Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th)
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (61st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (53rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is designed for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, down 1.5% compared to last year.
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, on the other hand, focuses on Log Management, holds 0.1% mindshare, down 0.1% since last year.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

AtulChaurasia - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2023
Scalable platform with intuitive features for detecting malicious files
We use Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response to scan and detect unusual processes and malicious files on the endpoint The product's threat-hunting feature is very intuitive and easy to use as it is GUI-based. We need to know the specific fields we want to scan. It gives the entire report of…
JT
Jan 7, 2020
Good file integrity monitoring and change tracking tools but the knowledge base needs to be available online
We use this solution primarily for real-time log analytics. We also use the NNT Log Tracker and Change Tracker for the FIM functionality The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable. With that, we analyze the log and differentiate between the planned and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."
"For me, the technical support is good."
"The solution is efficient."
"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The initial setup is not overly complicated."
"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."
"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."
"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."
"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."
"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."
 

Cons

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."
"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."
"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."
"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."
"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."
"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."
"It initially took some time to deploy."
"The product's reporting isn't great."
"The correlation suite needs to be improved."
"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."
"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."
"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
"The pricing is manageable."
"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."
"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."
"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."
"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Wonga, WHSmith
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.