CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response comparison

CrowdStrike and Cybereason are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while Cybereason is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.2. CrowdStrike holds a 16.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Cybereason’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 126 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

30,794 Views
22,906 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,074 Views
1,727 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Cybereason and CrowdStrike Falcon are two leading solutions in endpoint security. CrowdStrike Falcon has the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall performance, offering significant ROI despite its higher cost.

Features: Cybereason is recognized for strong threat detection and response capabilities, robust feature set, and effective endpoint visibility. CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced AI-driven analytics, comprehensive threat intelligence, and superior endpoint protection.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason could improve its integration with third-party tools, enhance incident reporting, and expand mobile threat detection. CrowdStrike Falcon users see room for better mobile threat detection, improved offline capabilities, and more granular reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason offers a smooth deployment process and responsive customer service. CrowdStrike Falcon impresses with streamlined cloud-based deployment and a proactive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason's pricing structure is considered reasonable, showing favorable ROI with reduced incident response times. CrowdStrike Falcon, despite being higher in cost, justifies the price with advanced features and a significant ROI through comprehensive threat management.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,319 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 16.6%, up from 14.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers great stability."

"The machine learning behavior for anomaly detection is a valuable feature. It helps identify any suspicious or unusual activities within the system."

"The CS falcon agent is a lightweight agent compared with other agents of EDR products."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint."

"It provides very good protection and the ability to crosscheck environments."

"Cyberattack detection is very good. We use it for detecting different vulnerabilities, such as ransomware, virus, and malware. It is a good product today when compared to Symantec that we used previously."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The stability is very good."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

Cons

"For CrowdStrike to work, all the machines need to have an internet connection. This makes it challenging to assist customers without an internet connection. We would like to have a mechanism or relay to make this possible."

"CrowdStrike needs to quit making up stuff about its features and functionality to bash its competition."

"Too many false positives."

"One thing that is not yet available is attack simulation."

"We can't do scanning audits or device blocking or application control."

"The solution should have included remote wipe capability out of the box."

"We would like to be able to perform on-demand scanning, rather than relying on the scheduler."

"Deployment in cloud environments is challenging. Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."

"We are on an annual subscription for the solution. There are not any additional costs."

"With respect to pricing, my suggestion to others is to evaluate the environment and purchase what you need."

"The more endpoints an organization adds the cheaper the cost."

"The price of CrowdStrike Falcon could be better. It is very expensive, we pay approximately $900 per month for the licenses. There are not any additional fees."

"We pay 40,000 dirhams per 100 users."

"The cost of CrowdStrike Falcon could be reduced. It is quite expensive if you compare it to other solutions, such as Blue Coat, Symantec, McAfee, or Kaspersky."

"Annual licensing."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"The pricing is manageable."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

March 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

March 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

February 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.