Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Trellix ESM comparison

The compared Cybereason and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Cybereason is ranked #34 in EDR , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 1.3% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #22 in SIEM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Read 20 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews
  • 3,655 Views
  • 2,033 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Trellix ESM
Read 36 Trellix ESM reviews
  • 3,011 Views
  • 1,160 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Trellix ESM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,763 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th)
Trellix ESM
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is designed for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, down 1.5% compared to last year.
Trellix ESM, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 0.8% mindshare, down 1.2% since last year.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

AtulChaurasia - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2023
Scalable platform with intuitive features for detecting malicious files
We use Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response to scan and detect unusual processes and malicious files on the endpoint The product's threat-hunting feature is very intuitive and easy to use as it is GUI-based. We need to know the specific fields we want to scan. It gives the entire report of…
Read full review
Daniel Durian - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 19, 2024
Helps to monitor and detect cyberattacks
I use Trellix ESM to monitor inbound communication from known threat hosts and detect cyberattacks. It's also useful for outbound communication, but we block threat communication via a firewall The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."
"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."
"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."
"The initial setup process is straightforward."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros
"It has good technical support, which is available around the clock. You can call up anytime and get whatever you want. My queues are resolved."
"The most valuable feature is the correlation rules."
"It is easy to use."
"Trellix ESM is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to correlate different events from different platforms that we feed into it."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."
"The solution's technical support is great."
"The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick."
More Trellix ESM pros
 

Cons

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."
"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."
"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."
"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."
"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."
"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."
"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."
"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons
"The initial setup is difficult and could improve."
"It seems McAfee does test its product before releasing. When we - not only us, other companies also - deploy McAfee, we face multiple issues from the customer side, after which, McAfee reacts and fixes the bugs."
"There's no software support from McAfee."
"Product-wise, adding accounts on a single data source by batch would be a really great help."
"The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases."
"The product’s alert response feature needs improvement. It could be more flexible and secure."
"The disk space needed for events is not clear. In all clients, we had at least more than 100GB free that we could not use."
"The solution needs to improve case management. The UI is confusing."
More Trellix ESM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."
"The pricing is manageable."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice
"The pricing is fair."
"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."
"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."
"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."
"We renew our license annually."
"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."
"The product is slightly expensive."
"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."
More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
74%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Government
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.
See all answers
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The interface is user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee ESM?
The solution's technical support is great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?
Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?
The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 26% of the time
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 23% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 7% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 6% of the time
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM
Compared 25% of the time
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Trellix ESM Logo
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Trellix ESM
Compared 19% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM
Compared 17% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM
Compared 12% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Trellix ESM
Compared 9% of the time
More Trellix ESM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
November 2024
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reportDownload Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix ESM
October 2024
Trellix ESM reportDownload Trellix ESM product report
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
 

Learn More

Video not available
Cybereason
Video not available
Trellix
 

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.