

Cortex XDR and WatchGuard EPDR are competitive cybersecurity solutions. Cortex XDR is favored for its comprehensive threat detection capabilities while WatchGuard EPDR stands out due to its integration of endpoint protection and detection response.
Features: Cortex XDR is praised for effective threat correlation across various datasets, enhancing visibility and response actions. It provides powerful analytics for identifying and mitigating threats, and includes advanced machine learning for real-time threat detection. WatchGuard EPDR integrates EDR with traditional antivirus solutions, providing robust endpoint protection. It offers ease of use in day-to-day operations with seamless integration of protection and detection features, and strong compatibility with various operating systems.
Room for Improvement: Users have noted that Cortex XDR could benefit from improved support for older systems, more intuitive setup processes, and enhanced reporting capabilities. WatchGuard EPDR users suggest improvements in the depth of reporting, the addition of more advanced automation features, and more comprehensive threat analysis tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find Cortex XDR deployment straightforward with minimal configuration issues, but support can be inconsistent. WatchGuard EPDR is also easily deployed and receives higher marks for consistent and responsive customer service. WatchGuard’s reliable support aids in smoother deployment experiences and better ongoing operational support.
Pricing and ROI: Cortex XDR users feel the product is priced on the higher end but see significant ROI due to its extensive threat detection capabilities. WatchGuard EPDR is considered more budget-friendly with competitive ROI, appealing to smaller organizations due to its cost-effectiveness. Cortex XDR’s superior threat detection commands a premium whereas WatchGuard’s better affordability wins favor among budget-conscious users.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
I can say that knowing you have a product like WatchGuard EPDR that's working 24/7 to help protect students in a school is good for ROI.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They create a case, tell me to refer to articles, and if not resolved, they take a remote session to solve the issue.
Technical support for Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is provided by the reseller, and they also do preventive maintenance yearly.
The technical support from WatchGuard would rate at about an eight on a scale of 1 to 10, where one is the worst technical support and 10 is the best technical support.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
WatchGuard EPDR is very competitive regarding its scalability.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
It is very stable with no hanging problems.
WatchGuard EPDR is a very stable solution and is not resource intensive.
The stability is approximately a seven to eight out of ten.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement.
Other firewalls allow adding categories and in-app controls which WatchGuard currently lacks.
An area for improvement would be the software deployment to seamlessly deploy software packages across multiple machines simultaneously.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.
The pricing is slightly high, but the product quality justifies it.
Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The cloud of WatchGuard lets me see all my devices, updating me to minute levels with detailed information, such as patch status and vulnerabilities.
The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective.
The EDR has a high accuracy rate with only a few false positives.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| WatchGuard EPDR | 2.1% |
| Other | 94.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks delivers comprehensive endpoint security, integrating well with other systems to offer robust threat detection and real-time protection through AI-driven analytics.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers advanced endpoint protection and threat detection through AI and behavior-based analytics. Its user-friendly design simplifies integration with firewalls, delivering multi-layered protection with low resource consumption. Valued for policy management, USB control, and incident correlation, Cortex XDR enhances threat management and real-time threat hunting capabilities. However, users note challenges with third-party integration, reporting, and dashboard automation. Agent performance across operating systems and memory consumption are areas for improvement, alongside reducing false positives and simplifying endpoint management and setup.
What features does Cortex XDR offer?
What benefits should be considered in reviews?
Cortex XDR is crucial in industries requiring robust endpoint protection, such as finance, healthcare, and technology. It supports malware detection, behavioral analysis, and ransomware mitigation across endpoints, including remote work environments, providing comprehensive threat visibility and security policy management. The solution's integration with firewalls and specialized industry requirements enhances security posture in diverse operational settings.
EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.