CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response comparison

CrowdStrike and Cybereason are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Cybereason is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.3. CrowdStrike holds a 16.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Cybereason’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 123 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

31,568 Views
23,483 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,339 Views
1,863 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Cybereason and CrowdStrike Falcon are two leading solutions in endpoint security. CrowdStrike Falcon has the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall performance, offering significant ROI despite its higher cost.

Features: Cybereason is recognized for strong threat detection and response capabilities, robust feature set, and effective endpoint visibility. CrowdStrike Falcon excels with advanced AI-driven analytics, comprehensive threat intelligence, and superior endpoint protection.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason could improve its integration with third-party tools, enhance incident reporting, and expand mobile threat detection. CrowdStrike Falcon users see room for better mobile threat detection, improved offline capabilities, and more granular reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason offers a smooth deployment process and responsive customer service. CrowdStrike Falcon impresses with streamlined cloud-based deployment and a proactive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason's pricing structure is considered reasonable, showing favorable ROI with reduced incident response times. CrowdStrike Falcon, despite being higher in cost, justifies the price with advanced features and a significant ROI through comprehensive threat management.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

3rd

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

41st

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 16.8%, up from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There's almost no maintenance required. It's very low if there's any at all."

"It's ability to do threat hunting is really great, quite robust, and even allows you to do hygiene stuff."

"The detection is very effective."

"The most valuable features are the complete IPS and IDS."

"It's really good because it can detect anything."

"The detection is very reliable. Also, OverWatch is a great feature."

"I like the Overwatch feature the most."

"The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"The solution is efficient."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

Cons

"Unfortunately, native applications are not supported."

"There are some areas where some customers would prefer a different service."

"We sometimes get false positives."

"We encounter occasional issues, such as when disabling network access for a host that uses CrowdStrike."

"The dashboard area must be improved. We have integration with Splunk, and we are creating a dashboard there. Their dashboard area must be up to date. It should have more details and more options to create the reports and things like that."

"The performance could be better."

"I would also like to see the endpoint firewall component produce some level of logging and feedback."

"The current database schema presents challenges and has potential for improvement."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"They need to improve their technical support services."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"I would like to see improvements on the operational side, specifically in grouping."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is usually a challenge in the industry. I think we pay around sixty-eight dollars."

"Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace is just a click away. Since we were using the on-premise version of the product, we continued on the cloud by purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace."

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing on CrowdStrike is per license. It was about $42 per seat yearly."

"The solution isn't very costly; it's affordable."

"The price is too high."

"I do not have experience with the cost or licensing of the product."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. I don't think we are getting charged more than what it is worth. It is fair, but I do not like how it is a la carte. I realize they do that so other organizations can buy and get the agent, getting it cheaper than you could otherwise. However, if you want the main core package, which has all the main features with the exception of maybe the multi-cloud protections, that can get pricier for an organization. So, you have to pick and choose what you want. I do not care for a la carte pricing."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"The pricing is manageable."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

February 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

February 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

January 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.