on scalability and comprehensive compliance monitoring, offering robust log management. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon emphasizes real-time threat detection with cloud-native flexibility, providing seamless threat response. Tech buyers may choose QRadar for log management or Falcon for threat detection capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more budget-friendly installation. QRadar's robust features may justify the cost, while Falcon focuses on affordability with streamlined setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more budget-friendly installation. QRadar's robust features may justify the cost, while Falcon focuses on affordability with streamlined setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in AI-driven threat detection and endpoint protection, offering seamless operations. In comparison, Elastic Security is valued for its open-source flexibility, allowing extensive customization. CrowdStrike offers premium solutions, while Elastic provides cost-effective security without heavy licensing fees.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Elastic Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, highlighting a difference in initial investment. Elastic Security offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, highlighting a difference in initial investment. Elastic Security offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
Lookout targets mobile security with strong data protection and threat detection ideal for businesses prioritizing mobile device safety. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence and cross-device capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive endpoint protection and robust features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Lookout Report
Lookout offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher initial expenses due to their comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher initial expenses due to their comprehensive feature set.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium offers comprehensive endpoint management with real-time data, while CrowdStrike Falcon's cloud-based threat detection enables proactive threat hunting. In comparison, Tanium’s on-premise setup requires more resources, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon's cloud deployment ensures easier, swift integration for technical buyers.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable implementation.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced endpoint detection with real-time AI threat monitoring. In comparison, Sophos Intercept X excels in malware and ransomware protection, featuring strong machine learning capabilities. Buyers may choose Falcon for comprehensive EDR and remote access or Sophos for pricing and integration simplicity.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs an initial setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a straightforward setup process. CrowdStrike Falcon users report more streamlined management compared to the in-depth installation procedures noted for Intercept X Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs an initial setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint offers a straightforward setup process. CrowdStrike Falcon users report more streamlined management compared to the in-depth installation procedures noted for Intercept X Endpoint.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers strong integration and comprehensive threat protection features. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced AI-driven detection and behavior-based capabilities. Trend Vision One provides flexible pricing, while CrowdStrike Falcon delivers premium protection with a higher cost.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a higher setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a higher setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security offers robust malware protection with extensive Windows integration and scalability. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's lightweight agent provides advanced threat detection without relying on signatures. Tech buyers may prefer Kaspersky for enterprise environments, while CrowdStrike is favored for cloud deployments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers more budget-friendly setup options, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs a higher setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon offers more budget-friendly setup options, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for budget-conscious businesses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon appeals to those valuing advanced threat detection and quick cloud-based deployment. In comparison, HP Wolf Security attracts buyers with its cost-efficient, hardware-enforced solutions and robust isolation technology, offering significant protection benefits for security-focused organizations.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. HP Wolf Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher upfront setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher upfront setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers an AI-driven, lightweight EDR with real-time threat capabilities. In comparison, Trend Vision One provides integrated XDR across multiple layers. CrowdStrike emphasizes threat intelligence, while Trend Vision One focuses on extensive integration and centralized visibility.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One, which offers a more affordable initial expense, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher compared to Trend Vision One, which offers a more affordable initial expense, making it a more budget-friendly option.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive endpoint security with features like anti-ransomware and compliance, favored for detailed threat emulation. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR with strong cloud-native threat detection, appealing to buyers prioritizing advanced functionalities despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon comes with higher initial expenses. Customer reviews indicate a significant price difference favoring Check Point Harmony Endpoint for those concerned with budget efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has lower initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon comes with higher initial expenses. Customer reviews indicate a significant price difference favoring Check Point Harmony Endpoint for those concerned with budget efficiency.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides extensive endpoint visibility, AI-driven threat detection, and minimal performance impact. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR excels in threat hunting and offers cost-effective security. Buyers might select Falcon for comprehensive protection or Huntress for its scalability and affordability.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a significant setup cost compared to Huntress Managed EDR, highlighting a crucial pricing difference between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a significant setup cost compared to Huntress Managed EDR, highlighting a crucial pricing difference between these solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon features strong EDR with threat intelligence, focusing on swift deployment and minimal system impact. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes extensive threat hunting and data analysis, appealing to businesses needing deep insight and comprehensive network threat detection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting their differing approaches to upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting their differing approaches to upfront investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced endpoint detection with machine learning analytics, appealing to those prioritizing immediate protection and response. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR's user behavior analytics and threat intelligence integration suit organizations focusing on comprehensive log management and user insights.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires minimal setup costs, making it appealing for straightforward implementations, while Rapid7 InsightIDR may involve higher initial expenditure due to its comprehensive setup process, highlighting a major difference in initial cost commitment between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires minimal setup costs, making it appealing for straightforward implementations, while Rapid7 InsightIDR may involve higher initial expenditure due to its comprehensive setup process, highlighting a major difference in initial cost commitment between the two.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat intelligence and AI-driven detection, ideal for enterprises needing robust cloud-native response. In comparison, Cynet emphasizes comprehensive protection with user behavior analysis and is suited for smaller businesses seeking competitive pricing and holistic security.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cynet Report
