Cisco Meraki and Huawei Wireless compete in the wireless network solutions category. Cisco Meraki appears to have the edge due to its ease of deployment, user-friendly management interface, and comprehensive support options, making it particularly suitable for SMBs with limited IT resources.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized management, user-friendly dashboards, and robust Layer 7 security. Huawei Wireless provides affordability, scalability, and advanced Wi-Fi 6 capabilities, suitable for larger organizations requiring high performance.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could enhance detailed logging, integration capabilities, and technical support. Users also note downsides such as license dependency and limited customization. Huawei Wireless could improve after-sales support and user-friendly interfaces, addressing occasional scalability issues and technical bugs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki supports diverse deployment options, including cloud-managed models with simplified installation. Huawei Wireless favors on-premises deployments for organizations preferring traditional setups. Cisco typically receives praise for comprehensive support, though response times vary, while Huawei is recognized for technical assistance, with room for improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is often seen as expensive, with a subscription-based model and licensing costs, yet offers a justifiable ROI through simplified management and reduced operational expenses. Huawei Wireless stands out for competitive pricing without ongoing licensing fees, appealing to users seeking high value at a lower cost.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
