Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo

Top 10 CrowdStrike Falcon Alternatives

Vendor: CrowdStrike
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
4,511 followers
Post review

Top CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CrowdStrike Falcon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiEDR, and Cisco Secure Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

CrowdStrike Falcon surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, real-time endpoint protection, and cloud-native architecture, which ensure rapid detection and response capabilities. Its lightweight agent minimizes impact on system performance, providing superior security without compromising efficiency.

CrowdStrike Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CrowdStrike, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and threat analysis with minimal system impact and cloud flexibility. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers AI-driven protection with seamless Microsoft integration. CrowdStrike may suit diverse systems, while Defender integrates well within Microsoft environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is higher compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with AI-powered threat detection and EDR features, ideal for security-focused buyers seeking advanced threat analysis. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers affordability and strong integration within Fortinet's ecosystem, appealing to buyers prioritizing cost-effectiveness and seamless integration.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers minimal setup costs, prioritizing ease of implementation, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents more upfront investment, reflecting its comprehensive deployment needs. This highlights Falcon's cost-efficiency and FortiEDR's focus on robust, in-depth protection.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers minimal setup costs, prioritizing ease of implementation, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents more upfront investment, reflecting its comprehensive deployment needs. This highlights Falcon's cost-efficiency and FortiEDR's focus on robust, in-depth protection.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and threat detection with AI-driven insights, appealing to those valuing minimal system impact. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers robust malware protection and better integration with Cisco's ecosystem, ideal for businesses needing comprehensive security across platforms.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint typically presents a more structured cost approach.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint typically presents a more structured cost approach.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers AI-driven threat detection and a unique rollback capability against ransomware, appealing to tech buyers seeking strong EDR features. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon emphasizes threat intelligence, attracting those needing robust detection and comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while CrowdStrike Falcon provides a more extensive initial setup, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while CrowdStrike Falcon provides a more extensive initial setup, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time threat analysis and offers scalable security with comprehensive visibility. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR provides seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems, featuring AI-driven threat detection. Each solution caters to different security environments, offering distinct advantages and integrations for diverse needs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon generally involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, highlighting a difference in initial financial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon generally involves higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, highlighting a difference in initial financial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in customization and integration with various data sources. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon outshines with advanced threat detection capabilities. QRadar's log management and correlation abilities stand out, while Falcon is praised for real-time monitoring and quick threat response.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar's setup cost is relatively high, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar's setup cost is relatively high, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective alternative.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides real-time monitoring, AI-driven detection, and robust threat protection, appealing to those needing advanced response capabilities. In comparison, Elastic Security offers customizable security monitoring through Elastic Stack integration, ideal for buyers focused on search, analytics, and budget-friendly solutions.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Elastic Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher, offering advanced features and robust security, while Elastic Security is more budget-friendly with scalable options.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher, offering advanced features and robust security, while Elastic Security is more budget-friendly with scalable options.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and real-time response. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint offers ML-driven threat detection and ransomware protection. CrowdStrike favors integration ease, while Intercept X emphasizes machine learning insights and server protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup, while Intercept X Endpoint requires more involved initial deployment. CrowdStrike offers a quicker start with less complexity compared to the detailed configuration demands of Intercept X.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup, while Intercept X Endpoint requires more involved initial deployment. CrowdStrike offers a quicker start with less complexity compared to the detailed configuration demands of Intercept X.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ideal for seamless integration and platform support, offering extensive threat protection. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon is suited for real-time threat intelligence with powerful detection. Trend Vision emphasizes flexible deployment, while CrowdStrike offers substantial security value but higher costs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a straightforward setup, while CrowdStrike Falcon can be complex and costly to initiate due to its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security involves a straightforward setup, while CrowdStrike Falcon can be complex and costly to initiate due to its advanced features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
