Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DarwinBox vs PeopleWorks HCM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
DarwinBox scales well for small to medium companies but faces challenges with large entities due to transition issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
DarwinBox features a user-friendly interface with social, help desk, organogram, attendance, and leave management, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
2.8
DarwinBox needs improvements in customization, integration, user interface, and management functions, with enhanced vendor collaboration and server stability.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.3
DarwinBox's stability experiences vary, with some users satisfied and others noting instability, while many find it too early to judge.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

DarwinBox
Ranking in Cloud HCM
16th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Talent Management (23rd), HR Analytics Software (8th), Talent Acquisition (11th)
PeopleWorks HCM
Ranking in Cloud HCM
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of DarwinBox is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleWorks HCM is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud HCM
 

Featured Reviews

SHANOOPCHATHOTH PARAMBIL - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing attendance and leave management but needs better performance customization
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles DarwinBox has provided a significant return on investment for our finance team. Managing payroll and attendance manually would require more team members, so using DarwinBox…
Use PeopleWorks HCM?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DarwinBox?
The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping.
What needs improvement with DarwinBox?
Customization in performance management is cumbersome. Processes like six-month appraisals lack easy configurations, and any significant customization requires working with vendors.
What is your primary use case for DarwinBox?
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
PeopleWorks
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Myntra, GVK BIO, Bisleri, Times Internet, Delhivery, Aarti
Janalakshmi, Toyota Financial Services, Oorja, Jakson Empowering People, SBICAP Trustee Company Ltd, pramata, Zoomcar, autohanger, BiLFINGER
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.