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on advanced security features, while Cynet tends to offer lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for comprehensive coverage without significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on advanced security features, while Cynet tends to offer lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for comprehensive coverage without significant initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust EDR capabilities and AI-driven threat analysis with a focus on real-time response. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR provides strong antivirus protection and affordability, excelling in endpoint security and integration with cloud consoles, making it cost-effective.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which provides a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting the difference in the pricing approach between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, which provides a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting the difference in the pricing approach between the two cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides superior visibility and AI-driven threat remediation with seamless cloud deployment. In comparison, Trellix ENS offers better access control and pricing options attractive to small businesses. A tech buyer might choose CrowdStrike for advanced threat protection and Trellix for cost considerations.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup process with relatively lower initial costs, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) requires a more complex installation that might result in higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup process with relatively lower initial costs, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) requires a more complex installation that might result in higher setup expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5
Cybereason's operation-centric approach provides intuitive threat visualization, making it appealing for those prioritizing clear intel lifecycles. In comparison, CrowdStrike's cloud-native architecture ensures robust threat remediation, offering advantages in responsiveness and real-time responses. Both solutions appeal to different threat management priorities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is noted for having a cost-effective setup, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced feature integration with a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is noted for having a cost-effective setup, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced feature integration with a higher setup cost.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 excels in automated threat detection, offering cost-effective solutions with straightforward deployment and responsive support. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides robust features, emphasizing real-time visibility and extensive threat intelligence, suitable for those seeking comprehensive security and detailed guidance with higher initial investment.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian specializes in endpoint data protection and compliance, appealing to organizations prioritizing data security. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's advanced threat detection and automated monitoring make it preferred for broader security needs despite higher pricing, with efficient cloud-native deployment enhancing its attractiveness for quick implementation.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Digital Guardian Report
Digital Guardian requires a higher initial setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more economical setup option. This difference in upfront investment highlights distinct positioning in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian requires a higher initial setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more economical setup option. This difference in upfront investment highlights distinct positioning in their pricing strategies.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers real-time threat intelligence and cloud-native architecture, making it ideal for extensive security needs. In comparison, Datto EDR excels with automated threat detection and is superior for users integrating with existing Datto services. CrowdStrike provides comprehensive features, while Datto ensures efficient integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a lower initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for immediate deployment, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves higher upfront expenses but may provide more extensive support and customization options for complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a lower initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for immediate deployment, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves higher upfront expenses but may provide more extensive support and customization options for complex environments.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere offers integrated SIEM and vulnerability scanning, appealing to organizations requiring ISO 27001 and PCI compliance. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint protection, ideal for businesses focusing on real-time threat detection and process-based threat identification.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere has an upfront setup cost while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a streamlined setup with zero initial fees, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere has an upfront setup cost while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a streamlined setup with zero initial fees, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two security solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with its cloud-native architecture and effortless deployment, while strong integration capabilities enhance threat management. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers extensive data aggregation and automated analysis, providing flexible customization for complex security needs and a cost-effective entry with strong ROI.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with potentially higher costs, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more affordable installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with potentially higher costs, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more affordable installation process.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection with minimal resource impact. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client, notable for its rollback feature, integrates strong threat protection but may hinder performance. CrowdStrike appeals to those prioritizing efficiency, while SonicWall suits those needing strong rollback.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
CrowdStrike Falcon generally incurs higher setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon generally incurs higher setup costs, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides robust cloud-native capabilities, ideal for those seeking advanced AI-driven threat detection. In comparison, Open EDR offers open-source flexibility for customization. While CrowdStrike ensures seamless cloud deployment, Open EDR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with lower upfront costs.
