Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

D3 Security vs Exabeam comparison

D3 Security and Exabeam are both solutions in the Security Incident Response category. D3 Security is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while Exabeam is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. D3 Security holds a 2.5% mindshare in IRP, compared to Exabeam’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of D3 Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.
D3 Security
Read 2 D3 Security reviews
  • 76 Views
  • 42 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Exabeam
Read 19 Exabeam reviews
  • 85 Views
  • 50 Comparison Views
73% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Exabeam and D3 Security compete in cybersecurity solutions. Exabeam has an edge in ease of use and customer support, while D3 Security shines with comprehensive features.

Features: Exabeam offers advanced threat detection, robust identity protection, and behavioral analytics. D3 Security provides extensive orchestration, automation features, and streamlined incident response. D3 Security's automation capabilities stand out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam features an easy deployment model and excellent support, ideal for quick implementation. D3 Security has a more involved deployment process, but offers robust service options compensating with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is cost-effective, with favorable ROI due to competitive pricing and efficient performance. D3 Security, despite a premium cost, provides strong ROI for organizations utilizing its automation and orchestration features, justifying its higher initial cost.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed D3 Security vs. Exabeam Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
D3 Security vs. Exabeam
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

D3 Security
Ranking in Security Incident Response
8th
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
19th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Exabeam
Ranking in Security Incident Response
5th
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (7th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Incident Response category, the mindshare of D3 Security is 2.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exabeam is 3.4%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Aamir Riaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for automation and reporting and has open API for seamless integration
It was easy to integrate the tool with our infrastructure because all the APIs are pre-built. We just created a drag-and-drop prompt to integrate the solution with our infrastructure. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Everyone needs to evaluate this solution according to their organization's needs because it can integrate well, but this depends on the technology you already have in your organization. It is an automation tool for detection and response, and while integration is possible, using legacy products could create issues. Some legacy products are closed systems and do not expose their APIs to other vendors. In such cases, you could run into problems. If you are considering this solution, check which APIs are available before you proceed. Otherwise, you may get the solution, but you must spend time on integrations. They provide integration support, but it's not automatic; it will take time.
Read full review
Stephen-Armstrong - PeerSpot reviewer
The SIEM provides a user-friendly UI experience
When events come into the system, the dashboard categorizes them by the highest risk score, not when they appear on the system. When you've got multiple ongoing incidents you can only see the highest risk score at the top of the list rather than the most recent detection. Exabeam's reporting dashboard could have included a filtering option to filter by the most recent detection.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal."
"The solution's valuable feature is its GUI. It has more than 450 connectors, which are excellent for connecting devices and automating integration. The solution has all the features we need. We deployed it in our environment, and it's fully integrated. Thanks to their open APIs, the seamless integration makes everything work well together."
"The setup is not difficult. It was easy."
"Exabeam includes machine learning features and out-of-the-box rules that we rely on."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface."
"I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful."
"The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."
"The solution's automation capabilities are great."
"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."
More Exabeam pros
 

Cons

"Reporting needs improvement. MTTR and MTTD metrics aren't directly available in playbooks and require manual effort to achieve."
"The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux."
"Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."
"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."
"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."
"Exabeam lacks customizable dashboards, which might be a limitation if visualization is a key requirement."
"One area for the solution's improvement is integration capabilities, particularly out-of-the-box integration which sometimes requires additional professional services."
"The only problem is that the UI is not very impressive."
"Exabeam should be a bit faster, especially in loading and vulnerability scanning."
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."
More Exabeam cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"The solution is expensive."
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Non Profit
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about D3 Security?
It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for D3 Security?
We follow a different procurement process. For example, Fortinet qualified technically but lost out in the financial stage due to a two-stage bidding process. So, pricing can be subjective and depe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with D3 Security?
The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux.
See all answers
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
See all answers
What do you like most about Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
The solution's initial setup process is easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs D3 Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs D3 Security
Compared 100% of the time
More D3 Security Competitors
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam
Compared 8% of the time
Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM vs Exabeam
Compared 7% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Exabeam
Compared 6% of the time
More Exabeam Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Incident Response
March 2025
D3 Security reportDownload D3 Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Exabeam
March 2025
Exabeam reportDownload Exabeam product report
 

Interactive Demo

D3 Security
Demo not available
Exabeam
 

Overview

D3 Security provides a full-lifecycle incident management platform—one that enables multiple detection sources, enriches standards-based workflows with threat intelligence, orchestrates response, and always guides its users to conclusive remediation. The system is unique in its ability to eliminate incident recurrence, through root cause and corrective action discovery, digital forensics case management, and by generating a foundation of actionable intelligence that supports policies, countermeasures and controls.

D3 Security

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam
 

Sample Customers

S&P Global, Scotiabank, Cybereason, Cummins
Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Buyer's Guide
D3 Security vs. Exabeam
March 2025
Free Report: D3 Security vs. Exabeam
Find out what your peers are saying about D3 Security vs. Exabeam and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our D3 Security vs. Exabeam report.

We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.