Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Exabeam Logo

Top 10 Exabeam Alternatives

Vendor: Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Badge Leader
666 followers
Start review

Top Exabeam Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Exabeam based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Exabeam surpasses its competitors by offering advanced analytics and machine learning capabilities, providing superior security information and event management solutions that enhance threat detection, incident response, and streamline security operations for organizations of all sizes.

Exabeam Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Exabeam, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Exabeam Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam excels in advanced analytics and enterprise integration, making it suitable for organizations needing detailed insights and automated responses. In comparison, Wazuh provides a cost-effective, open-source platform with strong community support, appealing to those seeking extensive customization and comprehensive log analysis.
Download Exabeam vs. Wazuh Report
Exabeam's setup cost is notably high, reflecting its advanced capabilities and comprehensive support. In contrast, Wazuh offers a more economical setup cost with a strong emphasis on affordability and efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is notably high, reflecting its advanced capabilities and comprehensive support. In contrast, Wazuh offers a more economical setup cost with a strong emphasis on affordability and efficiency.
Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced analytics and automated incident response, appealing to those seeking cost-effectiveness and quick setup. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates with Azure services and AI-driven threat detection, ideal for complex environments needing extensive features and scalability, justifying its higher cost.
Download Exabeam vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security's robust data searching and real-time alerts suit large enterprises despite premium pricing and setup complexity. In comparison, Exabeam offers user-friendly analytics and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient SIEM solutions.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers scalability, customization, and robust features like automatic log source identification, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive analytics. In comparison, Exabeam provides adaptive threat detection and a simple interface, attractive for organizations seeking efficient deployment and cost-effective, flexible pricing.
Download Exabeam vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar involves a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a lower setup cost, making Exabeam the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar involves a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a lower setup cost, making Exabeam the more budget-friendly option.
Exabeam Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam excels in anomaly detection and incident response, making it highly effective at managing threats. In comparison, Elastic Security is noted for its extensive search functionalities and integration capabilities. Exabeam offers straightforward deployment and strong support, while Elastic Security benefits from its extensive documentation and active community.
Download Elastic Security vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more economical installation. Elastic Security's affordability in setup costs makes it stand out against Exabeam's higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Security, which offers a more economical installation. Elastic Security's affordability in setup costs makes it stand out against Exabeam's higher initial expense.
Exabeam Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM excels in log correlation and analytics. In comparison, Exabeam offers advanced machine learning for threat detection. LogRhythm SIEM needs better user experience and integration. Exabeam requires improved alerting. LogRhythm SIEM has complex setup but good support. Exabeam provides smoother deployment and higher ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
LogRhythm SIEM has higher setup costs, which may impact initial budgeting, whereas Exabeam offers a more economical setup cost option.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM has higher setup costs, which may impact initial budgeting, whereas Exabeam offers a more economical setup cost option.
Exabeam Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam excels in threat detection and reporting tools while offering competitive pricing. In comparison, Cynet provides all-in-one security management with endpoint detection and threat intelligence. Exabeam's strength is cost-efficiency, whereas Cynet is chosen for its extensive features despite a higher price.
Download Cynet vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its advanced feature set, while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its advanced feature set, while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Exabeam Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam excels with user behavior analytics and threat hunting, offering cost-effective pricing and a straightforward deployment process. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR provides expansive features with incident response and cloud integrations, superior customer support, and a simpler cloud-based deployment, justifying its premium price with strong ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Exabeam has higher initial setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has higher initial setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR, which offers a more straightforward and budget-friendly setup process.
Exabeam Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSIEM excels in network visibility and threat detection, complemented by its straightforward deployment and robust customer support. In comparison, Exabeam's advanced analytics and machine learning capabilities make it ideal for large-scale deployments, despite its steeper learning curve and higher initial cost.
Download Exabeam vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM Report
Fortinet FortiSIEM is noted for its high setup costs, while Exabeam has more affordable initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSIEM is noted for its high setup costs, while Exabeam has more affordable initial deployment expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Exabeam offers superior user behavior analytics, making it ideal for automated security investigations with advanced store and SOAR features. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM leverages AI for network threat detection, providing a unified database and comprehensive visibility, appealing to those needing a holistic network approach.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam's setup cost is highlighted as user-friendly and efficient, while Cortex XSIAM's setup cost is noted for being higher with more extensive configuration. This difference underscores Exabeam's advantageous setup over Cortex XSIAM.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is highlighted as user-friendly and efficient, while Cortex XSIAM's setup cost is noted for being higher with more extensive configuration. This difference underscores Exabeam's advantageous setup over Cortex XSIAM.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security offers scalable analytics and extensive integrations, providing real-time monitoring and intuitive insights. In comparison, Exabeam delivers advanced threat detection with intelligent automation. While Sumo Logic is praised for easy deployment, Exabeam is noted for comprehensive support but has higher setup costs.
Download Exabeam vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost compared to Exabeam, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Exabeam, although higher in setup cost, offers advanced features that may justify the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost compared to Exabeam, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Exabeam, although higher in setup cost, offers advanced features that may justify the investment.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is favored for its advanced analytics and robust threat detection features, making it ideal for identifying complex threats. In comparison, Exabeam is appreciated for its integration with multiple platforms and ease of deployment, offering a smoother setup experience.
Download Exabeam vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Exabeam excels in ease of use, competitive pricing, and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers comprehensive features and detailed analytics. Exabeam requires improved scalability options, while Google Chronicle Suite needs simpler configuration. Exabeam provides faster ROI; Google Chronicle Suite justifies higher costs with extensive capabilities.
Download Exabeam vs. Google Chronicle Suite Report
Exabeam typically has a higher setup cost, while Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam typically has a higher setup cost, while Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective to implement.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam excels in advanced analytics and threat detection, making it ideal for identifying sophisticated attacks. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 is praised for its comprehensive features and ease of use, offering extensive integration options and detailed compliance reports. ManageEngine Log360's simpler deployment and cost-effective pricing highly attract diverse organizations.
Download Exabeam vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Log360. ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Log360. ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup.
Exabeam Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere excels in asset discovery and vulnerability assessment, making it attractive for essential security needs, especially for those on smaller budgets. In comparison, Exabeam's user behavior analytics and automated responses cater to advanced threat detection, providing significant long-term ROI despite a higher initial cost.
Download Exabeam vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere offers lower setup costs compared to Exabeam, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Exabeam's higher initial setup costs could be justified by its advanced capabilities and features.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere offers lower setup costs compared to Exabeam, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Exabeam's higher initial setup costs could be justified by its advanced capabilities and features.
Exabeam Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics, appealing to those focused on analytics. In comparison, Devo's strong integration capabilities and powerful querying performance cater to versatile needs. Exabeam's higher costs correlate with ROI, while Devo provides competitive pricing and superior customer support.
Download Devo vs. Exabeam Report
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost compared to Devo, with Devo offering a more cost-effective alternative right from the start.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher initial setup cost compared to Devo, with Devo offering a more cost-effective alternative right from the start.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
3.9 out of 5
ArcSight ESM offers comprehensive monitoring with detailed correlation alerts, ideal for security-intensive environments. In comparison, Exabeam's user behavior analytics and machine learning-based threat detection cater to advanced analytics needs. ArcSight ESM focuses on customization, while Exabeam emphasizes streamlined operations and automated responses.
Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Exabeam Report
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) has a higher setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) has a higher setup cost, whereas Exabeam offers a lower initial investment.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.
Download Exabeam vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Exabeam Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint is renowned for its competitive pricing and excellent support, making it a favorite among cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Exabeam excels in advanced features and comprehensive threat detection, appealing to larger enterprises seeking detailed analytics and higher ROI despite a more complex deployment.
Download Exabeam vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Exabeam entails a higher initial investment for a more complex setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Exabeam entails a higher initial investment for a more complex setup.
Exabeam Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Trellix ESM features robust threat intelligence and extensive integrations. In comparison, Exabeam excels with advanced machine learning and ease of use. Trellix ESM could enhance scalability, while Exabeam requires better documentation. Trellix ESM has higher setup costs, whereas Exabeam offers a better balance of pricing and ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM users report moderately high setup costs, while Exabeam users note lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM users report moderately high setup costs, while Exabeam users note lower initial setup expenses.
Exabeam Logo
Trellix Helix
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam Logo
Trellix Helix
4.4 out of 5
Exabeam excels in threat detection and automated response features. In comparison, Trellix Helix is valuable for advanced analytics capabilities. Exabeam focuses on speed and automation, whereas Trellix Helix emphasizes deep analytics, offering tech buyers distinct solutions based on their security priorities.
Download Exabeam vs. Trellix Helix Report
Exabeam has a higher setup cost with detailed implementation steps, whereas Trellix Helix offers a lower and more straightforward setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a higher setup cost with detailed implementation steps, whereas Trellix Helix offers a lower and more straightforward setup process.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service
3.5 out of 5

Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is a comprehensive solution designed to provide organizations with advanced threat detection and response capabilities. This cloud-based service leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence to analyze vast amounts of security data in real time, enabling proactive identification and mitigation of potential threats. 

The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable.
View comparison
Pricing
The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced analytics and flexible deployment, appealing to those prioritizing affordability and ease of use. In comparison, Google Security Operations attracts tech buyers seeking integration with Google Cloud and long-term value through its comprehensive features and machine learning capabilities.
Download Exabeam vs. Google Security Operations Report
Exabeam's setup cost is significantly higher than Google Security Operations. Google provides a lower initial investment, while Exabeam requires more upfront, possibly reflecting the complexity and depth of its installation and implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam's setup cost is significantly higher than Google Security Operations. Google provides a lower initial investment, while Exabeam requires more upfront, possibly reflecting the complexity and depth of its installation and implementation process.
Exabeam Logo
Exabeam Logo
ArcSight Intelligence
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Intelligence excels in advanced threat detection and machine learning capabilities, making it ideal for organizations focused on identifying unknown threats with precision. In comparison, Exabeam's user analytics and workflow automation provide a comprehensive solution for those seeking simplicity, efficiency, and a higher ROI.
Download ArcSight Intelligence vs. Exabeam Report
ArcSight Intelligence has a higher initial setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more budget-friendly setup investment. ArcSight's advanced setup complexity contrasts with Exabeam's simpler, more straightforward implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Intelligence has a higher initial setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers a more budget-friendly setup investment. ArcSight's advanced setup complexity contrasts with Exabeam's simpler, more straightforward implementation process.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)