Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Databricks vs RapidMiner comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.7
IBM SPSS Statistics delivers 50% ROI by streamlining data analysis, saving time and money for organizations and universities.
Sentiment score
6.5
Users saved significantly on costs and increased efficiency by moving workloads to Databricks, achieving $75k ROI per year.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM SPSS Statistics users experience varied customer service, generally finding it good; some appreciate prompt assistance, others rarely need support.
Sentiment score
7.1
Databricks support is praised for technical expertise and engagement, but experiences vary due to response times and Microsoft partner handling.
Sentiment score
7.5
RapidMiner is praised for effective customer service and diverse support options, including technical support, forums, and built-in guidance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
Users report mixed scalability with IBM SPSS, affected by dataset size, infrastructure, and comparisons to competitors like SAS.
Sentiment score
7.5
Databricks offers significant, praised scalability from megabytes to petabytes, supporting vertical and horizontal scaling with auto-scaling features.
Sentiment score
6.5
RapidMiner scales well for large data, supporting batch and real-time processing, but deployment in expansive environments may need assistance.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM SPSS Statistics is reliable, handling large datasets well, though minor issues may occur with low RAM environments.
Sentiment score
7.8
Databricks is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues reported, especially during heavy processes, and receives high user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.2
RapidMiner is stable with minor delays; user confidence remains strong though stability varies with large datasets and extensions.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM SPSS Statistics needs improvements in visualization, pricing, interface, integration, documentation, and automation for better user experience.
Databricks faces challenges with visualization, integration, costs, error clarity, libraries, interfaces, documentation, onboarding, automation, governance, and performance.
RapidMiner needs UI, deep learning, algorithm enhancements, Python integration, better tutorials, competitive pricing, and improved documentation.
 

Setup Cost

IBM SPSS Statistics is costly, with advanced models up to $7,000, though discounts exist for educational and developing regions.
Databricks pricing varies greatly based on usage and cluster type, often considered expensive with additional cloud storage costs.
RapidMiner provides a cost-effective freemium model with fees from $5,000 to $10,000, offering powerful features without hidden costs.
 

Valuable Features

IBM SPSS Statistics offers a user-friendly interface, robust analysis features, and flexible data handling for comprehensive statistical projects.
Databricks offers user-friendly large-scale analytics, seamless integration, versatile coding, collaborative tools, and efficient big data handling with extensive cloud support.
RapidMiner offers a user-friendly platform with automation, diverse machine learning tools, and support for non-coders, enhancing efficiency.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM SPSS Statistics
Sponsored
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Data Mining (3rd)
Databricks
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (1st)
RapidMiner
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Predictive Analytics (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM SPSS Statistics is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Databricks is 19.2%, up from 18.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RapidMiner is 7.7%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Md Masudul Hassan - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive data analysis capabilities with a user-friendly interface, providing an efficient and reliable platform for researchers and analysts
I believe that offering short-term SPSS licenses, perhaps when customer sourcing is available, could make it more affordable. These licenses shouldn't include features tailored for universities or large sales organizations. Instead, they could offer discounts or additional facilities for smaller entities to access the software. In developing countries, it would be beneficial to provide certain features to users at no cost initially, while also customizing pricing options. For example, offering basic features to the first hundred users can help them become familiar with the software and its capabilities. This approach encourages users to upgrade to higher tiers as they become more experienced and require additional functionality.
Dunstan Matekenya - PeerSpot reviewer
Process large-scale data sets and integrates with Apache Spark with notebook environment
Databricks integrates natively with Apache Spark, which I use as a processing engine for large-scale datasets. This native integration is one of its strengths. Another strength is that the platform makes it very easy to manage resources. For example, setting up a cluster of five or fifteen nodes is straightforward with Databricks. The notebook environment is also excellent, making it easy to perform various tasks.
Rathnam Makam - PeerSpot reviewer
A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models
One challenge I encountered while implementing RapidMiner was the lack of documentation. Since there aren't as many users, finding resources to learn the tool was initially difficult. To overcome this hurdle, I believe RapidMiner could improve by providing more tutorials tailored for new users. I haven't explored the tool's latest version, so I'm unaware of the current features. However, I think it would be beneficial if they could enhance capabilities related to deep neural networks, provide better support for generating UI, and allow for importing and utilizing large language models.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
University
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM SPSS Statistics?
The software offers consistency across multiple research projects helping us with predictive analytics capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Statistics?
The cost of IBM SPSS Statistics is managed by organizations, not individual researchers. It is a very expensive produ...
What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Statistics?
IBM SPSS Statistics does not keep you close to your data like KNIME. In KNIME, at every stage, you can see the result...
Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or ...
How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?
We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designe...
Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analyti...
What do you like most about RapidMiner?
RapidMiner is a no-code machine learning tool. I can install it on my local machine and work with smaller datasets. I...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RapidMiner?
I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately pri...
What needs improvement with RapidMiner?
The product must provide data-cleaning features. I could not use RapidMiner for data cleaning in one of my projects a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SPSS Statistics
Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA, Razorsight, Si.mobil, University Hospitals of Leicester, CROOZ Inc., GFS Fundraising Solutions, Nedbank Ltd., IDS-TILDA
Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware
PayPal, Deloitte, eBay, Cisco, Miele, Volkswagen
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. RapidMiner and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.