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs than Open EDR, highlighting its premium positioning. In contrast, Open EDR offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking robust cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs than Open EDR, highlighting its premium positioning. In contrast, Open EDR offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking robust cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint detection and real-time threat response with cloud scalability. In comparison, NetWitness NDR focuses on network traffic monitoring and forensic analysis, providing comprehensive threat intelligence and integration with diverse security infrastructures.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. NetWitness NDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a low setup cost with seamless deployment, while NetWitness NDR involves a higher initial investment with a more complex setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a low setup cost with seamless deployment, while NetWitness NDR involves a higher initial investment with a more complex setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Code42 Incydr
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Code42 Incydr
4.5 out of 5
Code42 Incydr offers real-time data loss detection and endpoint recovery, appealing to those prioritizing data protection and affordability. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon emphasizes threat intelligence and detection, making it ideal for buyers needing advanced security features despite higher upfront costs.
Download Code42 Incydr vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Code42 Incydr has minimal setup costs, making it ideal for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution, while CrowdStrike Falcon involves higher initial expenses reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Code42 Incydr has minimal setup costs, making it ideal for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution, while CrowdStrike Falcon involves higher initial expenses reflecting its advanced security features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced security with real-time monitoring and seamless integration, appealing to large organizations. In comparison, ESET Inspect's advanced detection and forensic capabilities make it attractive for enterprises seeking cost-effective, customizable security solutions with extensive on-premise setup.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Inspect Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers more competitive setup costs, while ESET Inspect requires higher initial investment. CrowdStrike is recognized for its affordability in entry-level pricing compared to ESET's premium setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers more competitive setup costs, while ESET Inspect requires higher initial investment. CrowdStrike is recognized for its affordability in entry-level pricing compared to ESET's premium setup expense.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence and AI-driven detection suitable for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Trellix EDR integrates antivirus functions and external system compatibility, appealing to budget-conscious mid-sized businesses. CrowdStrike requires investment, while Trellix offers cost-effective features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), making it a more budget-friendly option.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers excellent endpoint visibility and remote system analysis, valued for its lightweight nature and cloud-native architecture. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR provides robust threat prevention with strong centralized control, although it is known to be resource-intensive.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a streamlined setup process with minimal initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires a more involved setup with potentially higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a streamlined setup process with minimal initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response requires a more involved setup with potentially higher costs.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive EDR with real-time detections and AI-driven protection, perfect for security-focused firms. In comparison, Morphisec’s lightweight design focuses effectively on in-memory attack prevention, making it ideal for organizations needing minimal end-user impact and cost-effective solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Morphisec Report
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher setup costs due to advanced features, while Morphisec provides a more budget-friendly initial investment with straightforward deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher setup costs due to advanced features, while Morphisec provides a more budget-friendly initial investment with straightforward deployment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate offers robust network and endpoint defense with integrated deception technology, appealing to those needing comprehensive onsite protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced threat detection with a cloud-native architecture, ideal for buyers seeking scalable, agile security solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fidelis Elevate Report
Fidelis Elevate requires a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward, cost-effective startup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate requires a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward, cost-effective startup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers extensive threat intelligence and AI-driven detection for enterprises needing comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, Coro emphasizes simplicity with automated cloud security, appealing to organizations seeking rapid deployment and ease of use, making it suitable for smaller businesses.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost, while Coro provides a more economical setup option, reflecting significant differences in pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost, while Coro provides a more economical setup option, reflecting significant differences in pricing strategy.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon leads in security features, offering advanced threat detection with AI-powered analytics. In comparison, Kandji excels in seamless integration for Apple devices, providing automated management. Tech buyers may choose Falcon for security or Kandji for efficient Apple ecosystem management.