Lookout excels in mobile threat protection, making it ideal for securing mobile devices. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced endpoint detection and response, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive endpoint security. Lookout's competitive pricing attracts mobile-focused buyers, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Lookout Report
Lookout offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, catering to budget-conscious users. Conversely, CrowdStrike Falcon's higher setup cost reflects its advanced features and robust security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, catering to budget-conscious users. Conversely, CrowdStrike Falcon's higher setup cost reflects its advanced features and robust security capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon emphasizes advanced EDR capabilities and AI-driven threat detection with a lightweight agent suited for cloud environments. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers comprehensive antivirus features with centralized management, ideal for on-premises deployments seeking device and network control.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a relatively low setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a relatively low setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium is ideal for organizations needing robust IT operations with real-time endpoint management despite complex deployment. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon appeals to security-focused businesses with advanced cloud-based features and faster threat detection, offering easier deployment and streamlined support, albeit at potentially higher prices.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a high setup cost which may be prohibitive for some, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable setup option. Despite the pricing differences, both solutions provide distinct advantages in cybersecurity.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a high setup cost which may be prohibitive for some, while CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more affordable setup option. Despite the pricing differences, both solutions provide distinct advantages in cybersecurity.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive security with features like Threat Emulation and Anti-Ransomware, integrated with firewalls. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR and AI-driven threat detection, with a focus on real-time analysis and cloud deployment for ease of use.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally incurs lower setup costs than CrowdStrike Falcon, while the latter is praised for its comprehensive features that justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint generally incurs lower setup costs than CrowdStrike Falcon, while the latter is praised for its comprehensive features that justify its higher initial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon's cloud-native structure ensures seamless integration and real-time updates, reducing manual management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in process monitoring and kill chain details, appealing to those needing comprehensive threat visualization. Both offer competitive features suited to specific organizational needs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint generally offers lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves a higher setup cost, offering advanced features, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint generally offers lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious users.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint protection with real-time threat detection and minimal system impact. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers extended detection encompassing various platforms and provides centralized security. Tech buyers might choose Falcon for endpoint focus or Vision One for broader coverage.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Vision One Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Vision One, which can lead to quicker integration. Trend Vision One, although slightly more expensive, offers advanced security features, distinguishing it from CrowdStrike Falcon's basic setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Vision One, which can lead to quicker integration. Trend Vision One, although slightly more expensive, offers advanced security features, distinguishing it from CrowdStrike Falcon's basic setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence and real-time detection suitable for various infrastructures. In comparison, HP Wolf Security excels in hardware-enforced isolation technology, appealing to those investing in heightened defense. CrowdStrike Falcon provides flexible pricing, while HP Wolf Security justifies its premium with innovative security.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. HP Wolf Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's moderate setup cost contrasts with HP Wolf Security's higher initial investment, highlighting their differing pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's moderate setup cost contrasts with HP Wolf Security's higher initial investment, highlighting their differing pricing strategies.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive cloud-based security features with high return on investment, appealing to businesses seeking customization despite premium pricing. In comparison, Trellix ENS attracts diverse enterprises with competitive pricing, though it may lack advanced features seen in CrowdStrike.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward and quick setup process minimizing the initial cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) may require a more complex setup leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward and quick setup process minimizing the initial cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) may require a more complex setup leading to potentially higher setup expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in EDR with advanced threat detection, integration, and minimal system impact, appealing to those needing proactive threat monitoring. In comparison, Cynet offers an all-in-one integrated platform with user behavior analysis and deception capabilities, ideal for cost-sensitive buyers preferring bundled features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cynet Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a seamless setup process with minimal cost implications, while Cynet presents a more budget-friendly setup, reflecting different priorities in initial financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a seamless setup process with minimal cost implications, while Cynet presents a more budget-friendly setup, reflecting different priorities in initial financial investment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive visibility and advanced threat detection, justifying its higher cost with potential security benefits. