CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

CrowdStrike and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while WatchGuard is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.9. CrowdStrike holds a 11.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 126 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

27,775 Views
20,397 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Read 28 Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reviews

3,241 Views
2,715 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and CrowdStrike Falcon compete in the endpoint protection solutions category. CrowdStrike Falcon appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive threat intelligence capabilities and advanced security features, despite its higher cost.

Features: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is valued for its automatic and continuous monitoring capabilities. Users highlight its proactive threat detection and ease of integrating additional security modules. CrowdStrike Falcon stands out with its comprehensive threat intelligence, real-time monitoring, and seamless cloud-based management. Users of CrowdStrike Falcon highly appreciate the detailed reporting and quick threat resolution.

Room for Improvement: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 users suggest improvements in reporting features, enhanced support for macOS environments, and more advanced configuration options. CrowdStrike Falcon users indicate a need for advanced configuration options, better offline protection measures, and faster support response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers a straightforward deployment process with dedicated customer support. CrowdStrike Falcon provides an easy deployment experience, but some users mention that the support response time could be improved. Both products have strong customer service, although CrowdStrike’s support could be more swift.

Pricing and ROI:Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is seen as cost-effective with a reasonable ROI due to its comprehensive protection at a lower price point. CrowdStrike Falcon, despite being expensive, is deemed worth the investment because of its advanced feature set and higher-end security capabilities that justify its price for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

30th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 11.2%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition."

"The detection and response console is the most valuable feature."

"All the features are beneficial."

"I like the feature called RTC, the remote time connector."

"Regarding features, I appreciate its integration capabilities with identity providers...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The DLP is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."

"The endpoint and server management are the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon."

"I like the Overwatch feature the most."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"It offers an easy initial setup."

"I would give the overall solution a rating of ten out of ten."

"Great technical support staff."

"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"I've found it's got excellent web protection."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"The interface is great."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros

Cons

"It would be nice if they did have some sort of Active Directory tie-in, whether that be Azure or on-prem. Sometimes, it is difficult for us to determine if we are missing any endpoints or servers in CrowdStrike. We honestly don't have a great inventory, but it would be nice if CrowdStrike had a way to say this is everything in your environment, Active Directory-wise, and this is what doesn't have sensors. They try to do that now with a function that they have built-in, but I have been unsuccessful in having it help us identify what needs a sensor. So, better visibility of what doesn't have a sensor in our environment would be helpful."

"CrowdStrike costs a little more than its competitors."

"There are some aspects of the UI that could use some improvement, e.g., working in groups. I build a group, then I have to manually assign prevention policies, update policies, etc., but there is no function to copy that group. So, if I wanted to make a subgroup for troubleshooting or divide workstations into groups of laptops and desktops, then I have to manually build a brand new group. I can't just copy a build from one to another. Additionally, in order to do any work within a group, I have to first do the work on the respective prevention policy page or individual policy page, then remove the group if the group is assigned to a different prevention policy, remove the prevention policy, and then add the new one in. So, it can get a little hectic. It would be easier if I could add and remove things from the group page rather than having to go into the policy pages to do it."

"It would be nice if the dashboard had some more information upfront, and looked a little better."

"CS Falcon sensing capabilities for non-domain machines should be enhanced since the agent doesn't detect the neighbor's IP Address and/or any anomaly which was identified in the network for the non-domain machine."

"It does take more time to scan than other solutions."

"Dashboard creation is one of the areas for improvement in CrowdStrike Falcon. Sometimes, management asks for a custom dashboard, so my team has to collect data from CrowdStrike Falcon, integrate that in Splunk, then create the dashboard in Splunk. The Splunk dashboard is more elaborate, so the CrowdStrike Falcon dashboard needs improvement. Another area for improvement in the tool is the malware detection report, as it needs to be more detailed and include some graphics so that if you want to present that data in a nutshell, it's easier to do. For example, the report should consist of some graphical representation that shows a month's worth of data. In terms of an additional feature I'd like CrowdStrike Falcon to have, it's the device posture assessment feature that detects the device posture within the network. Whichever device connects to the corporate network, my company should be able to analyze the device posture. Then there should be communication with the network, which means that as soon as a device connects, CrowdStrike Falcon can assess the device posture, detect its corporate asset, and decide whether it should be allowed on the network."

"The ability to receive text alerts natively in the console would be kind of cool."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"Occasionally, we suffer from little bugs that give us the wrong message."

"The Linux installation is performed on the command line and they need a package installer for that operating system."

"Their MacOS support isn't that good."

"Needs a better way to scan the hardware to detect whether it's valid."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"In my opinion, the pricing of CrowdStrike Falcon seems aggressive."

"We bought a very small number of licenses, then ran it for a year. We bought a 100 licenses for a year, so we didn't actually do a proof of concept. We just bought them. Then, the next year, we bought 10,000 licenses."

"The licensing model is straightforward. We choose the features we want and we then can download the package we want."

"The price is fixed with no room for negotiation."

"It's an expensive solution but you get a very good product for the price. Compared to other products, SentinelOne is definitely cheaper and the Microsoft E5 package is probably more expensive. Not many companies are willing to purchase CrowdStrike Falcon in Turkey due to the cost, but the market is changing."

"This solution has a very competitive price."

"We have a yearly subscription and find the price to be good. I'd give it a rating of four out of five for price, we got a good discount."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

Although it is not a cheap solution, it is satisfying and functional. It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 25% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 6% of the time

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

March 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

March 2025

Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

February 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.