Cynet and One Identity Safeguard both compete in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on threat detection and secure access management respectively. Cynet appears to have the upper hand with its cost-effective solutions and broad deployment capabilities, whereas One Identity Safeguard excels in detailed auditing features but at a higher cost, primarily for on-premise solutions.
Features: Cynet offers advanced threat detection, user behavior analysis, and automated remediation, with capabilities extended across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Users benefit from easy deployment on various devices and extensive monitoring features. One Identity Safeguard provides secure access management with real-time audits and transparent session management, focusing on infrastructure compatibility primarily for on-premise applications and supporting detailed compliance.
Room for Improvement: Cynet users have requested enhancements in mobile support, integration, and user-friendliness for handling new threats. Improvements in reporting are also desired. Safeguard users seek better session management, lower costs, and improved integration with current systems. Enhanced session logging and more intuitive management consoles are also areas for growth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet offers flexible deployment across various cloud environments, catering to diverse needs, though its customer service varies regionally. One Identity Safeguard provides structured support mainly for on-premise installations, but users note the need for quicker response times despite its praised support within specific regions.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering extensive functionalities at a lower cost, contributing to a positive ROI perception. Its affordability and comprehensive feature package are seen as beneficial. Conversely, One Identity Safeguard is recognized as more expensive, with the cost increasing alongside scalability needs, although it is valued for its detailed auditing and privileged access management, offering effective ROI tailored to enterprise needs.
Any PAM solution, when I deploy it well and customers use it, leads to a return on investment.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
Their technical support can be improved in terms of speed when opening a ticket.
I was very satisfied with their technical support.
I sometimes need escalations to reach expertise.
Sometimes, I get a very helpful response and they address issues on a call.
When I have day-to-day incidents and problems, the response is good enough in terms of time and quality.
The solution is highly scalable.
Cynet is very scalable.
The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is perfect, scoring ten out of ten.
We have a cluster of SPPs and a cluster of SPSs, and we can add a node to that cluster without much fuss.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.
In terms of stability, I rate One Identity Safeguard nine to ten out of ten.
I encounter problems primarily with the failover procedure.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
Integration with local Active Directory, not only Azure AD, is a must.
For some configurations on the SPS side, if I need to make changes, such as for DNS servers, I must redeploy the machine.
There are many steps. We are still in the onboarding phase, and it seems very manual.
Another area for improvement could be the threat detection capabilities, like those seen in other PAM vendors.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is.
It is cheaper than CyberArk.
It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
The SOAR function, deception, and forensics are very useful.
The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated.
I think One Identity should improve its documentation because it is vast and not clear, and clear documentation on implementing the solution would be advantageous for consultants.
Compared to other PAM solutions, it is easy to implement and use from an administrator's point of view.
Cynet provides endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. It helps companies secure files, devices, and networks from zero-day threats, reducing the need for extensive support staff through its continuous monitoring, antivirus, and anti-malware functionalities.
Cynet offers comprehensive security features, including EDR, NGAV, and MDR, suitable for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its 24/7 SOC services, seamless integration with other cybersecurity systems, and intuitive graphical interface. Features like autonomous malware blocking, scalability, detailed network user behavior analysis, and rapid policy deployment ensure robust security operations.
What are Cynet's most valuable features?Cynet is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail due to its comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities. Organizations in these sectors benefit from detailed network user behavior analysis, data aggregation, automation, and incident response, ensuring robust protection for critical infrastructure and sensitive data.
One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
