Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025
CrowdStrike Falcon and Exabeam are competitors in the cybersecurity and threat management space. CrowdStrike Falcon has an edge in real-time threat remediation and action-oriented security, while Exabeam is preferred for advanced analytics and security orchestration.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint visibility, advanced threat analysis, and efficient real-time threat remediation, with standout features like OverWatch and a lightweight AI-driven approach that avoids constant device scanning. Exabeam excels in behavior analytics, providing strong capabilities in analytics and integration, which are essential for threat detection and security orchestration.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve by enhancing its integration with on-premises security tools and refining reporting functionalities, and user interface simplification. Exabeam needs to focus on reducing false positives, improving API interactions, and better integration with cloud-native networks. Faster load times and documentation enhancements are also desired for Exabeam.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon allows flexible deployment across private, public, and hybrid cloud environments, offering responsive technical support, though quicker responses and enhanced communication are desired. Exabeam is noted for easy deployment in on-premises and public cloud environments, with positive feedback on support that could still use some speed and personal touch improvements.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is positioned as a premium product with higher costs linked to its comprehensive protection services, delivering a justified ROI through reduced incidents. Exabeam offers a competitive pricing structure that adapts to organizational needs, presenting a more accessible choice with a balance between cost and feature set.
To learn more, read our detailed
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Exabeam Report (Updated: March 2025).
