Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Guardian vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

Fortra and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8, while WithSecure is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to WithSecure’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Digital Guardian
Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews
  • 1,115 Views
  • 715 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 6 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response reviews
  • 752 Views
  • 539 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response are leading solutions in the endpoint protection market. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response generally has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and smoother deployment process.

Features: Users recognize Digital Guardian for its robust data loss prevention capabilities, advanced threat protection, and encryption features. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response stands out with real-time monitoring, automated incident response, and advanced behavioral analysis.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian users note the need for better reporting tools, more seamless integration capabilities, and improved user interface design. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response users suggest faster incident response speed, enhanced user documentation, and more detailed alert explanations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian users report that deployment can be complex and time-consuming, with customer service being responsive but needing improvement in handling complex issues. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response receives strong reviews for easier deployment and highly responsive customer service, simplifying the initial setup and ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian users indicate that the initial setup cost is high but see a favorable ROI due to its strong protection features. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response users find the pricing justified given the feature set and achieve significant ROI more quickly, perceiving it as offering better value for the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
41st
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (11th), Endpoint Encryption (9th), Mobile Data Protection (7th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
48th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available
Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.
Read full review
Eckart Jensen - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an additional secure filter for banking-related pages and protects from viruses, malware, and attacks
The tool’s initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it a ten out of ten. However, for the setup of the mobile version, I would only rate it an eight out of ten. You will receive an invitation link and you get access as portal admin when you click on it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."
"The technical support is really terrific."
"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."
"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."
"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."
"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."
"It has been scalable."
"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."
More Digital Guardian pros
"I use the solution to protect our infrastructure. The tool has special frames for banking. There is an additional secure filter for banking-related pages. It protects me from viruses, malware, and attacks."
"WithSecure includes an encrypted drive that stores a key for accessing the encrypted data."
"The only issue that we have today is with false positives. We have too many false positives with the solution."
"The product is stable."
"It offers good scalability."
"It is a scalable solution."
 

Cons

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."
"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."
"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."
"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."
"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."
"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."
"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."
"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."
More Digital Guardian cons
"Its automated functionality could be better."
"The website rules are too complicated."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable. My company has 800-1000 customers."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The tool’s mobile version needs to be improved."
"The monthly reporting feature of WithSecure can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."
"The cost was around $300,000."
"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."
"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."
"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."
"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly."
"The solution's price is moderate."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. Its pricing is competitive."
"I rate WithSecure a four out of ten because it's quite economical."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
Computer Software Company
22%
Comms Service Provider
19%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?
I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?
Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?
If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
The product is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response's licensing costs are yearly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response?
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response need to improve pricing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 27% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian
Compared 8% of the time
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 7% of the time
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Digital Guardian Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Digital Guardian
Compared 6% of the time
More Digital Guardian Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 52% of the time
Microsoft Defender XDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 16% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 13% of the time
Fortinet FortiEDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 11% of the time
Cynet vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cynet vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Compared 9% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian
April 2025
Digital Guardian reportDownload Digital Guardian product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, F-Secure Rapid Detection and Response, F-Secure RDR
 

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Detection and Response gives you instant visibility into your IT environment and security status from a single pane of glass. It keeps your business and data safe by detecting attacks fast and responding with expert guidance. And you can elevate the hardest cases to our elite cyber security specialists, so we always have your back.

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
Blackfin
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
March 2025
Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Digital Guardian vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.