Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility ) [EOL] vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell SRDF (Symmetrix Remote...
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp SnapMirror
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

AN
Apr 14, 2020
RPO and RTO have improved drastically
SRDF is used our disaster recovery service by using replication from our production site to our DR site. We have two different production and DR site pairs in two different global geographies. One use case has got SRDF asynchronous replication and another has SRDF synchronous replication primarily…
Christopher Cagayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2023
Protects our data during any emergency or disaster
Everybody in our company relies on SnapMirror, as everyone uses it to transfer data. We use it 24/7 and 365 days a year, running continuously to synchronize data. It is mostly used for data replication, data recovery, and data transfer. It helps to transfer the data to other sites and from the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature of taking snapshots from the replicated volumes has allowed us to use them for DR testing to validate the application consistent point of recovery."
"We've found the support to be very good overall."
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"NetApp SnapMirror stands out for its ease of management, efficiency, and scalability, which align well with our operational needs."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
 

Cons

"If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult."
"The main pain point that we experienced is during device creation. For every newly provisioned volume, creating replication relationships between production and DR site, creating snapshots for third copy at DR site, and configuring them in appropriate replication groups and device groups means that there are lot of steps involved and a lot of room for error. There has to be a lot of checks and balances which need to be incorporated to make sure that the solution is set up correctly."
"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."
"It's a highly cost-effective solution"
"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."
"The cost is low compared to different vendors."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The product price is reasonable."
"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."
"The pricing can be improved."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?
The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
SnapMirror
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Global Security Provider, SSM Health Care, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Shriners, BZWBK, Qatar Islamic Bank, Sudwestrundfunk (SWR)
University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.