Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Huawei Wireless are leading competitors in the wireless networking market. Cisco Meraki tends to be favored for its ease of use and comprehensive support, while Huawei Wireless is often noted for its advanced features and better value proposition.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers intuitive cloud management, seamless integration with other Meraki products, and user-friendly interfaces. Huawei Wireless stands out with advanced technological capabilities, higher throughput, and enhanced security features.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki needs better analytics and reporting capabilities and more competitive pricing. Huawei needs better documentation, an easier initial setup, and more consistent firmware updates.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Huawei Wireless has an efficient deployment process but receives mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki's pricing is higher, justified by robust support and intuitive management. Huawei Wireless offers lower setup costs and advanced features, providing strong ROI but necessitates careful evaluation of long-term support needs.
It's built for larger environments.
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
It's a cloud solution with Mist, which helps troubleshoot and provides visibility to look at different access points.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.