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR provides 24/7 SOC monitoring at competitive pricing, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses seeking efficient threat hunting.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs compared to Huntress Managed EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon incurs higher setup costs compared to Huntress Managed EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers strong real-time threat detection and cloud-native flexibility, focusing on lightweight architecture and robust protection. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR's user-friendly dashboards and automated threat intelligence appeal to those prioritizing endpoint-based pricing and seamless integration with user behavior analytics.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher than Rapid7 InsightIDR, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly option. The difference in pricing may reflect variations in features and deployment complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is typically higher than Rapid7 InsightIDR, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly option. The difference in pricing may reflect variations in features and deployment complexity.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in remote connectivity and threat analysis, appealing to enterprises needing advanced security. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR integrates well with various systems, offering cost-effective, multi-layered protection, suitable for budget-conscious organizations seeking comprehensive threat management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost can be higher but includes seamless integration, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup with straightforward deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost can be higher but includes seamless integration, while Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup with straightforward deployment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5
Cybereason excels in adaptive threat detection and affordability, offering robust antivirus capabilities and flexible pricing. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon stands out for efficient kill chain analysis and threat intelligence, providing higher value with its extensive feature set and lightweight agent performance.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response typically has a higher setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon often offers lower initial expenses, highlighting their cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response typically has a higher setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon often offers lower initial expenses, highlighting their cost difference.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers economical pricing and strong customer support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced threat intelligence and extensive threat-hunting features, suiting those prioritizing comprehensive security coverage despite a higher cost.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a straightforward initial setup process, while CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive configuration flexibility. CrowdStrike Falcon's setup can be more complex compared to Panda Adaptive Defense 360, which is designed for quick deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a straightforward initial setup process, while CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive configuration flexibility. CrowdStrike Falcon's setup can be more complex compared to Panda Adaptive Defense 360, which is designed for quick deployment.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian excels in data protection with tailored security features, ideal for compliance and safeguarding sensitive information. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced endpoint threat detection and response, offering superior threat detection capabilities for organizations prioritizing comprehensive endpoint security despite higher costs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Digital Guardian Report
Digital Guardian's setup cost is significantly higher compared to CrowdStrike Falcon. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective setup, making it an attractive option for organizations mindful of initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian's setup cost is significantly higher compared to CrowdStrike Falcon. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more cost-effective setup, making it an attractive option for organizations mindful of initial expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere integrates multiple security capabilities into one dashboard, ideal for small teams seeking comprehensive solutions. In comparison, Falcon excels in proactive threat detection with minimal system impact, making it suitable for those requiring precise, advanced endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more cost-effective implementation. CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup expenses highlight a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more cost-effective implementation. CrowdStrike Falcon's lower setup expenses highlight a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection with AI analytics, excelling in cybersecurity capabilities. In comparison, Datto EDR focuses on ease of use, providing swift deployment and integration, making it suitable for budget-conscious businesses seeking straightforward endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides real-time threat response and cloud-native capabilities suitable for distributed workforces. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers rollback functionality and flexibility, especially in environments with diverse OS requirements, appealing to businesses focusing on malware detection and simpler user interaction.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client, offering advanced threat protection, while SonicWall is more budget-friendly with a simpler setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client, offering advanced threat protection, while SonicWall is more budget-friendly with a simpler setup process.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Code42 Incydr
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Code42 Incydr
4.5 out of 5
Code42 Incydr's data security and monitoring focus suits organizations managing insider threats. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's broader threat detection capabilities attract those needing extensive security coverage. Code42's simplicity appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while CrowdStrike's comprehensive features justify its higher price.
Download Code42 Incydr vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
Code42 Incydr has a minimal setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial investment. This difference highlights Code42 Incydr's appeal for budget-conscious users compared to its competitor.
