Exabeam vs Swimlane comparison

Exabeam and Swimlane are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Exabeam is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5, while Swimlane is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.6. Exabeam holds a 2.7% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Swimlane’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Swimlane users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Exabeam and Swimlane are competitors in the security and automation sector. Exabeam appears to have an advantage due to its ease of deployment and superior customer service.

Features: Exabeam provides advanced security information and event management with machine learning to enhance threat detection and response. Swimlane offers high-level security orchestration, automation, and response capabilities with broad integration and automation options. Exabeam's SIEM functions are ideal for those focused on threat detection while Swimlane provides extensive automation tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam offers a simple deployment model backed by excellent customer support, making implementation easier. Swimlane provides more flexible deployment scenarios but may require technical expertise for installation. Exabeam gains an edge due to its effective onboarding and customer support services.

Pricing and ROI: Exabeam offers competitive starting costs with an emphasis on long-term value by reducing incident response times. Swimlane's initial setup expenses could be higher, yet its automation might provide significant ROI. Exabeam is often perceived as offering better pricing for its core SIEM capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Exabeam vs. Swimlane Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. Swimlane

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 4.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exabeam is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Swimlane is 2.9%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Torq	4.5%
Swimlane	2.9%
Exabeam	2.7%
Other	89.9%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi

Global IT Director at OpenWeb

Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control

We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.

Read full review

Deepanshu Hans

Solution Architect at CTC

Improved threat detection has provided clear user risk insights and streamlined incident response

Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far. Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good. Exabeam's automation for incident response is very good. The machine learning capabilities of Exabeam are also good.

Read full review

MoumitaDas

Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Task persistence and integration ease have been key benefits

The best part of Swimlane is the persistent notifications and its ease of integration, requiring minimal coding. While it lacks response features, it can be integrated with messaging or queue services to achieve this. Any incident response requires additional integration since Swimlane itself doesn't react to incidents. Real-time data in terms of persistence is configurable, and without config, tasks persist indefinitely until completion. If using Appian versions below 11, integration features for Swimlane aren't available. By default, Swimlane lacks built-in intelligence, needing coding for integration. Although the Swimlane is beneficial and reduces manpower requirements, it's hindered by its lack of exposure. If exposed through services or endpoints, its functionality could be accessed without needing a local standalone application. On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

"Any request that comes in, regardless of how complex it is, I can accomplish it with Torq."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"Timeline based analysis; good platform support"

"The solution's initial setup process is easy."

"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."

"The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface."

"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."

"The solution's automation capabilities are great."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"The UI was very clean."

More Exabeam pros

"It provides us with a single portal for our logs from different solutions."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the support."

"We are using it for a SOAR platform at a Cyber Security company which is MSSP."

"The biggest advantage of Swimlane for us is that it saves time, which in turn helps us in cost-saving."

"On a scale of one to ten, this solution deserves a rating of nine."

"Swimlane enables two SOC analysts to work efficiently as much as ten analysts would without Swimlane, which translates to significant manpower savings."

"Swimlane saves us 80 to 90 percent of our time by quickly helping us design the journey and efficiently passing information to various components."

"Our primary goal was to reduce analyst time, and we have been successful in that."

More Swimlane pros

Cons

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"Regarding the pricing of Torq, I would say it is expensive."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."

"Exabeam should be a bit faster, especially in loading and vulnerability scanning."

"We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules."

"The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate"

"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."

"The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."

"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."

"Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management."

More Exabeam cons

"Swimlane's search bar is not working effectively, and there is no option to differentiate between two cases at the same time."

"I would like to see improvements in the minor bugs that occur with each update, as some features might have issues."

"We faced a lot of issues with the product’s stability."

"I would prefer to have more colors added to represent different risks or notations, which can be used for the prioritization of risks and the significance of information."

"Swimlane is not scalable because it is not exposed. Currently, it's a manual component that requires configuration through coding."

"There is a need for enhanced version control in Swimlane. Currently, our version does not support it, making it tough to move changes between environments during significant updates."

"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."

"One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers."

More Swimlane cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."

"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."

"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."

"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

"The solution is expensive."

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

We do not utilize the AI features that much. When it comes to general AI features of Torq, we are just slowly startin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

Torq markets itself as a security tool, and we do use them for security, but not in the traditional sense they market...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

I would rate Torq an eight overall. I feel that Torq is as good as the effort you put into it. The limitations are ve...

See all answers

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?

It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?

Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-b...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Swimlane?

One of the disadvantages of Swimlane is that to manage the platform, we need hardcore developers. We have recently se...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Swimlane?

We are using Swimlane for automation purposes and security orchestration. We are using Swimlane's Playbook Automation...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Swimlane?

I would rate Swimlane a seven out of ten as a product.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 44% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 14% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam

Compared 7% of the time

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam

Compared 5% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

DTEX InTERCEPT vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam

Compared 4% of the time

More Exabeam Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 20% of the time

Tines vs Swimlane

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Swimlane

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Swimlane

Compared 7% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Swimlane

Compared 4% of the time

More Swimlane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

January 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam

February 2026

Download Exabeam product report

Buyer's Guide

Swimlane

January 2026

Download Swimlane product report

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Swimlane is a leader in security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). By automating time-intensive, manual processes and operational workflows and delivering powerful, consolidated analytics, real time dashboards and reporting from across your security infrastructure, Swimlane maximizes the incident response capabilities of over-burdened and understaffed security operations.

Swimlane was founded to deliver scalable innovative and flexible security solutions to organizations struggling with alert fatigue, vendor proliferation and chronic staffing shortages. Swimlane is at the forefront of the growing market for security automation and orchestration solutions that automate and organize security processes in repeatable ways to get the most out of available resources and accelerate incident response.

Swimlane

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank

LinkedIn, TransUnion, Citrix, Aetna, Perspecta

Buyer's Guide

Exabeam vs. Swimlane

February 2026

Free Report: Exabeam vs. Swimlane

Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. Swimlane and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exabeam vs. Swimlane report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.