Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Fudo PAM comparison

Delinea and Fudo Security are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Delinea is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Fudo Security is ranked #25. Delinea holds a 3.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Fudo Security’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Delinea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fudo Security users who would recommend it.

Delinea Privileged Access S...

Read 11 Delinea Privileged Access Service reviews

1,029 Views
682 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

974 Views
592 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Delinea Privileged Access S...

Fudo PAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Delinea Privileged Access Service and Fudo PAM compete in the privileged access management sector. Delinea shows better deployment flexibility, while Fudo PAM stands out for its robust features.

Features: Delinea offers seamless integration into existing systems, comprehensive access control features, and scalable architecture. It also provides real-time monitoring. Fudo PAM features advanced session recording, forensic analysis tools, and intuitive implementation, supporting high-security environments with effective risk management.

Room for Improvement: Delinea could improve by enhancing reporting tools, support response times, and extending custom integrations. Fudo PAM users seek more customization options, improved third-party integrations, and refined user interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Delinea's deployment options include on-premises and cloud integration, appealing to varied IT environments. Its customer service is generally responsive, though some variability is noted. Fudo PAM's straightforward deployment requires comprehensive initial setup guidance. Consistent and knowledgeable support is appreciated by users.

Pricing and ROI: Delinea is viewed as cost-effective with a quick ROI, balancing price and functionality. Fudo PAM, while more expensive, offers superior long-term value through extensive security features, justifying investment for organizations prioritizing advanced control and security.

To learn more, read our detailed Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Delinea Privileged Access S...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Password Managers (11th)

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Delinea Privileged Access Service is 3.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Siva Jp

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTIMindtree

Very cost-effective and provides secure access to environments

It is difficult to integrate the product with other IT systems. We must contact professional service support. We do not have any control over it since it is a SaaS solution. We must go through Delinea’s PS team for all the integrations. We provide the requirements, the thought process, and the ideology of the workflow. However, it can be executed only by the PS team because we don't have any control or access to the application. As a SaaS consumer, I cannot do any custom scripting into the application. The PS team does all the customizations we require. The solution must improve the technical support.

Read full review

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Delinea Privileged Access Service is we can use the server as a jump host. It is simple to manage the accounts on the system."

"Delinea Privileged Access Service's UI part was very user-friendly for secure credential storage and management."

"The vault and auditing capabilities are the most valuable feature because they include multiple reports that allow us to create our own reports."

"The solution is flexible."

"The reporting is excellent."

"There are benefits in the security realm. We use Delinea at an enterprise level. I imagine there are productivity gains, but moreover, it's the security. We don’t enable staff to see the passwords of boxes but it's all being tracked and logged now."

"This is a cloud-based application, which makes it very easy to deploy."

"The solution provides secure access to environments."

More Delinea Privileged Access Service pros

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

Cons

"I would have been really happy if Delinea were evolving or innovating like CyberArk. Delinea needs to innovate more to match the changing needs of the market."

"There needs to be a notification when a password is near expiration."

"I would like for there to be a suitable solution to deploy a low-spec version for desktop password management to all our staff."

"The integration with sync could be improved."

"This solution needs better integration with third-party solutions because their ability to support other tools is very weak."

"Enhancing the solution by incorporating additional features to make it comprehensive would be beneficial. It would be more convenient to have a complete package solution that consolidates all the features in one place, making it easier to manage. Currently, I am required to access two separate servers for reports, which could be avoided if all the necessary features were available in a single location. This would be highly advantageous for managing everything effectively."

"It is difficult to integrate the product with other IT systems."

"With Delinea Privileged Access Service, when installing the identity connectors to configure with AD, the configuration was not happening properly."

More Delinea Privileged Access Service cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"The stability is not very good."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced too high, so I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"The product comes at a very good price and it's quite competitive, although you need to buy add-ons for certain things."

"It is sad that people with a limited budget won't be able to afford it."

"The price model is based on the number of devices and opposed to the number of users, and it is not very flexible."

"In addition to the license fees, we have to pay for the server and admin fees."

"The price of Delinea Privileged Access Service is average compared to its competitors."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The price is cheap if I compare Delinea Privileged Access Service with other products."

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Delinea Privileged Access Service?

The solution provides secure access to environments.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Delinea Privileged Access Service?

The difference in license cost is minimal, with CyberArk being slightly costly due to its market-leading position. The difference is in the range of a few hundred dollars.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fudo PAM?

Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fudo PAM?

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fudo PAM?

The main use case is for protecting privileged user access, such as securing remote access services. Another important use case is when we work with third-party users and need to provide password m...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs Delinea Privileged Access Service

Compared 20% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Delinea Privileged Access Service

Compared 13% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs Delinea Privileged Access Service

Compared 8% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Delinea Privileged Access Service

Compared 8% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Delinea Privileged Access Service

Compared 7% of the time

More Delinea Privileged Access Service Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 25% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 23% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 16% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 13% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Privileged Access Service

December 2024

Delinea Privileged Access Service report

Download Delinea Privileged Access Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

December 2024

Download Fudo PAM product report

Also Known As

Centrify Privileged Access Service, Centrify Zero Trust Privilege Services, Centrify Zero Trust Privilege, Centrify Infrastructure Services, Centrify Server Suite, Centrify Privilege Service

Fudo Privileged Access Management

Learn More

Video not available

Delinea

Fudo Security

Overview

Delinea Privilege Service provides all of your IT administration teams with secure, granular access to infrastructure regardless of location, and without the hassles of a VPN.
Secure browser-based access Authorized IT users launch management sessions for resources directly from the Privilege Service portal. Sessions use SSH and RDP protocols, and are always protected end-to-end.

Access across organizational boundaries Privilege Service enables you to authenticate your IT users through Active Directory, LDAP Cloud Directory, or Google G Suite
Directory. You can use one or any combination of these identity stores to grant granular access to employees, business partners and outside vendors.

Grant access to specific resources Unlike a VPN, Privilege Service enables you to grant access to
resources on a on a per-resource basis. This means that you can easily give your internal IT admins access to as much of your infrastructure as necessary, while limiting access by an outsourced
team to only the servers and network hardware their business role or IT function requires.

Access from any location Your IT admins can log in and securely access resources from any location that can reach the Privilege Service. For user logins outside the corporate network, you can require Delinea's built-in multi-factor authentication for security stronger than a user name and password.

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Sample Customers

Boeing, Citi, Credit Suissw, Delta, Duke Energy, FDIC, GE Capital, Harvard University, Johnson & Johnson, Major League Baseball, Michelin, Microsoft

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM

December 2024

Free Report: Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM

Find out what your peers are saying about Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.