View comparison
Pricing
Code42 Incydr has a minimal setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial investment. This difference highlights Code42 Incydr's appeal for budget-conscious users compared to its competitor.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced EDR capabilities, proactive threat hunting, and flexible deployment options. In comparison, NetWitness NDR emphasizes comprehensive network visibility and flexible pricing for large deployments. Both solutions meet different security needs and environments, appealing to diverse tech buyers.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. NetWitness NDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while NetWitness NDR involves a more complex installation process with higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while NetWitness NDR involves a more complex installation process with higher upfront expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust threat detection and valuable threat intelligence, appealing to enterprises seeking advanced security. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR attracts businesses desiring integrated security with flexible deployment through its extensive data integration, making it suitable for those needing unified solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a significant variance between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a significant variance between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers real-time threat intelligence and advanced breach prevention for comprehensive security. In comparison, Open EDR provides customizable, open-source endpoint detection for flexibility. CrowdStrike appeals to those prioritizing security, while Open EDR attracts budget-conscious buyers seeking scalable solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while Open EDR offers a more affordable initial expense, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while Open EDR offers a more affordable initial expense, highlighting a key pricing difference.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels with its integrated threat detection and response tools, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive network security. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced endpoint protection with AI-driven analytics, appealing to those prioritizing scalable cloud solutions and enhanced endpoint features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fidelis Elevate Report
Fidelis Elevate requires a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward, cost-effective startup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate requires a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which offers a more straightforward, cost-effective startup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced endpoint detection and response capabilities with real-time analysis, ideal for organizations needing deep visibility. In comparison, Morphisec offers a signatureless memory protection approach with minimal configuration, appealing to those desiring efficient threat prevention at a lower cost.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Morphisec Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial investment, while Morphisec offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher initial investment, while Morphisec offers a more cost-effective setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence, efficient setup, and minimal performance impact. In comparison, Trellix EDR integrates antivirus and detection features with strong investigative tools. CrowdStrike's cost may deter small businesses, while Trellix provides flexible pricing suitable for cost-sensitive buyers.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking efficient endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking efficient endpoint protection.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with its advanced threat intelligence and cloud-native architecture, catering to users valuing cutting-edge features. In comparison, ESET Inspect appeals to cost-conscious buyers, offering detailed analytics and flexible deployment, maximizing ROI with lower initial costs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Inspect Report
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost structure, providing clear budgeting, while ESET Inspect offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying financial needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost structure, providing clear budgeting, while ESET Inspect offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying financial needs.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust real-time threat response and cloud-native flexibility. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR excels with strong signature-based malware detection and centralized management. CrowdStrike appeals to large enterprises, while Kaspersky is suitable for cost-sensitive on-premise setups.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Report
The setup cost for CrowdStrike Falcon is higher compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for CrowdStrike Falcon is higher compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat analytics and visibility for remote manual analysis. In comparison, WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response provides ease of use and affordability, making it ideal for smaller environments with automated alerts and network filtering.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon involves a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced cybersecurity, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing ease of integration and use.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon involves a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced cybersecurity, while WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing ease of integration and use.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and AI-driven threat analysis, offering advanced tools for remote access and investigation. In comparison, Symantec EDR is more cost-effective, providing solid malware detection and minimal impact on network resources, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup process with competitive pricing, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup process with competitive pricing, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Kandji
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in comprehensive endpoint protection with advanced threat intelligence. In comparison, Kandji offers rich device management features optimized for Apple, appealing to organizations focused on macOS and iOS, while Falcon attracts those seeking robust, cloud-native security across diverse environments.
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more flexible setup cost, while Kandji's setup cost is straightforward.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more flexible setup cost, while Kandji's setup cost is straightforward.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its advanced threat intelligence and proactive threat management, appealing to those needing robust security. In comparison, Coro attracts with its comprehensive feature set and ease of use, ideal for buyers seeking cost-efficient, all-in-one cybersecurity solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs a higher upfront setup cost compared to Coro, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. Consideration of these costs is crucial when evaluating these cybersecurity solutions for your organization.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically incurs a higher upfront setup cost compared to Coro, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. Consideration of these costs is crucial when evaluating these cybersecurity solutions for your organization.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with comprehensive EDR features and advanced threat analysis suitable for businesses seeking robust cybersecurity. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers basic protection for budget-conscious buyers, making it an appealing choice for small to medium-sized businesses focusing on affordability.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves higher setup costs compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves higher setup costs compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced threat intelligence and seamless cloud deployment, appealing to those prioritizing robust endpoint protection. In comparison, Uptycs offers comprehensive visibility and versatile deployment, ideal for organizations seeking in-depth monitoring across diverse infrastructures.
