DarwinBox vs Keka Performance comparison

DarwinBox and Keka are both solutions in the Talent Management category. DarwinBox is ranked #23 with an average rating of 5.7, while Keka is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. DarwinBox holds a 1.8% mindshare in TM, compared to Keka’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of DarwinBox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keka users who would recommend it.

DarwinBox

Read 4 DarwinBox reviews

1,156 Views
752 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Keka Performance

Read 1 Keka Performance review

157 Views
101 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DarwinBox

Keka Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and Keka Performance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Talent Management Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Talent Management

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

DarwinBox

Ranking in Talent Management

23rd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud HCM (16th), HR Analytics Software (8th), Talent Acquisition (11th)

Keka Performance

Ranking in Talent Management

28th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of DarwinBox is 1.8%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Keka Performance is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Talent Management

Featured Reviews

SHANOOPCHATHOTH PARAMBIL

Program Manager at Intelliswift

Enhancing attendance and leave management but needs better performance customization

Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles DarwinBox has provided a significant return on investment for our finance team. Managing payroll and attendance manually would require more team members, so using DarwinBox…

Read full review

Soumyojit Sen

Director of Product Management at EIM solutions

User-friendly and has an easy-to-use user interface, but does not provide project or task management features

We use the tool for resourcing, recruitment, employee attendance, payroll, and performance evaluation The interface is good. The features and performance are also good. I rate the performance an eight out of ten. It is user-friendly and easy to use. It is a secure product. The solution must…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The leave-related modules are comprehensive, offering built-in functionalities for optional leaves."

"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."

"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."

"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."

"The interface is good."

Cons

"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."

"Customization in performance management is cumbersome."

"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."

"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."

"The solution must provide project or task management features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company makes some yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to DarwinBox."

"Compared with SuccessFactors, there is no major difference in DarwinBox's cost."

"It would be good if the product were cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DarwinBox?

The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DarwinBox?

Customization in performance management is cumbersome. Processes like six-month appraisals lack easy configurations, and any significant customization requires working with vendors.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DarwinBox?

Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles.

See all answers

What do you like most about Keka Performance?

The interface is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Keka Performance?

We pay a yearly license fee. It would be good if the product were cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Keka Performance?

The solution must provide project or task management features. It would be good if it could be integrated with Zoho Projects or GitLab. If Keka provides project management features, we need not use...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP SuccessFactors vs DarwinBox

Compared 30% of the time

PeopleStrong vs DarwinBox

Compared 19% of the time

ZingHR vs DarwinBox

Compared 17% of the time

Ramco HCM vs DarwinBox

Compared 6% of the time

Workday vs DarwinBox

Compared 5% of the time

More DarwinBox Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud HCM

December 2024

Download DarwinBox product report

Buyer's Guide

Talent Management

November 2024

Download Keka Performance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Keka HR

Learn More

DarwinBox

Keka

Overview

Darwinbox is a cloud-based, feature-rich human resources management system that emphasizes on usability and data protection. ... The software unifies all your HR processes, enabling you to be on top of your employees' whole lifecycle with a centralized, singular platform.

Keka is the PMS that really works for growth-minded organizations that need continuous performance reviews on a real-time basis. Keka performance management software monitors, analyzes, tracks, and evaluates employee performance to ensure that goals are achieved, and the desired ROI is accomplished.

Sample Customers

Myntra, GVK BIO, Bisleri, Times Internet, Delhivery, Aarti

vedanta, oyo, oneplus, dream 11, Netambit, Exotel, Upgrad, Travel traingle, Zestmoney, hitachi, Wood stock, Mitsubhishi, Karcher,

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.