Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Tanium comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 16 Tanium reviews

6,211 Views
4,378 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Tanium and Cybereason compete in the Endpoint Detection & Response category. Cybereason has a slight upper hand due to its advanced threat detection and user-friendly deployment process.

Features: Tanium offers real-time data processing, comprehensive endpoint visibility, and intricate control capabilities. Cybereason provides automated threat hunting, AI-driven analytics, and advanced threat detection. Both platforms deliver robust features, but Cybereason's AI capabilities give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Tanium needs a simpler setup process, an enhanced dashboard, and better reporting tools. Cybereason could benefit from improved reporting tools, reduced system resource usage, and further optimization of its analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tanium's deployment process is complex but supported by strong customer service. Cybereason offers a straightforward deployment process with reliable customer service, providing an advantage in ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium is considered expensive, with users questioning its ROI despite its capabilities. Cybereason, while also pricey, is generally viewed as providing better value for its cost, offering a more favorable pricing-to-benefit ratio.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Tanium Report (Updated: February 2025).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Tanium

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tanium

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

37th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

26th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (10th), Vulnerability Management (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Mo Vermeiren

Cybersecurity Business & Technology Consultant at Capgemini

Is able to make several campaigns work in parallel, but the user interface needs improvement

It's mainly used by the cybersecurity team for Windows patching and deployment of some software solutions I like the fact that you can create patching campaigns depending on the area of your network that you want to address first. I like the ability it has to make several campaigns that work in…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"The solution is efficient."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."

"I like the tool's incident response and security patching."

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."

"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."

"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."

"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"They need to improve their technical support services."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"The performance could improve in future releases. We have had performance issues in specialized web environments, but overall I think the problems are less than 2% of the computer systems being used."

"The solution lacks mobility."

"The main issues are the network connection because different customers have issues with their networks. It's difficult implementing this type of solution because the network is the main feature in the architecture for these types of solutions. Tanium could improve by creating some network optimization."

"Tanium’s scalability could be improved."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium."

"The most painful thing is the interface. It's a bit unclear sometimes."

"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"The pricing is manageable."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"The solution offers value for money."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Tanium?

Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable.

What needs improvement with Tanium?

When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, creat...

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

We primarily use Tanium for patching, focusing on vulnerabilities. Our major goal with Tanium is to patch based on vulnerabilities detected by our other vulnerability tools.

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

March 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Download Tanium product report

March 2025

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life