We compared Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Huawei Wireless is praised for its connectivity, performance, design, and battery life, with a focus on customer service and deployment times. D-Link Wireless highlights fast and reliable connectivity, range, and security features, with positive feedback on customer service and pricing. Huawei could improve signal strength and device compatibility, while D-Link could enhance connectivity and setup simplicity.
Features: Huawei Wireless stands out for its efficient performance, reliable signal strength, and user-friendly interface. It also offers a sleek design, extensive coverage range, long battery life, and advanced security features. In comparison, D-Link Wireless excels in fast and reliable connectivity, excellent range, strong signal strength, easy setup process, strong security features, and compatibility with various devices.
Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is praised for its reasonable and competitive pricing. Its setup cost is regarded as straightforward and hassle-free, ensuring a smooth installation process. Users appreciate the easily obtained and flexible licensing options. In contrast, D-Link Wireless is also considered reasonable and affordable in terms of pricing and setup cost, but user reviews do not explicitly mention its licensing aspect., Huawei Wireless has been shown to contribute positively to ROI, according to user feedback. Meanwhile, users express satisfaction with D-Link Wireless, highlighting its reliable performance and versatility.
Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless could improve its signal strength, compatibility with devices, user interface, durability, and longevity based on user feedback. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless could benefit from enhancements in connectivity, speed, range, signal stability, and simpler setup and configuration processes, according to user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: The feedback on Huawei Wireless suggests varying durations for deployment and setup, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, D-Link Wireless had users mentioning a three-month deployment and a week for setup, but it is noted that sometimes these terms can refer to the same period., The customer service and support for Huawei Wireless are highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and expertise. Users have reported a professional and efficient experience. On the other hand, D-Link Wireless also receives praise for their responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful customer service, with users reporting positive experiences and satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with Huawei Wireless and D-Link Wireless users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The solution is very secure."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The solution is extremely easy to install. You just add them and in a few clicks, they are ready to go."
"The initial setup process was easy."
"The connectivity is good."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The setup process is very easy."
"This product is user-friendly and we can manage it as per the requirements of the user."
"D-Link Wireless is a tool that is used since it is an easy and user-friendly product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its simplicity."
"The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations."
"That would be more of engineering at this point. I'm from more of the business side. It's pretty much doing the standard installations with portal integrations and integrations with the Mac."
"Huawei Wireless has controllers inside the switches."
"It can scale."
"I am impressed with the tool's seamless integration."
"We've found the solution to be quite stable."
"This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The solution is expensive."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The only issue is with the controller visibility of the devices connecting to the network."
"D-Link Wireless’s stability needs improvement."
"Password restriction: Sometimes we set a password and it uses that password but, after some days/months, the password gets changed and a few laptops still use old the password while a few use the new password. The password restriction option needs to improve."
"D-Link has some catching up to do in terms of advancing and improving its technology."
"It would definitely help if we had more advanced features for distributing bandwidth."
"Sometimes, the solution needs to be restarted."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"The solution's performance could be improved."
"The speed could be a bit better."
"Improving the visibility, control offered, and cloud management would all be very helpful. Also how you can monetize the information you get from Wi-Fi controllers should be improved."
"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."
"The scalability could be better."
"The technical support needs to be improved. They also need to produce some more technical guides."
"Huawei Wireless is not scalable. We have had a problem with the solution because it cannot integrate with other servers as the other competitors can."
"As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues. We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product."
"The security of the solution could be better in the future."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
D-Link Wireless is ranked 11th in Wireless LAN with 15 reviews while Huawei Wireless is ranked 9th in Wireless LAN with 33 reviews. D-Link Wireless is rated 8.0, while Huawei Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of D-Link Wireless writes "Highly reliable, provides wireless access to resources, and supports new technologies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Wireless writes "Customizable and has many unique features, such as encryption, spatial streams, and smart antennas". D-Link Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Omada Access Points, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Huawei Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Ruckus Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our D-Link Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
