Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360’s support receives mixed reviews, praised for skill but criticized for delays and access challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 needs integration and usability improvements, addressing false positives, compatibility, stability, and detailed reporting issues.
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ideal for SMBs with scalable cloud management, though large enterprises may face configuration challenges.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers cloud-only, subscription-based pricing per device, generally priced moderately around €20-€30 annually.
I would rate the pricing as six out of ten, and its costs appear to be moderately priced.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is stable, efficient, and reliable, with minor update issues but effective malware detection and performance.
The stability is approximately a seven to eight out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 provides comprehensive security with advanced features, ease of use, scalability, and efficient threat mitigation.
The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is 3.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Kevin Mabry - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides telemetry, risk assessment, and behavior monitoring
I like the risk assessment tool built into Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because I'm really into risk assessments and vulnerability testing. I think that is crucial and needed, and I don't see that often with most EDRs. The telemetry I get from the tool can be used in a SOC I use. The solution has behavior monitoring that allows you to monitor people's specific behaviour and practices. You can then ask the person to stop or start doing something. You can also do application management and access management. You can do many things within Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because it is like a one-stop shop scenario.
Juan Ramón López Ruiz - PeerSpot reviewer
Recognizes and mitigates a wide array of spam and phishing attempts
The solution provides protection, including ransomware and mail protection. It can recognize and mitigate a wide array of spam and phishing attempts. The software is adept at distinguishing legitimate emails from malicious ones, ensuring that users receive genuine communications while being protected. Additionally, it is lightweight and unobtrusive to users, providing adequate protection without impacting system performance. While advancements such as cheaper data processors may enhance its capabilities, maintaining its agility and transparency remains paramount.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Hospitality Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
They need to improve the dashboard by adding a dedicated executive view. This view should provide executives with a clear overview of what's happening. Also, the UI needs to be more user-friendly, ...
What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.
What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The software can improve the number of messages we are receiving in case of an attack.
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Bitdefender GravityZone
Panda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mentor Graphics, Rudersdal Kommune
Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.