CrowdStrike Falcon setup cost is higher but offers robust security features, while Uptycs provides a more affordable setup with competitive analytics capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon setup cost is higher but offers robust security features, while Uptycs provides a more affordable setup with competitive analytics capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Halcyon
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in pricing and support with efficient threat detection, attracting cost-sensitive buyers. In comparison, Halcyon, known for expansive features and comprehensive protection, appeals to those prioritizing robust offerings over cost, despite a more complex initial setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost with detailed implementation, whereas Halcyon offers a more straightforward setup process at a lower cost.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost with detailed implementation, whereas Halcyon offers a more straightforward setup process at a lower cost.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection with its AI-driven intelligence, appealing to those needing rapid cloud integration. In comparison, N-able EDR attracts users requiring customizable security policies and robust incident response capabilities, with cost-efficient pricing and strong IT infrastructure compatibility.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. N-able EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Heimdal Endpoint Security
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its real-time threat intelligence and ease of deployment, appealing to organizations seeking rapid implementation. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security's proactive threat prevention and flexible deployment options attract businesses needing comprehensive protection with budget-conscious pricing.
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher compared to Heimdal Endpoint Security, which offers more affordable pricing options for initial implementation. This cost distinction highlights key differences in the budget considerations for each software solution.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs are generally higher compared to Heimdal Endpoint Security, which offers more affordable pricing options for initial implementation. This cost distinction highlights key differences in the budget considerations for each software solution.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers superior threat intelligence and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking advanced protection. In comparison, WithSecure Elements provides flexible integration and automation, ideal for diverse environments. CrowdStrike's strength lies in intelligence, whereas WithSecure excels in adaptability and ease of use.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more costly initial setup compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, which provides a more budget-friendly installation. This reflects differences in pricing approaches between these endpoint detection solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a more costly initial setup compared to WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, which provides a more budget-friendly installation. This reflects differences in pricing approaches between these endpoint detection solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon's strengths lie in real-time threat intelligence and easy integration. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR offers comprehensive protection with user behavioral analytics. Falcon suits those needing quick deployment, while EPDR appeals to budget-conscious tech buyers with flexible pricing and complete security features.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more affordable in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon requires a higher setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more affordable in initial expenses.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.0 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced threat intelligence and real-time detection, appealing to those seeking high ROI despite higher costs. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR offers integrated risk analytics and flexible deployment, providing comprehensive protection with cost-effective pricing and robust customer support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, making Bitdefender a more budget-friendly option. Falcon's advanced features and market presence justify its pricing, though Bitdefender remains a strong contender with competitive costs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost than Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, making Bitdefender a more budget-friendly option. Falcon's advanced features and market presence justify its pricing, though Bitdefender remains a strong contender with competitive costs.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Absolute Secure Endpoint
1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon attracts tech buyers with innovative threat response and agility, excelling in threat detection and visibility. In comparison, Absolute Secure Endpoint appeals with embedded persistence and device-focused security, offering robust asset management and self-healing, balancing cost-effectiveness with strategic security investments.
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its straightforward setup and transparent pricing, while Absolute Secure Endpoint is often noted for its higher initial setup costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its straightforward setup and transparent pricing, while Absolute Secure Endpoint is often noted for its higher initial setup costs and complexity.
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Logo
Virsec Security Platform
3.5 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in cost-effectiveness and support with advanced endpoint protection. In comparison, Virsec Security Platform impresses with deep application security and runtime protection, offering extensive features that may justify higher investment for comprehensive security.
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher setup costs compared to Virsec Security Platform, which is noted for its affordability in initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon often incurs higher setup costs compared to Virsec Security Platform, which is noted for its affordability in initial deployment.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)