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive security features, while Kandji offers a lower cost, aligning with its streamlined device management focus. The choice hinges on prioritizing advanced security or budget-friendly device management.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive security features, while Kandji offers a lower cost, aligning with its streamlined device management focus. The choice hinges on prioritizing advanced security or budget-friendly device management.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced EDR features and AI-driven threat handling, aiding in seamless investigation without on-site visits. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers cost-effective security with honeypot features and RDP protection, catering to budget-conscious users seeking reliable basics.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, making Sangfor often the more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited initial investment capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, making Sangfor often the more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited initial investment capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced endpoint visibility and remote threat management. In comparison, WatchGuard excels in network traffic filtering and automated responses. Tech buyers may choose CrowdStrike for its comprehensive forensics or WatchGuard for its effective network security at a competitive price.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers straightforward setup costs, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response involves more complex installation fees, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers straightforward setup costs, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response involves more complex installation fees, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides real-time monitoring and cloud-native flexibility. In comparison, Symantec Embedded in malware detection excels in network isolation. CrowdStrike's high price aligns with advanced features, whereas Symantec offers affordability but with higher costs for on-premises setups.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower initial setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which tends to be higher. This cost difference highlights CrowdStrike's competitive pricing advantage.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower initial setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which tends to be higher. This cost difference highlights CrowdStrike's competitive pricing advantage.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection, making it ideal for those seeking robust security analytics with quick deployment. In comparison, Halcyon's advanced automation and adaptive learning appeal to buyers looking for proactive threat mitigation with innovative features.
CrowdStrike Falcon has minimal setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Halcyon requires a more complex setup process that may involve additional expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has minimal setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Halcyon requires a more complex setup process that may involve additional expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its AI-driven threat detection, offering seamless cloud-based deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR attracts buyers with its comprehensive endpoint coverage, requiring a detailed setup but offering competitive pricing balanced with strong security features tailored to protective needs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it a more budget-friendly option upfront. WatchGuard EPDR, however, may offer more robust initial configuration features at a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard EPDR, making it a more budget-friendly option upfront. WatchGuard EPDR, however, may offer more robust initial configuration features at a higher price point.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Heimdal Endpoint Security
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its cost-effectiveness and threat intelligence, attracting buyers needing quick deployment. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security appeals with its advanced ransomware and malware defense, justifying higher costs through its specialized features and DNS filtering capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon requires higher initial setup costs, while Heimdal Endpoint Security offers more budget-friendly implementation, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires higher initial setup costs, while Heimdal Endpoint Security offers more budget-friendly implementation, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced threat hunting and real-time analytics, ideal for comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Uptycs offers detailed auditing for cloud and container security, appealing to those prioritizing specialized cloud monitoring. CrowdStrike's deployment suits diverse environments, whereas Uptycs focuses on cloud infrastructures.
CrowdStrike Falcon requires an initial setup fee, while Uptycs offers a more flexible pricing structure without upfront costs, highlighting a key difference in their approach to initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires an initial setup fee, while Uptycs offers a more flexible pricing structure without upfront costs, highlighting a key difference in their approach to initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
N-able EDR
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
N-able EDR
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced threat intelligence and real-time response, making it ideal for those needing cutting-edge security. In comparison, N-able EDR offers integration simplicity and configuration flexibility, appealing to businesses prioritizing personalization and cost efficiency.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. N-able EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in integration and speed, ideal for organizations prioritizing efficiency and security management. In comparison, WithSecure Elements offers advanced threat intelligence and deep analysis, catering to companies focusing on comprehensive security insights and detailed threat analytics for in-depth protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a more straightforward setup process, while WithSecure Elements boasts cost-effective deployment. CrowdStrike's setup features advanced customization, whereas WithSecure Elements prioritizes simplicity in deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a more straightforward setup process, while WithSecure Elements boasts cost-effective deployment. CrowdStrike's setup features advanced customization, whereas WithSecure Elements prioritizes simplicity in deployment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Absolute Secure Endpoint
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence with real-time monitoring and strong AI capabilities, appealing to those needing rapid, cloud-based solutions. In comparison, Absolute Secure Endpoint excels in asset management, self-healing capabilities, and cost-effectiveness for comprehensive, device-centric security environments.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Absolute Secure Endpoint requires a more complex installation process that may incur higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Absolute Secure Endpoint requires a more complex installation process that may incur higher setup expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its advanced threat intelligence and real-time response capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers a broad feature set and cost-effective solutions, appealing to those seeking maximum value and comprehensive security over time.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves more complex initial configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR involves more complex initial configurations.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Virsec Security Platform
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat intelligence and real-time monitoring, appealing with lower costs and quick deployment. In comparison, Virsec Security Platform's strong application protection and custom support suit complex setups, justifying higher investment for comprehensive security.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a complex setup process, while Virsec Security Platform offers a simpler installation. Users note the difference in initial configuration ease between the two, impacting the deployment time for each product.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a complex setup process, while Virsec Security Platform offers a simpler installation. Users note the difference in initial configuration ease between the two, impacting the deployment time for each product.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)