We performed a comparison between DataRobot and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two AI Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We especially like the initial part of feature engineering, because feature engineering is included in most engines, but DataRobot has an excellent way of picking up the right features."
"DataRobot can be easy to use."
"It's easy to do MLOps operations. It's a lot easier to manage jobs and see the logs if there's any drift in a model."
"The initial setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The product is well organized. The thing is how we will get the models to work within our code. We have some suggestions there, but we want to gain more experience and be ready to answer that because we are currently working on this and don't have all the answers yet. The tool is well organized. What I am very happy about is the ease of deploying new resources. You can easily create your pipeline within minutes."
"It is a scalable solution…It is a pretty stable solution…The solution's initial setup process was pretty straightforward."
"Azure's AutoML feature is probably better than the competition."
"Split dataset, variety of algorithms, visualizing the data, and drag and drop capability are the features I appreciate most."
"MLS allows me to set up data experiments by running through various regression and other machine learning algorithms, with different data cleaning and treatment tools. All of this can be achieved via drag and drop, and a few clicks of the mouse."
"The ability to do the templating and be able to transfer it so that I can easily do multiple types of models and data mining is a valuable aspect of this solution. You only have to set up the flows, the templates, and the data once and then you can make modifications and test different segmentations throughout."
"The product's standout feature is a robust multi-file network with limited availability."
"The business departments will love to work with DataRobot because they use the tool to investigate their data, such as targeting what they want to investigate. They don't need any data scientists near them. They can investigate at eye level and bring into the BI tool, or can bring it to the data scientist. Data scientists can use this tool to bring increase the solution to the maximum. All the others can use it, but not to the maximum."
"Generative AI has taken pace, and I would like to see how DataRobot assists in doing generative AI and large language models."
"If we could include our existing Python or R code in DataRobot, we could make it even better. The DataRobot that we have is specific to an industry, but most of the time we would have our own algorithms, which are specific to our own use case. If we had a way by which we could integrate our proprietary things into DataRobot with a simple integration, it would help us a lot."
"While ML Studio does give you the ability to run a lot of transformations, it struggles when the transformations are a bit more complex, when your entire process is transformation-heavy."
"Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio worked okay for me, so right now, I don't have any room for improvement in mind for it. What I'd like added to Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio in its next version is a categorization for use cases or a template that makes the use cases simple to map out, for example, for healthcare, medical, or finance use cases, etc. This would be very helpful for users of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, especially for beginners."
"The solution should be more customizable. There should be more algorithms."
"Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio could improve in providing more efficient and cost-effective access to its tools for companies like mine."
"I think it should be made cheaper for certain people…It may appear costlier for those who don't consider time important."
"It would be great if the solution integrated Microsoft Copilot, its AI helper."
"Using the solution requires some specific learning which can take some time."
"The platform's integration feature could be better."
More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
DataRobot is ranked 13th in AI Development Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is ranked 1st in AI Development Platforms with 53 reviews. DataRobot is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DataRobot writes "Easy to manage jobs and see the logs if there's any drift in a model, user-friendly, and the data munching is fast". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio writes "Good support for Azure services in pipelines, but deploying outside of Azure is difficult". DataRobot is most compared with Amazon SageMaker, RapidMiner, Datadog, Alteryx and SAS Predictive Analytics, whereas Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is most compared with Google Vertex AI, Databricks, Azure OpenAI and TensorFlow. See our DataRobot vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio report.
See our list of best AI Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all AI Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.